Where was Jesus for the three days between his death and resurrection?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
HeIsHere

HeIsHere

Well-known member
#301
May 21, 2022
6,342
2,467
113
#301
Magenta said:
If you have not seen the boasting in this very thread and many others as well I do not know what to say.

You take it personally because you are emotionally invested despite your claim to the contrary.
Click to expand...
I actually have no firm position yet ... except for I know "annihilationism" is not biblical.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#302
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#302
HeIsHere said:
I actually have no firm position yet ... except for I know "annihilationism" is not biblical.
Click to expand...
I am glad we at least agree that annihilation/"annihilationism" is not a Biblical concept .:)
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#303
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#303
HeIsHere said:
I actually have no firm position yet ... except for I know "annihilationism" is not biblical.
Click to expand...
Well, you actually have a fairly firm position but seem rather reluctant to admit it, even as you
do so unwittingly, which makes plain to those with eyes to see that you come out against one
side far more often and with much more ardour than you mildly make any protest against the other.

If you actually were more balanced in how you present your views on this, nobody could fault you.

As it is, you are far from being neutral, and your slant is in a decided direction.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#305
Jan 13, 2016
17,186
3,703
113
#305
Franc254 said:
Nope Paul is actually who called paradise the third heaven
Click to expand...
Yes, I know. This was after the resurrection. The Lord did not ascend until after his resurrection making it impossible for paradise to be in the third heaven at that time.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#306
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#306
John146 said:
Yes, I know. This was after the resurrection. The Lord did not ascend until after his
resurrection making it impossible for paradise to be in the third heaven at that time.
Click to expand...
What makes it impossible is Jesus having said, And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that
came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. Or, in other words much easier to
understand: No one has ascended into heaven except the One who descended from heaven—the Son of Man.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#307
Jan 13, 2016
17,186
3,703
113
#307
Magenta said:
What makes it impossible is Jesus having said, And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that
came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. Or, in other words much easier to
understand: No one has ascended into heaven except the One who descended from heaven—the Son of Man.
Click to expand...
He ascended after his resurrection. Therefore, paradise was not in the third heaven until Jesus took it there after his resurrection.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#308
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#308
John146 said:
He ascended after his resurrection. Therefore, paradise was not in the third heaven until Jesus took it there after his resurrection.
Click to expand...
He also said nobody had ascended to heaven except Him. So paradise was obviously not there.

That is a more sure proof than simply saying it was because He had not yet ascended Himself.
 
HeIsHere

HeIsHere

Well-known member
#309
May 21, 2022
6,342
2,467
113
#309
Magenta said:
Well, you actually have a fairly firm position but seem rather reluctant to admit it, even as you
do so unwittingly, which makes plain to those with eyes to see that you come out against one
side far more often and with much more ardour than you mildly make any protest against the other.

If you actually were more balanced in how you present your views on this, nobody could fault you.

As it is, you are far from being neutral, and your slant is in a decided direction.
Click to expand...
I have studied the position of "annihilation" the most, that is the reason.
So I have more to offer! :LOL:

I managed to leave the Reformed Doctrine threads so I am sure I will be successful again.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#310
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#310
HeIsHere said:
I have studied the position of "annihilation" the most, that is the reason.
So I have more to offer! :LOL:

I managed to leave the Reformed Doctrine threads so I am sure I will be successful again.
Click to expand...
I am of the opinion that people use terms that are not in the Bible when discussing the beliefs of others
in order to slyly misrepresent what others believe. I see it again and again, especially with certain people.

Yes, I suppose you will need a little extra something to make good on your word...
 
HeIsHere

HeIsHere

Well-known member
#311
May 21, 2022
6,342
2,467
113
#311
Magenta said:
I am of the opinion that people use terms that are not in the Bible when discussing the beliefs of others
in order to slyly misrepresent what others believe. I see it again and again, especially with certain people.
Click to expand...
If you do not believe that God "annihilates" I will count that as a good thing and we are at least on the some page in that regard.
But there are only two states of being, exist and non existence as far as I know,

If you want you can clarify.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#312
Jan 13, 2016
17,186
3,703
113
#312
Magenta said:
He also said nobody had ascended to heaven except Him. So paradise was obviously not there.

