Does anyone really want to discuss Gen 1:1 and what it truly means?
I do. But others keep twisting the discussion away.
Does anyone really want to discuss Gen 1:1 and what it truly means?
The Three have always existed as a Trinity.
Father, Son, Holy Ghost.
Trinity to infinity... and from infinity.
The Three agree.
One of the purposes of Jesus becoming man was to be an example for us to follow. Jesus and the Holy Spirit always were, still are, and always will be God.But one commands and the other two obey.
"Science" (so called) has no idea about "Origens", but a box lot of "Theories".Just wondering about some input to stimulate this group. Does it support science?
As well as defining the bounds of the Hebrew day with "evening and morning" (sunset to sunset). That is why even to this day the Jews observe the seventh day Sabbath from sunset to sunset.Secular science wants you to think there is a gap. But there is none. The Hebrew word for day means a 24 hour period used in this context. and nothing else.
One of the purposes of Jesus becoming man was to be an example for us to follow. Jesus and the Holy Spirit always were, still are, and always will be God.
Probably the most persuasive argument for the existence of God -- I don’t mean to philosophers and logicians, but to ordinary people -- goes something like this: All of this -- that is, a world with life, intelligence, beauty, humans, morality, etc., -- couldn’t have come about by accident. It must be due to some intelligent, powerful Being -- and that’s what God is.I read some good material on Lan Seconds and how time is not constant, especially in the presence of Antimatter. The physics supports 6 day creation. The math doesn't lie. Yes Antimatter is created during Nuclear Fission and matter is destroyed so antimatter is fact. Im not qualified to get my head around what I read. Im an Electronics Engineer, but what little I did understand, made perfect sense. Yes Science has evidence of Supernatural(Devine) Creation. I wish I could recall the Authors I read on the subject. I would post links. There is a lot of articles on the Net that say the same things.
Probably the most persuasive argument for the existence of God -- I don’t mean to philosophers and logicians, but to ordinary people -- goes something like this: All of this -- that is, a world with life, intelligence, beauty, humans, morality, etc., -- couldn’t have come about by accident. It must be due to some intelligent, powerful Being -- and that’s what God is.
The fine-tuning argument is a modern, up-to-date version of this argument. It takes off from something that serious physicists, religious or not, tend to agree on. Here’s how Freeman Dyson put it:
"There are many . . . lucky accidents in physics. Without such accidents, water could not exist as liquid, chains of carbon atoms could not form complex organic molecules, and hydrogen atoms could not form breakable bridges between molecules" (p. 251)--in short, life as we know it would be impossible.
All these things Freeman Dysan calls lucky accidents --- which include the initial distribution of matter when the Big Bang banged --- and values of some fundamental constants --- can be thought of the universe as being fine-tuned so as to allow for the emergence of life and all those other good things that come with it.
Then the argument is: Isn’t it more plausible to suppose that these things were not accidents, but happened according to a plan of some intelligent being? If I found an aquarium in your house, with water and plants and food in the just combination required to keep goldfish happy, I might reasonably infer that someone put it there because they wanted goldfish, not that it occurred by accident. Similarly (a bit) the universe has ended up with a little aquarium for humans, reason and morality, namely, our earth So isn’t it reasonable to suppose that, rather than being an accident, things were set up to allow for this development?
But such fine-tuning, in order to make life possible, requires a fine-tuner. This would have to be some Being with incredible knowledge and power. That seems to amount to God, or at least a God. (Philosophytalk.org)
Jesus came down into the form and likeness of man and humbled Himself as a servant so that we might have an example to pattern our lives after. He made Himself into the likeness of a servant for us.That still does not change the fact that one commands and the other two obey.
is it ok if I go all science on you ?.You will discover true Science always verifies the Word of God because the Word of God is the Inspired Truth.
Jesus said God made Male and Female and the union of both create Life.
Homosexuals claim Science proves they are genetically designed and created naturally.
But let's take a very quick look at Evolution.
Let's get to the heart of the matter and begin with NATURAL SELECTION:
NATURAL SELECTION is picking and choosing random genetitics and traits to continue the evolving Species. That means NATURAL SELECTION would kill any homosexual genetics because those genetitics produce the Species that cannot keep the Tree of Life ALIVE.
So NATURAL SELECTION would destroy any genetitics that desired same sex and would not help to continue the Species chances for survival by continuing to produce life.
Truly, Evolution is another tool that shows us God's Word is Truth and for a Species to survive means it requires Male and Female attracted to one another.
where is the "Various interpretations or theories.Various interpretations or theories are not worth debating, prefer to stick to Scripture and defining as accurately as possible its meaning, by comparing Scripture with Scripture. For the Scriptures tell us all we need to know.
Where does the Bible say this ^^^?Quite simply, GOD created 2 places: the Heaven, which is where HE IS, and the earth, which is where HE wasnt.
where is the "Various interpretations or theories.Various interpretations or theories are not worth debating, prefer to stick to Scripture and defining as accurately as possible its meaning, by comparing Scripture with Scripture. For the Scriptures tell us all we need to know.