Three Questions for Calvinists

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Satan is not a man.
Not sure why you might think I was thinking that Satan was a man, but, I do wonder, Did Eve Disobey God, or was she Deceived by Satan, ultimately?

Did God remove A&E from the Garden, because, they were Deceived or because they Disobeyed?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,815
29,194
113
Not sure why you might think I was thinking that Satan was a man, but, I do wonder, Did Eve Disobey God, or was she Deceived by Satan, ultimately?

Did God remove A&E from the Garden, because, they were Deceived or because they Disobeyed?
Scripture asserts that Adam was not deceived, and supports Eve's claim that she was deceived. Both sinned.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,122
2,151
113
Are the thorns on a rose God's creation? Or is that the character of the rose?
the thorns on a rose are useful in protecting the rose, although vermin might consider them evil.
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
939
113
the thorns on a rose are useful in protecting the rose, although vermin might consider them evil.
your reply does not answer the question.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
If we say, God created Thorns on a Rose for its protection, then it takes away from the character of the Rose.
If we say, God created Thorns on a Rose for its character, then it takes away the purpose for protection.

What's still interesting here, with Thorns as possible Protection or Character, insects still devour the Rose unharmed.

I think the key here is what was God's intended use for a Rose?
He wasn't creating a Rose for women on Valentine's Day
So, why did God create the Rose?

Tree's provide shelter, homes, food.
Grass provide food and medicinal purposes.
Flowers feed insects and herbivores.
Is this why God made the Rose?
If so, why add Thorns to make the meal more challenging?
Clearly, the Thorns seem more to function for Protection, compared to Character.

Or, is God showing, how He loves Contrasting Concepts?
Beauty + Thorns
Beauty + Danger
Beauty + Protection
Beauty + Character
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,122
2,151
113
your reply does not answer the question.
Character meaning: the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual...
i.e., I normally don't entertain ridiculous questions, it goes against my character...
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
939
113
Beckie said:
Are the thorns on a rose God's creation? Or is that the character of the rose?

Character meaning: the mental and moral qualities distinctive to an individual...
i.e., I normally don't entertain ridiculous questions, it goes against my character...
Got the time to be snarky but still did not answer the question. Got it :)
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
939
113
If we say, God created Thorns on a Rose for its protection, then it takes away from the character of the Rose.
If we say, God created Thorns on a Rose for its character, then it takes away the purpose for protection.

What's still interesting here, with Thorns as possible Protection or Character, insects still devour the Rose unharmed.

I think the key here is what was God's intended use for a Rose?
He wasn't creating a Rose for women on Valentine's Day
So, why did God create the Rose?

Tree's provide shelter, homes, food.
Grass provide food and medicinal purposes.
Flowers feed insects and herbivores.
Is this why God made the Rose?
If so, why add Thorns to make the meal more challenging?
Clearly, the Thorns seem more to function for Protection, compared to Character.

Or, is God showing, how He loves Contrasting Concepts?
Beauty + Thorns
Beauty + Danger
Beauty + Protection
Beauty + Character
Thinking thorns came about as part of the curse
Gen 3:17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
Gen 3:18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
 

Shepherd

Active member
May 11, 2022
247
81
28
Magenta said:
Calvinists make God the author of evil.
Very profound statement. 💯
Calvininsts say that God's greatest desire is his own glory. But the Bible says the Jesus went to the cross "for the JOY set before Him". It says in another place that it is "His good pleasure to give you the Kingdom". God is a giver, not a taker. Calvinists actually portray a false god which is a selfish narcissist. Ironically, the God of the Bible does and will receive glory because He is worthy. A narcissist is never worthy of glory.
"And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man ....." Romans 1:23
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Thinking thorns came about as part of the curse
Gen 3:17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
Gen 3:18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
Forgot about this Post, Sorry!

