In What Year Was the Whole Holy Bible Completed?
- Thread starter RaceRunner
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Ah well in this case that makes sense, and that again just typical editting that doesn't effect the substance of the text, which is of course that there is One True God and that he is the Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit and that The Holy Bible is an authentic and reliable account of ancient history on top of its religious significance.
Oh those are just the gnat-strainers, I personally highly doubt they ever read the entire Bible from cover to cover, much less different translations of it. I have and they all say the same thing, the story is intact is what I mean by the substance of the book. Editting to translations or scribal quirks are just superficial edits therefore if the story remains intact. The Holy Bible has been inspired by God, written by holy men, transcribed, translated, and transmitted faithfully.
It is not my intention to question the holiness of the authors, but I wouldn't consider it straining at a gnat to question the common understanding of the word "holy" even. For example, Israel is considered a holy nation but often behaved in an ungodly manner. Do we have the most accurate understanding of it?
-
1
- Show all
Well maybe that's just moreso a judgement against the modern society being so unholy that they have no idea what holy means anymore lol. Not saying nor implying you are, but from my experience such types and arguments moreso. Reality isn't subjective, holy means what it has always meant, hallowed, sanctified, set apart. The gnat strainers are often of the scribal persuasion lol how they argue over synonyms and are blind to the forest for straining their eyes at the trees.
Yea of course. Those are two different things though. What is holy is pure, set apart, right? So there is no trying to be holy unless you're already already polluted, defiled, and unholy therefore. This is discussed much in whole The Holy Bible. But then that's a whole big subject and topic of itself. Suffice for this topic 300-399 AD seems still to me the best poll vote.
