How is that relevant? The RSV is not the REV.The Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition (RSV-CE) is a Bible translation approved for use by the Catholic Church
You need to be more careful in digging for your dirt.
How is that relevant? The RSV is not the REV.The Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition (RSV-CE) is a Bible translation approved for use by the Catholic Church
CatholicsHow is that relevant? The RSV is not the REV.
You need to be more careful in digging for your dirt.
Again, how is that relevant?Catholics
[T]he Revised Standard Version of 1946–1957 was becoming established and, in 1966, was accepted by Catholics
It says the Revised STANDARD Version is a Catholic Bible.it says the revised english version is a Catholic Bible
...and the Revised English Bible (REB) is yet ANOTHER translation.it says both Catholic and Episcopals.
any Episcopals using the Revised English Bible?
I'm willing to use the KJV.yea RSV is not the same as REV
You can go online and see they are different. But if you going to discuss or argue something from scripture how bout you both use the same translation?
Simple?
Watcher, there is a LOT more to this than one verse, especially if the verse can be translated in different ways. Don't build a theology on one verse.ok, so, of every Bible out there that has basically the SAME TRANSLATION, you choose the 2 that changes Verse 13?
this is the Verse that is being debated, is why.Watcher, there is a LOT more to this than one verse, especially if the verse can be translated in different ways. Don't build a theology on one verse.
The REV is not associated with the REB or the RSV in any way.search revised English Version: it says it's a part of REB and the other i listed.
so, if it's part of those Bibles why say it's not?
It has to fit with the rest of scripture.this is the Verse that is being debated, is why.
if 100 translations has it one way but a lone wolf has it another way, why would YOU CHOOSE the one that is different?