I would have no problem believing this Theory, of yours!
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Why do you say the Scriptures are my theory?
I credit you for this insight.
If you thought about this first, it is your personal revelation from God.
I just call it a Theory, but when pertaining to God, a Theory, is absolute 100% Fact.
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
939
113
Sunday school taught me about 70 years ago the weeds thorns stickers etc came about of the fall . I have a vague memory of a rose being used as an example. Example of the beauty God gave us and what we did to it.
 
May 10, 2023
169
71
28
Calvininsts say that God's greatest desire is his own glory. But the Bible says the Jesus went to the cross "for the JOY set before Him". It says in another place that it is "His good pleasure to give you the Kingdom". God is a giver, not a taker. Calvinists actually portray a false god which is a selfish narcissist. Ironically, the God of the Bible does and will receive glory because He is worthy. A narcissist is never worthy of glory.
"And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man ....." Romans 1:23
@Shepherd, your post above is one of the greatest, most powerful posts I’ve ever read here. 100% truth.
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
939
113
Calvininsts say that God's greatest desire is his own glory. But the Bible says the Jesus went to the cross "for the JOY set before Him". It says in another place that it is "His good pleasure to give you the Kingdom". God is a giver, not a taker. Calvinists actually portray a false god which is a selfish narcissist. Ironically, the God of the Bible does and will receive glory because He is worthy. A narcissist is never worthy of glory.
"And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man ....." Romans 1:23
Rev 4:10 The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying,
Rev 4:11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
5,798
2,258
113
Calvininsts say that God's greatest desire is his own glory. But the Bible says the Jesus went to the cross "for the JOY set before Him". It says in another place that it is "His good pleasure to give you the Kingdom". God is a giver, not a taker. Calvinists actually portray a false god which is a selfish narcissist. Ironically, the God of the Bible does and will receive glory because He is worthy. A narcissist is never worthy of glory.
"And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man ....." Romans 1:23
God does create and give for His own pleasure which is He is entitled to do, He is God after all.

The god of Calvinism is does have some narcissistic traits, their god is a control freak, a puppet master.

I think if we understand Augustine and Calvin we will understand the god they created, the transference is remarkable.
 

Shepherd

Active member
May 11, 2022
247
81
28
Rev 4:10 The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying,
Rev 4:11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.
Yeah, that's what I said....
Ironically, the God of the Bible does and will receive glory because He is worthy.
...and what does He take pleasure in?
Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom. -Luke 12:32
....and what does that Kingdom consist of?
For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. -Romans 14:17
 

NOV25

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2019
977
386
63
Calvininsts say that God's greatest desire is his own glory. But the Bible says the Jesus went to the cross "for the JOY set before Him". It says in another place that it is "His good pleasure to give you the Kingdom". God is a giver, not a taker. Calvinists actually portray a false god which is a selfish narcissist. Ironically, the God of the Bible does and will receive glory because He is worthy. A narcissist is never worthy of glory.
"And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man ....." Romans 1:23
Yikes 😬
I hope you realize, if you’re wrong it means (by your own admission) you’re serving a false god and you just called the true God a selfish narcissist.

To all: It’s one thing to disagree with the doctrine of election out of ignorance, but it’s an entirely different thing to hate it (and the God who ordained it).

Be sure.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
To all: It’s one thing to disagree with the doctrine of election out of ignorance, but it’s an entirely different thing to hate it (and the God who ordained it).

Be sure.
Considering, this Doctrine comes out of a manuscript, not just deemed Un-Worthy of being in the Canon [Septuagint], because it is factually a simple bunch of human Opinions jotted down, means, I am not too concerned about the "god," these Opinions, are trying to pretend to be.

Is the Septuagint the same as the Tanakh?
The Septuagint does not consist of a single, unified corpus. Rather, it is a collection of ancient translations of the Tanakh, along with other Jewish texts that are now commonly referred to as apocrypha.

What does apocrypha mean?
apocrypha, (from Greek apokryptein, “to hide away”), in biblical literature, works outside an accepted canon of scripture. The history of the term's usage indicates that it referred to a body of esoteric writings that were at first prized, later tolerated, and finally excluded.

What is Esoteric Writings?

a personal interpretation!