That faith is present and active. And I appreciate you asking for clarification.Before I respond, please define what you mean by "the operation of faith"?
That faith is present and active. And I appreciate you asking for clarification.Before I respond, please define what you mean by "the operation of faith"?
"their response was what is the proper response." And that response was to be baptized for the remission of sins (verse 38). So are we in agreement?In the KJV verse 37 reads...When they heard this, they were pricked in their hearts, and said men and brethren, what shall we do?
Before they are told what to do they heard the word of God...faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Faith is already present. They were also pricked in their hearts. This is the circumcision of the heart pictured in physical circumcision. It is what Ezekiel 36:26 is describing in taking out the heart of stone and giving a heart of flesh.
In this condition, their response was what is the proper response. This isn't surprising given that faith always calls for a response. Plenty of other people heard the same words and did not respond this way. Why? Because the operation of faith was not present in them.
I'M FINE. it's sad that when those like you choose to mock and scoff and seek to debate, such things are salvation with those who also claim to be saved. I find that not ok. But it is ok, please ensure yourself."I would say there is no salvation without BOTH, and they are SIMULTANEOUS." I don't even know what this means.
"LOL hahahaha" Um...are you o.k.?
"I would say there is no salvation without BOTH, and they are SIMULTANEOUS." I don't even know what this means.
"LOL hahahaha" Um...are you o.k.?
We agree that where faith has been demonstrated baptism should follow. We have very different understanding of the nature of salvation."their response was what is the proper response." And that response was to be baptized for the remission of sins (verse 38). So are we in agreement?
On the reason why I did not respond to the whole of what you wrote is because I agree with most of it. I do think that the following is a bit of a stretch.We agree that where faith has been demonstrated baptism should follow. We have very different understanding of the nature of salvation.
I'm curious why you didn't address the whole of what I wrote. I personally think it's clear from verse 37 that God is already at work in those who come to faith. That they heard is evidence that their minds have become engaged. That they were pricked is evidence that their hearts were engaged. That they were responding means their wills were engaged. What is the cause of these changes?
Again I appreciate the response and I have a few questions if you are so inclined to answer.On the reason why I did not respond to the whole of what you wrote is because I agree with most of it. I do think that the following is a bit of a stretch.
"This is the circumcision of the heart pictured in physical circumcision. It is what Ezekiel 36:26 is describing in taking out the heart of stone and giving a heart of flesh."
But regardless of how much "their wills were engaged" the lack of the remission of sins is the road to damnation.
What is your understanding of their hearts being pricked? Express feelings of guilt. What do you think it means?Again I appreciate the response and I have a few questions if you are so inclined to answer.
What is your understanding of their hearts being pricked? What is transpiring in a heart being pricked? And who is doing the pricking? And what is Ezekiel referring to by taking out the heart of stone and giving a heart of flesh?
And lastly, and I hope by asking so many questions I'm not presuming upon your time, do you believe salvation is a physical or spiritual transaction?
do you believe salvation is a physical or spiritual transaction? Salvation in our present place and time is metaphysical and as such can not be proven. It has both physical aspects (water baptism, confessing Jesus as Lord) as well as spiritual aspects (faith, repentance and grace).Again I appreciate the response and I have a few questions if you are so inclined to answer.
What is your understanding of their hearts being pricked? What is transpiring in a heart being pricked? And who is doing the pricking? And what is Ezekiel referring to by taking out the heart of stone and giving a heart of flesh?
And lastly, and I hope by asking so many questions I'm not presuming upon your time, do you believe salvation is a physical or spiritual transaction?
You write "LOL hahahaha" and I am doing the mocking??? Are you serious?I'M FINE. it's sad that when those like you choose to mock and scoff and seek to debate, such things are salvation with those who also claim to be saved. I find that not ok. But it is ok, please ensure yourself.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. I should have asked the last question first. Salvation is primarily a spiritual endeavor. Those who are dead spiritually are made alive. The Bible describes this in a number of ways, each designed to give a fuller understanding of it. Such phrases as being rescued from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of light, being born again or born from above, knowing the one true God and Jesus Christ. None of these descriptions have physical reality. We aren't literally taken from a place of darkness, experience a second birth, or come face to face with Jesus. So whatever these things are suggesting, it must be spiritual.What is your understanding of their hearts being pricked? Express feelings of guilt. What do you think it means?
What is transpiring in a heart being pricked? Express feelings of guilt.
And who is doing the pricking? Their conscience. What do you think is causing it?
And what is Ezekiel referring to by taking out the heart of stone and giving a heart of flesh? This was one of the acts of God toward the people of Israel, to prick their conscience in order for them to see their own shame. (Ezekiel 36:32) What do you think it is referring to?
and what happens then if man has true saving faith in Christ, is all lined up to get baptized tomorrow but dies of a heart attack preventing him from getting baptized. To stay intellectually honest you have to say this man goes to hell. Does that make sense to you?"Now what is the cut off line in terms of good works does one need to know they're saved?"
