He was fully human but He was also fully divine.Jesus was entirely human.
If you are saying that Jesus was only human and not also divine, you are making a heretical assertion.
He was fully human but He was also fully divine.Jesus was entirely human.
What I mean is that he seems to be flip-flopping on specific issues. There is no need for you to assume that I'm attacking him, and attack me in the process.so? did your understanding come instantly? Give Jacob a break, we are supposed to discuss and encourage lovingly between believers, so far Jacob was attacked by many he said many times he was not certain...
Peace be with us all.
No. I was not saying that. Many people say that Jesus was only human. But I believe that He is also the Son of God.He was fully human but He was also fully divine.
If you are saying that Jesus was only human and not also divine, you are making a heretical assertion.
I don't have a problem with the quote, just with what you are saying.
I don't understand what all of that means.All I am saying is what is written.
John 20:28
28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord (Kurios] and my God
(Theos]. KJV The use of both the word "Lord," and "God" And in the Greek manuscripts both words ("Lord" and "God") have the definite article. Below is the Strong's definitions for both the definite article and the word "Lord" and the word "God." [the definite article]: Greek word #3588 ho (hol; including the feminine he (hayl; and the neuter to (tol; in all their inflections; the def. [definite] article; the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in
English idiom]: KJV - the, this, that, one, he, she, it, etc. Lord: Greek word #2962 kurios (koo-ree-os); from kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, i.e. (as
noun) controller; by implication, Mr. (as a respectful title): KJV - God, Lord, master, Sir. God: Greek word #2316 theos (theh'-os); of uncertain affinitys a deity, especially (with NT:3588 [the
definite article]) the supreme Divinity; figuratively, a magistrate; by Hebraism, very KJV
I don't understand what all of that means.
I meant about what you posted in your previous post.It simply means Jesus is God
Isaiah 9:6
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace
I meant about what you posted in your previous post.
No. You posted a verse and a bunch of text that I saw no relation to. I don't know how to respond when things are so unclear.Are you referring to definite article?
No. You posted a verse and a bunch of text that I saw no relation to. I don't know how to respond when things are so unclear.
#364.What post are you referring too? Better yet what # perhaps I can elaborate.
#364.
Your language is not in order, but your conclusion is either correct or not.When Thomas was speaking to Jesus, he called Jesus God.
One of the reasons we know Thomas meant God the almighty, is the word "God" is Theós (God, the One Lord God).
What is confusing?
Your language is not in order, but your conclusion is either correct or not.
I don't have the same way of looking at things, but you may be correct. I just don't know.Forgive me… But I never knew language had an order. And how would one go about correcting this?
But I believe that He is also the Son of God.
Yes. Although by saying the Old Testament you may be referring to the TaNaKh, which is not a covenant at all.do you believe He was the Old Testament prophesied Messiah to Come?
I don't have the same way of looking at things, but you may be correct. I just don't know.
I believe that either Jesus is a Mighty God or Jesus has the name that declares God to be Mighty God. For example, Jesus is not Everlasting Father. This may be another difficult one. The Hebrew reveals something entirely different when you are reading from a Jewish text, but I don't know Hebrew well enough to tell you what it is.
Because the Hebrew does not match the Christian texts. I do not have the same book with me any longer.If you can’t tell what it is, then how can you say it’s different?
all throughout the Tanakh, that included specifically the Prophets, the term, ""Son of Man," which is God as a Man, is a prophecy in the Old Testament.Yes. Although by saying the Old Testament you may be referring to the TaNaKh, which is not a covenant at all.