wow talk about not caring if your wrong, but you sir really have excelled in this field.
You've ignored at least 20 good reasons that prove the theories of what your basing your information on don't hold substance to your claim.
I don't typically engage with elephant hurlers. Name one or two of your best arguments, and if you're genuine, I might show you how they're wrong. You produce a list of chaff, and most won't bother.
Sir are you also going to dismiss Google earth and satellite data, plus live broadcasts from space stations in space.
Google Earth is a collection of photographs. Which are flat...
Are you going to ignor 60 years of documentaries, plus how children are taught at school how our planet works ?
Appeal to authority or bandwagon. A logical fallacy, either way.
Sir your probably in a 0.1% margin with your belief out of the entire population of aldults on our planet with your beliefs.
Thank you. I like to believe I'm above average in some things.
Why would you want to be so different to popular belief and proven science ?.
Truth is more important to me than popularity.
Because the bible said God made the sun stand still and left the earth part out ?.
Arguing from the silence of scripture?
Sir this is no reason to prove the earth is flat.
You mistake the burden of proof here. Flat Earth is an observation. Ball Earth is your claim, and it is you who need to prove it, as the default is our observation, that the Earth is flat.
You really have lost it friend.
Projection.
A statement of fact does not need to have explicit biblical support. Male humans produce sperm and female humans produce eggs. Two of them, one of each kind, join together to make a zygote; the Bible says no such thing, but it is true nonetheless.
Genesis 1:27-28 So God created man in his
own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
Um, no. God is not limited by physics at all. If He were, the event would not have happened at all.
I didn't say He was limited by physics. The event was real, and God stopped the sun, which implies that it was the sun which was (and still is to this day) moving.
None of these directly precludes heliocentricity. It's only your misunderstanding of them that does so.
You don't need to accept it, but they do.
There are scientifically sound explanations for the first two assertions; some people hold to the third but I don't as I see no need for it.
I outlined the valid scientific explanations. They are lacking philosophically, and/or in what we know of the nature of God.
You might think your statement is a valid argument, but it isn't. You are pretending that you have proven (or that someone else has) that stars are closer and that heliocentric theory has been disproven. That's the essence of circular reasoning.
You forget the burden of proof. I don't need to prove Flat Earth. It is an observation. Failure to prove ball-Earth - which you have thus far failed to prove - results in acceptance of what we observe, which is Flat Earth. No circular reasoning required.
Congratulations. I hope you enjoy being right for once.
You are making an error of scale. The sun is billions of times brighter than a weak torch, and the degree to which the atmosphere inhibits light is not billions of times greater at the distances under discussion.
And yet the same physics apply, just on a greater scale. Science.
This does not come from nor does it describe literal light and darkness; it is a philosophical axiom based (ultimately) on the nature of sin-ridden yet God-created humanity.
Opinion.
This is either sheer arrogance or blatant ignorance. Flat earth is not "an observation" but an interpretation based on misinterpretation of Scripture (for those who believe in Scripture) or science (for those who don't).
It is very much an observation. Indeed, one of the main excuses of heliocentrists is that we can't see the curvature of the Earth because we are not high enough. Lol.
I observe conditions in the real world that are consistent with a globe earth and inconsistent with a flat earth.
No. You apply a heliocentric theory to explain conditions in the real world that you believe are consistent with a globe Earth, and which you believe are inconsistent with a Flat Earth. What you observe is still a Flat Earth.