(Spirit to Father about Son saving us)
20:9 Save, YHVH!
Let the King answer us when we call!
um... why would the Father and the Spirit be calling on the Son to save them??
(Spirit to Father about Son saving us)
20:9 Save, YHVH!
Let the King answer us when we call!
true my greek is not good but sir you cannot explain that chapter..thats why you would trust commentators rather than the word...God did not like make a complex codex...i mean its complex for others but .. I dont think His intention is to confuse us ..most people dont want to belive that Jesus can actually be the father ...im not judging them but from the reading of this verses and reading other verses we get to its true....the son is that man Jesus Christ.God judges no one....he has commissioned all judgement to his son...and who is the son...The man Jesus Christ....you see problem with trinitarians is they to isolate Jesus from the Father and when Jesus has been portrayed as the Father they say its just part of the trinity....you want to prove this Theory of mine....
explain this verse...
This is He who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who bears witness, because the Spirit is truth. 7 For there are three that bear witness [b]in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit;
Was Jesus Christ 100% human. Yes or no.
So why can't the 100% human, Jesus, pray to the Father without Jesus talking to Himself?Absolutely. Do you expect me to say that He's 50% man?
So why can't the 100% human, Jesus, pray to the Father without Jesus talking to Himself?
I'm not the one saying Christ spoke to Himself. I am not the Modalist ("Unitarian"). I am Trinitarian.
While on earth, Christ prayed to the Father, who is both, numerically and personally distinct. Christ did not simultaneously exist in "heaven" as "the Father," and on the "earth" as "the Son," as Modalists would like you to believe.
At no point in history, at no point in eternality, and at no point in the days to come, has Jesus ever pre-existed as the Father. He has always been with the Father in a "You," "I," "Me," "We," "Our" relationship. Hence, in passages like Phil. 2:7, prior to Christ "coming in the likeness of men," He "contemplated" His "equality with God" (Phil. 2:6).
"Equality with God" prior to "coming in the likeness of men" can only mean one thing: Christ existed with God the Father. And it was Christ (not the Father) that assumed flesh. Therefore, there is no need to see Christ praying to Himself when He and the Father have been numerically and personally distinct the entire time.
Isaiah 64:8At no point in history, at no point in eternality, and at no point in the days to come, has Jesus ever pre-existed as the Father. He has always been with the Father in a "You," "I," "Me," "We," "Our" relationship. Hence, in passages like Phil. 2:7, prior to Christ "coming in the likeness of men," He "contemplated" His "equality with God" (Phil. 2:6).
Mud piesSo why do some people on this forum insist Jesus as a man can't pray to the Father. Did not Jesus as a man grow in knowledge?
What was created from dust?
What are the characteristics of a person?God is never described as a person in the Bible. Only humans in the Bible are persons.
Exo 20:3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.Do you believe they are not contradictory? Why?
Do you rely on faith to believe they are consistent with each other? Is that an excuse or a reason?
Inquiring minds want to know! Leave your answers below, eh.
Can you please explain the "numerically distinct" comment? Apologies if you already did. Thank youI'm not the one saying Christ spoke to Himself. I am not the Modalist ("Unitarian"). I am Trinitarian.
While on earth, Christ prayed to the Father, who is both, numerically and personally distinct. Christ did not simultaneously exist in "heaven" as "the Father," and on the "earth" as "the Son," as Modalists would like you to believe.
At no point in history, at no point in eternality, and at no point in the days to come, has Jesus ever pre-existed as the Father. He has always been with the Father in a "You," "I," "Me," "We," "Our" relationship. Hence, in passages like Phil. 2:7, prior to Christ "coming in the likeness of men," He "contemplated" His "equality with God" (Phil. 2:6).
"Equality with God" prior to "coming in the likeness of men" can only mean one thing: Christ existed with God the Father. And it was Christ (not the Father) that assumed flesh. Therefore, there is no need to see Christ praying to Himself when He and the Father have been numerically and personally distinct the entire time.
Genesis 1:27
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
Hello stilllearning, always lovely to see you and hear your thoughts on a matter. I have been thinking about this "in the image of God" idea a bit of late also, because in Ezekiel we are told the entities which Ezekiel encountered were in the image of a man, and yet they each had four faces, feet like the hooves of calves, wings studded with eyes under which were hands, etc. LOL. How like a man is that really? .
Many say being made in the image of God means something tripartite such as soul spirit emotions, and yet really the Bible does not articulate what it means at all beyond saying we were created in His image. I can think of that as being the image He held of how it would be, such as when an artist has an image of something in their mind and creates a likeness of it to represent it, something which may or may not resemble the artist in any way. Just a few random thoughts on the matter .. I do hope you are well .
![]()
I always appreciate the kindness you are and the kindness you ever show. I hope your weekend is a blessing my dear friend.
Glad you agree.True but ask yourself this could Jesus have turned the stones to bread and why didn't he do that....Yes Jesus could turn the stones to bread he had the power...he created the universe with his word ,surely turning stones to bread wouldn't take a second to do that but what would have been doing the will of the evil one....
Yes God cannot sin because he is Holy....but then if it concerns something to glorify himself or his name or to fulfill his will, he can do that because he is all powerful...but if it doesn't bring any value to his will or name then what would be the purpose of showing his power....it's like saying if God is powerful he can change into a Camel....but what would be the purpose of doing that....
Glad you agree.
God has revealed that He has always been and always will be trinitarian by nature. So it will never change. Similarly,
God has revealed that He has always been and always will be morally good. So that also will never change.
When you look at how God describes Himself in the Scriptures, its important to note which things are described as eternally existing, or temporally existing (e.g., decisions).
God is limited by His own nature because the divine attributes of God are unchanging. If that weren't the case, then God could lie and go back on His word and become evil, and therefore, could not be 100% trustworthy.
One of the prophets of God was called a god and it was the same word Elohim.
Exodus 7:1 KJVsource?
Exodus 7:1 KJV
1 And the Lord said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet.
Do you reject everything the Bible infers but does not explicitly state?We Well I agree with the omnipotence part but the Trinity part.....nope because first of all it's infered but not provided for in scripture