Here is your answer. As I have said many times before, there are no good works needed to be saved.
I have answered your question now answer mine.
Good point.... and it follows that, if hearing and believing were all there is to it, then Peter would have said "what should you do? Nothing! You're done! You have heard, and you have faith, that's all you need! "In the KJV verse 37 reads...When they heard this, they were pricked in their hearts, and said men and brethren, what shall we do?
Before they are told what to do they heard the word of God...faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Faith is already present. They were also pricked in their hearts. This is the circumcision of the heart pictured in physical circumcision. It is what Ezekiel 36:26 is describing in taking out the heart of stone and giving a heart of flesh.
In this condition, their response was what is the proper response. This isn't surprising given that faith always calls for a response. Plenty of other people heard the same words and did not respond this way. Why? Because the operation of faith was not present in them.
You seem to want to play "hypothetical" games.... you also still grant men authority that we don't have, and never will....and what happens then if man has true saving faith in Christ, is all lined up to get baptized tomorrow but dies of a heart attack preventing him from getting baptized. To stay intellectually honest you have to say this man goes to hell. Does that make sense to you?
In my post #410 I asked you to please provide scriptures regarding your position that the blood of Christ is applied to the soul and one's sins are forgiven upon repentance. I ask again, since I find that no where in scripture. However, the bible does say everyone is to repent, AND be baptized in the name of Jesus for remission of sin. The referenced baptism is water baptism as revealed in Acts 10:47-48. And since scripture links remission of sin with those commands it is plausible that the blood of Christ is applied at that point.You continue to promote your false ideas about baptism. But those who know what is actually written reject that nonsense. When a sinner repents, his sins are forgiven and the blood of Christ is applied to his soul. He is "washed" internally of his sins and his guilt. This has nothing to do with baptism with water. There are many other spiritual things which also happen at the same time.
Yes.... and even if we cannot pinpoint the exact moment that "being saved" happens, we CAN, and should, follow what all the scriptures say is a part of that process...In my post #410 I asked you to please provide scriptures regarding your position that the blood of Christ is applied to the soul and one's sins are forgiven upon repentance. I ask again, since I find that no where in scripture. However, the bible does say everyone is to repent, AND be baptized in the name of Jesus for remission of sin. The referenced baptism is water baptism as revealed in Acts 10:47-48. And since scripture links remission of sin with those commands it is plausible that the blood of Christ is applied at that point.
Paul's words come to mind. There are stepS of faith revealed in the gospel message. One step of faith propels one to the next, and the next, and so on.Good point.... and it follows that, if hearing and believing were all there is to it, then Peter would have said "what should you do? Nothing! You're done! You have heard, and you have faith, that's all you need! "
What did Peter tell the crowd of new believers?
Baptism is in the bible for a reason but you and others ignor and/or disregard it and claim it doesn't mean what it simply says. Tell the Lord it's meaningless.it's amazing to me that the you need to be baptized to go to Heaven crowd honestly thinks if a man truly accepted Christ as His savior, repented of his sins and is now lined up to get baptized but dies of a heart attack before he gets dunked is going to hell forever. To stay intellectually honest they have to take this position. Utter nonsense.
"but he that believeth not shall be damned."Baptism is in the bible for a reason but you and others ignor and/or disregard it and claim it doesn't mean what it simply says. Tell the Lord it's meaningless.
Mark 16:15-16
15And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. 16He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
The above is pretty simple znd clear in Jesus own words. Jesus appears to have been important to the Lord.
belief + baptism = salvation
Belief is inextricably linked to baptism, one being dependent upon the other tied together by a conjunction. It can't get any simpler or clearer than that!
Why not? I can make that call quite easily. Watch:You seem to want to play "hypothetical" games.... you also still grant men authority that we don't have, and never will....
It is not our place to tell someone they are going to hell.... please, PLEASE get that out of your mind. We don't have that authority.
All we can do is give someone the word of God.... what happens in their life is between them and our loving God.
Telling someone they are going to hell has nothing to do with being intellectually honest....
I've heard all the hypotheticals.... what about the thief on the cross, what about the soldier in battle, what about the person driving on their way to be baptized and they have a wreck, what about an astronaut in space.... yada, yada, ad nauseum....
One more time.....THAT IS NOT OUR CALL TO MAKE. GOD MAKES THAT CALL. We don't have to worry that we are being "intellectually honest", because we do not know what will happen to that person.... but I DO know who DOES know, and I know that He loves us more than we are capable of loving ourselves.
So, how 'bout we stop with the silly games, bro? It's a waste of time...