So, baptism is the fulfillment of the type, and also saves.Antitype doesn't mean symbol. An antitype is the fulfillment of a type; the type is the symbol. There were many types of Christ in the Tanakh; Jesus was the antitype.
So, baptism is the fulfillment of the type, and also saves.Antitype doesn't mean symbol. An antitype is the fulfillment of a type; the type is the symbol. There were many types of Christ in the Tanakh; Jesus was the antitype.
I didn't say that they teach everything I do.Let us believe you made a mistake when you said Chuck Smith and the entire C Chapel movement teach what you do. We will just pretend that is not what you really said as if you did say that, you either deliberately lied or you are also confused as to what is taught
The following is from the Calvary statement of faith concerning the Trinity
The Trinity
We believe that there is one living and true GOD, eternally existing in three persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, equal in power and glory; that this triune God created all, upholds all, and governs all things (Genesis 1:1; Deuteronomy 6:4; Isaiah 44:8, 48:16; Matthew 28:19-20; John 10:30; Hebrews 1:3).
Actually a type foreshadows an antitype. An antitype is not a type. It is the real thing.The antitype doesn't do anything but point to the reality.
So, baptism is the fulfillment of the type, and also saves.
Fair enough. Appreciate the correction.Actually a type foreshadows an antitype. An antitype is not a type. It is the real thing.
I have not had such a good laugh in a long whileJohn's baptism was a believer's baptism. They believed what John preached and then they were baptized for repentance.
satan told me that he was not going to let my doctrine prevail because he was going to have his people denounce it as heresy.
I have not had such a good laugh in a long while
Yup you ad satan are in control NOT
pastor Chuck and the movement definitely teach the doctrine of with, in, and upon, about the Holy Spirit.
No, they haven't asked me to leave.
Lord bless you.
Of course he cannot do what he threatened. I prayed that my doctrine would have free course and be glorified, even as it is with me.
satan told me that he was not going to let my doctrine prevail because he was going to have his people denounce it as heresy.
After the statement in Acts 10:43, Peter commands the group to be baptized in water in the name of the Lord. (Acts 10:47-48) According to scripture elsewhere it is at that point that their sins were remitted as provided for by the shed blood of Jesus. (Acts 2:38, 22:16...)![]()
Acts 10:43~ All the prophets testify about Him that everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins through His name.
![]()
I didn't say that they teach everything I do.
But I am in agreement with the above statement on the Trinity.
So, baptism is the fulfillment of the type, and also saves.
Sheeees back. lolLove how you twist what people say which of course ties in with your biblical understanding
I DID NOT SAY baptism had not been heard of or instituted. I DID say that baptism in the NT was a new ordination as pertains to believers. In fact, mr let-me-step-all- over- the- truth, you exactly quoted where I said it
It's actually funny. I suspect yr sense of humor may also be lacking
When you and your friends gonna cop to being Oneness Pentecostals?
Yes, that specific doctrine is just like I have presented.Yeah. But not like what you have presented.
Yes, my doctrine.Well make up your mind sunshine cause you actually said that he, the devil, not God but the inferior created being who tried to take His place, told you that he was not going to let YOUR doctrine prevail
Another slap in the face of God the SonYes, my doctrine.
Just like Jesus said His doctrine was His doctrine and Paul said that his doctrine was his doctrine.
Yet both doctrines of both people are entirely biblical.
Jhn 7:16, Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.
2Ti 3:10, But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience,
While I emphasize the Oneness of the Lord in the Trinity, I do not deny the distinction between the members in the Godhead.Well you cannot be in agreement as they do not emphasize oneness
Just makin it up as you go along are you? That is not a question.
It's pretty shameful if you are trying to drag down a man and the churches he founded by saying they believe as do you
Do you try to undermine the teaching in the Calvary church you go to? I would think you do
Wrong.Baptism has saved exactly zero people from their sins.
And you just slapped me in the face...Another slap in the face of God the Son
Actually, I do not.Do you try to undermine the teaching in the Calvary church you go to? I would think you do