That is a more sure proof than simply saying it was because He had not yet ascended Himself.
Click to expand...
Jesus said this before his resurrection, yes? And no man could ascend into heaven without the help of our Lord, yes?
 
F

Franc254

Active member
#313
Oct 7, 2022
167
36
28
#313
John146 said:
Scripture states it was Samuel. Is scripture lying?
Click to expand...

It was not Samuel but a demonic spirit.....
John146 said:
Yes, I know. This was after the resurrection. The Lord did not ascend until after his resurrection making it impossible for paradise to be in the third heaven at that time.
Click to expand...

But he was God not limited to anywhere
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#314
Jul 31, 2013
37,989
13,627
113
#314
VARob said:
I believe God is able to raise a person who has died from the dead. The exact same person, not a "clone."
Click to expand...
then that person exists beyond their physical death.
it makes no sense to speak of raising someone who does not exist: the Bible speaks of "resurrection" not recreation or reincarnation.
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#315
Jul 31, 2013
37,989
13,627
113
#315
VARob said:
God expects you to understand what the scriptures are saying.

The devil is extremely good at impersonating dead people. That's why they're called familiar spirits.
Click to expand...
what the scriptures are saying happen to be that it is Samuel.

i believe God has great command of language;
if He meant to write "a demon impersonating Samuel" He would have written that.
if God meant to write "a familiar spirit" He would have.
but He didn't. He wrote, "Samuel"
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#316
Jul 31, 2013
37,989
13,627
113
#316
Franc254 said:
It was not Samuel but a demonic spirit.....
Click to expand...

the Bible says it was Samuel.

the Bible is not written in such a way that we are supposed to believe the exact opposite of what it says.
the Bible is written in such a way that we are supposed to believe what it says.
 
Cameron143

Cameron143

Well-known member
#317
Mar 1, 2022
20,097
6,888
113
62
#317
posthuman said:
what the scriptures are saying happen to be that it is Samuel.

i believe God has great command of language;
if He meant to write "a demon impersonating Samuel" He would have written that.
if God meant to write "a familiar spirit" He would have.
but He didn't. He wrote, "Samuel"
Click to expand...
As a follow up, the witch was used to dealing with demons. She was surprised because it was an actual person.
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#318
Jul 31, 2013
37,989
13,627
113
#318
VARob said:
If a person is honest with the scriptures, all of them, not just taking the parable in Luke 16:19ff as a true story, or Jesus' misunderstood statement to the thief on the cross, but taking into account all the OT scriptures that dalk about death, "cut off," sheol, the pit, etc, he'll have a true understanding of what death is.

Why do you think God forbade necromancy, mediums, and other practices where people think they can seek advice from the dead or talk to their dear departed grandma? The devil is responsible for ALL that stuff. Both God and the devil know how gullible people are.
Click to expand...
why would Jesus present a lying demonic worldview as though it is the accurate one?
 
V

VARob

Banned
#319
Dec 21, 2020
1,825
474
83
#319
posthuman said:
then that person exists beyond their physical death.
Click to expand...
Only in God's memory.

it makes no sense to speak of raising someone who does not exist: the Bible speaks of "resurrection" not recreation or reincarnation.
Click to expand...
Right. God will resurrect those who have died. He's God, you know...
 
V

VARob

Banned
#320
Dec 21, 2020
1,825
474
83
#320
posthuman said:
why would Jesus present a lying demonic worldview as though it is the accurate one?
Click to expand...
Are you referring to the parable in Luke 16:19ff? It's what the Pharisees believed. They had adopted the Greek belief in the immortal soul. Jesus met them where they were, so-to-speak. He got their attention. The point of the parable is verse 31.

Luke 16:31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.