G
Let's examine the lie that you have to have a digital ID injected into a person to catch these criminals because they were wearing masks.
1. They arrested more than 30 people. Look at their phone records, see what they have posted online, investigate all their contacts and those who respond to their posts.
2. Use geotagging, many people probably had their phones on them. You can locate people within 10 feet of their location with a time stamp. Therefore you will have hundreds more that you can investigate. You can subpoena their phones for pictures they may have taken. You can investigate their phone calls, text messages, emails and online posts.
Put those two together and you should be able to get over 100 people that you can charge with crimes but then you go hard on them questioning them, showing phone records. Expert interrogators can get a whole lot more information. You can also have enough evidence to pull in another 100 people who you strongly suspect of crimes, and again, interrogators can do a wonderful job of getting information from people, making them sweat, thinking they are being ratted out, and you will get more confessions and witnesses. If you are serious about this the 30+ who have been arrested can turn into 120 who are convicted.
Now suppose five people come from the same mosque, that in turn gives the government sufficient evidence to subpoena a whole lot more, put undercover agents into that mosque, and investigate everyone who attends that mosque especially background, where they came from, are they coordinating with anyone overseas.
My point is that in addition to the 120 who get felonies on their record and spend at least six months in jail you can also get tremendous information for a much wider net. Over the next two years if it was a serious goal you could probably identify everyone who was at these protests, everyone who organized them, and everyone who is inciting them.
But instead you will give the government this massive power of injecting digital ids into each person like you would with a cow and letting them control your entire life.
1. They arrested more than 30 people. Look at their phone records, see what they have posted online, investigate all their contacts and those who respond to their posts.
2. Use geotagging, many people probably had their phones on them. You can locate people within 10 feet of their location with a time stamp. Therefore you will have hundreds more that you can investigate. You can subpoena their phones for pictures they may have taken. You can investigate their phone calls, text messages, emails and online posts.
Put those two together and you should be able to get over 100 people that you can charge with crimes but then you go hard on them questioning them, showing phone records. Expert interrogators can get a whole lot more information. You can also have enough evidence to pull in another 100 people who you strongly suspect of crimes, and again, interrogators can do a wonderful job of getting information from people, making them sweat, thinking they are being ratted out, and you will get more confessions and witnesses. If you are serious about this the 30+ who have been arrested can turn into 120 who are convicted.
Now suppose five people come from the same mosque, that in turn gives the government sufficient evidence to subpoena a whole lot more, put undercover agents into that mosque, and investigate everyone who attends that mosque especially background, where they came from, are they coordinating with anyone overseas.
My point is that in addition to the 120 who get felonies on their record and spend at least six months in jail you can also get tremendous information for a much wider net. Over the next two years if it was a serious goal you could probably identify everyone who was at these protests, everyone who organized them, and everyone who is inciting them.
But instead you will give the government this massive power of injecting digital ids into each person like you would with a cow and letting them control your entire life.
- 1
- Show all