What do you believe then? Unitarianism? Oneness?The trinity is from the minds of men, not from God of the Bible. Yes, one can be a Christian and deny a false teaching such as the trinity.
What do you believe then? Unitarianism? Oneness?The trinity is from the minds of men, not from God of the Bible. Yes, one can be a Christian and deny a false teaching such as the trinity.
here we go again, how many times to we have to see people lowered on behalf of the holy spirit3 persons is from the minds of men. God is spirit.
What do you believe then? Unitarianism? Oneness?
Isaiah 9:6 KJV
6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
John 14:9 KJV
9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
Colossians 2:9 KJV
9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Clearly you don't know the difference between the Son of man and the Son of God. Again, your using your own mind to interpret Scripture. "Distinct persons" is not in the Bible. It's from your mind.After reading this your I'll bet your a Oneness Pentecostal, am I right? The reason I know is that you believe that Jesus Christ is actually God the Father from the verses you quoted. The technical term for your beliefs is "Modalism." This means the persons of the Trinity represent only three "modes" or aspect5s of the divine revelation, not three distinct and coexisting person in the Godhead/divine nature.
Here is how your belief is portrayed. "I'm a father, I'm also a son to my father and I'm a husband to my wife and yet I'm one and the same me." Years ago I debated a Oneness and he said Jesus is all of them. Meaning Jesus is God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Of course the Bible easily disputes this heresy. For one, your comparing "offices" with ontological beings. What if the person never gets married? Logically he could not be a husband. Or if the person never had children he could not be in the office of a father. Also, Mark 1:11 gives Oneness Pentecostal fits. "and a voice came out of the heavens; "Thou art My beloved Son, in Thee I am well-pleased." Tell me how you reconcile this with "modalism?" If Jesus is the Father and the Son in your theology is Jesus speaking to Himself in both roles?
You then mentioned John 14:9. If you would have bothered to read farther down to vs10, "Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me? There are two distinct persons in this verse, God the Father and God the Son. There are not one and the same person as you teach.
Moving on down to vs14-16 these verses make even worse for you. "Vs14, "If you ask anything in My name, I will do it. vs15, if you love Me you will keep My commandments. Vs16, And I will ask the Father, (one person) and He will give you another Helper, (second person) that He may be with you forever." The first person speaking is Jesus following by two other persons, hence the trinity of persons.
How about more proof that makes a distinction of persons. John 14:23, "Jesus answered and said to him, ":If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word and My Father will love him and We will come to him, AND MAKE OUR ABODE WITH HIM." You have two persons that are both 9according to the Bible) identified as the one God by nature living in a believer.
If your theology is right, why does the Bible bother to say two distinct persons will live in a believer at least as this verse? Don't forget the Holy Spirit will be with the believer as well. John 14:16. Prove the Bible wrong Saul-to-Paul?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
So Oneness it is, gotcha.Isaiah 9:6 KJV
6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
John 14:9 KJV
9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
Colossians 2:9 KJV
9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Clearly you don't know the difference between the Son of man and the Son of God. Again, your using your own mind to interpret Scripture. "Distinct persons" is not in the Bible. It's from your mind.
Well tell me this Saul-to-Paul, why did Jesus Christ Himself often times refer to Himself as the "Son of God" and as the "Son of Man?"
He's the Son of God on His Father's side who's nature is deity. He's the Son of Man on His mother's side who's nature is human. It's a universal law that all sons bear the nature of their fathers. In other words, our nature distinguishes us from all that is not human. The Father, Son and Holy Spirits nature distinguishes the three persons of the Godhead from all that is not God.
Dogs have baby dogs, beavers produce other beavers and so on. So, how can you post this nonsense with a straight face that Jesus the Son of God in your heretical theology actually is or plays the role of the Father and Holy Spirit? Rember, I gave you Mark 1:11 where God the Father calls out from the heavens to His only begotten Son and says He is "well-pleased" with Him. Two persons and not one person who at the same time is both the Son and the Father. In your theology please reconcile this (apparent) giant contradiction?
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
You would not recognize if it stared you in the face.Give me the Bible verse that say God is 3 distinct persons.
Fruitless comment.You would not recognize if it stared you in the face.
All you're doing self interpreting Scripture. In your mind you see God speak to His Son and you're making that 2 different persons.
Give me the Bible verse that say God is 3 distinct persons.
I gave you Isaiah 9:6 that clearly shows Jesus is the everlasting Father.
Jhn 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
I know how people try to attribute this to Jesus Christ … But that is biblically wrong.
Nice self interpretations. Proving you worship 3 deities.No, the term "Everlasting Father" is NOT teaching that Jesus Christ is God the Father. The Hebrew phrase translated “Everlasting Father” could be translated literally “Father of Eternity.” For this reason, some have suggested that the title means that this coming Messiah is also the creator of everything: He is the father of time and eternity, the “architect of the ages.” While we know this to be true from the New Testament (John 1:1–3, Colossians 1:16–17), that is not the emphasis in Isaiah. In the Hebrew construction of the phrase, father is the primary noun, and everlasting (ESV, NIV, KJV) or eternal (NASB) is the term that describes His fatherhood. He is Father.
The meaning of the title "Everlasting Father" is akin to saying George Washing is the father or our country. In other words Washington played a key role in the founding of the United States and led convention that wrote the U.S Constitution. Also notice in the body of this post the phrase "architect of the ages." This means Jesus Christ is the creator and one of the verses that backs this up is Revelation 3:14.
"The Amen, the faithful and true witness, the Beginning of the creation of God, says this." The Jehovah's Witnesses love to latch on to this verse to prove Jesus is a creating being. This is "NOT" the case. In the Greek language that word "Beginning" is "arche." We get our English word "architect" from that word. So what is an architect? The person who is qualified to design and plans or draws up the plans of something to be built.
This verse to is backed up by John 1:3, Colossians 1:16-17 and even by His own Father at Hebrews 1:10 where He says, "And, Thou Lord, in the Beginning/arche didst lay the foundation of the earth, And the heavens are the works of Thy hands." So for a change, why don't you take the time to "THINK'" and look up the verses quoted and read them in their context. Words have meaning, and their meaning is determined by the context. You just said that at Isaiah 9:6 proves Jesus is God the Father because it says, "Everlasting Father." If I was to use the word "bark" you would not know if I meant the bark of a dog or the bark of a tree unless it was used in context of a sentence. In short, at least try and do some homework and look these things up in Lexicon's and Commentaries.
For example, beginning as I stated is the Greek word "arche." Please read: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g746/kjv/tr/0-1/
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
God awful. That's 3 gods. That's heathenism.What is the Trinity?
one God in three persons (one being or essence with 3 personalities)
This is a good example of willful blindness leading to stupidity. You could go and join the Muslims.God awful. That's 3 gods. That's heathenism.
Nice self interpretations. Proving you worship 3 deities.
An heretic after the first and second admonition REJECT. We are not obligated to keep on discussing Bible truth with heretics.It's also rather obvious that no matter what I say or post scripture you will only bring to the table "heretical" opinions.