We shall soon see...
I wonder what they'll write in their posts when that time comes to pass..
Says the person who complains that TDW's posts makes his little head hurt.....![]()
You still don't get it, lol! Whoosh!
We shall soon see...
Says the person who complains that TDW's posts makes his little head hurt.....![]()
2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that The Day Of Christ is at hand.
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for That Day shall not come, except there come a falling [THE Departure] away [from earth] first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition..."
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓ ↑ ↓
Sound about right? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DOTL starts here? Or:
Just to clarify: The Day Of The LORD Begins at "THE revelation of The Wicked one, or in the Second Half on Daniel's Seventieth Week?
I see too much lining up with what the LORD has showed and told me over the years.Don't let that hold you back from intensive long-term studies of what he is saying.
I have learned more from him and more in depth (like deeeeeep down there) and more quickly than in decades and decades of my earlier pilgrimage. And I was always a prophecy nut who was always pretrib premillennial.
Now having the benefit of the diligent study of his work, to say that I am firmly entrenched as a pretrib premillennial is the understatement of the century.
BTW......an ancillary benefit is that you will be able to uttely quash the pretensions of the a-mills, post-mills, preterists and historicists. All of whom are absolutely dead wrong.
I am a post-tribber. But, I am not prepared to lay out the case, at least not at this time. There's only so much time in the day.I do a lot of pondering about end times and what it’ll look like for the believer. No one in my church wants to talk about it, so I thought I’d bring it here.
I have heard a few theologians proclaim that a pre-trib rapture is false doctrine, and a “lie from the pit of hell”.
I’m a pre-tribber married to a post tribber, and frankly, his arguments for a post tribulational rapture don’t hold water as far as I’m concerned. Perhaps a post-tribber from this forum can make me understand.
I have an open mind. Mostly because I fully expected the rapture to happen last year. The numbers just made sense. 2021 was 73 years since Israel became a nation, leaving 7 years for the tribulation culminating in the 80-year-old-generation mentioned in Psalms.
Regardless, God is angry, and He’s about to punish the entire planet, and I’m persuaded that ours is the generation that will see these things come to pass. With a possible (probable?) WWIII scenario, and end time prophecies jumping off the pages of the Bible, I am fascinated, excited, and a little nervous. I would love to read the thoughts of any post-tribbers on what you think it will look like for believers to go through the tribulation (specifically, the 7 trumpets, seals and bowls of The Revelation.)
Do post-tribbers believe that as God’s elect, we are subject to the same wrath as everyone else? For instance, at some point the earth will be bombarded with 75 lb hailstones (Rev 16:21). Are we subject to God’s wrath in that we will be crushed along with everyone else? Or will they not effect us? When those crazy looking locusts are tormenting the population, are we to be supernaturally protected from them?
If you’re a post-tribber (or even a non-tribber) convince me that I’m wrong. I wouldn’t want to believe God for something that’s never going to happen based on misinterpreted scripture.
Anybody?
Good post.I do not believe in rapture as most folks here do. I do believe our Lord will return. Your sentence about the numbers make me smile. I was only 2 in 1948 but i well remember about 7 years later hearing my parents ( dad a pentecostal pastor ) talk of rapture any time . then again 40 years about 1988 the talk was rapture because of the generation thing. When that did not happen then generation became 80 years.
Somewhere along the line of life i started doubting what i had been taught. Not doubting the Word of God but how some folks explained it. I believe the Olivet Discourse was God prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem about 70 ad. In reading Scripture seems God always warned the Israelites of what was coming.
It is indeed a fabrication that is not biblical in the slightest.I have heard a few theologians proclaim that a pre-trib rapture is false doctrine, and a “lie from the pit of hell”.
Perhaps; however, you must be willing to consider that what you have been taught is in error - and, be willing to "push it aside" / "put it on hold" / etc. while you very carefully consider what the Bible really actually does-and-does-not say.Perhaps a post-tribber from this forum can make me understand.
You must be willing to "step back" and see eschatology from God's perspective. The idea that all of eschatological prophecy occurs in a short span of time (i.e. - 7 years) - past or future - is not biblical. Revelation prophecy - and that of the Olivet Discourse - is spread out over a span of ~2000 years. It is not a short period of time. Some of it has already come to pass; other parts of it are yet future.I have an open mind. Mostly because I fully expected the rapture to happen last year. The numbers just made sense. 2021 was 73 years since Israel became a nation, leaving 7 years for the tribulation culminating in the 80-year-old-generation mentioned in Psalms.
The first thing you must do (with regard to what you said here) is learn to define things in the Bible strictly based on what the Bible says and not listen to the definitions of men that are based on what they want the Bible to say instead of what it actually says.Regardless, God is angry, and He’s about to punish the entire planet, and I’m persuaded that ours is the generation that will see these things come to pass. With a possible (probable?) WWIII scenario, and end time prophecies jumping off the pages of the Bible, I am fascinated, excited, and a little nervous. I would love to read the thoughts of any post-tribbers on what you think it will look like for believers to go through the tribulation (specifically, the 7 trumpets, seals and bowls of The Revelation.)
Do post-tribbers believe that as God’s elect, we are subject to the same wrath as everyone else? For instance, at some point the earth will be bombarded with 75 lb hailstones (Rev 16:21). Are we subject to God’s wrath in that we will be crushed along with everyone else? Or will they not effect us? When those crazy looking locusts are tormenting the population, are we to be supernaturally protected from them?
Wikipedia has interesting information. Everyone agrees that Darby is largely responsible for popularizing pre trib. I've heard a few different stories on where he got it from. I can not contest Wikipedia's info, but [...]
Hello. I took a look at the Greek and the textural variants, as well as the English translations and I am not sure what your point is. Who is misquoting the scripture here? I agree that the apostasy must come first, then the man of lawlessness will be revealed. I thought everyone knew this. So exactly what point are you making?
@TheDivineWatermark do you believe that the rapture will occur at the beginning of a schmeta? (unsure of it's spelling)
Liddell and Scott Greek-English Lexicon (1845 [1846??]) -
Pages 190 - 191 (pg 191 [right-hand side] middle column)
... for apostasia - "later form for apostasis";
... and for apostasis - "a standing away from, and so-- [...] 2. departure or removal from"
-- https://archive.org/details/greekenglishlexi00lidduoft/page/190/mode/2up
I would have serious concern that a Jesuit priest espoused those views, and so come lately.I agree that places like Wiki (any website really) can "change their info" whenever and for whatever reason... but also, Wiki doesn't always necessarily have "all the information" on any given Subject, either. = )
Consider the following, which (for example) provides a certain piece of info that pertains to a time-frame of about a hundred years BEFORE Darby [not that this matters in the overall scheme of things, mind you...]:
[quoting from old post]
https://www.pre-trib.org/articles/r...llowing-titles-millennium-last-novelties/read
"Two Academical Exercises on Subjects Bearing the following Titles; Millennium, Last-Novelties" - Morgan Edwards (1700s)
Morgan Edwards first published these in 1744, and then published it again in 1788...
...the below quoted texts are excerpted from pages 7, 21, 24, 25 (note: the site says the spelling of Edwards has been modernized)... not exactly how we describe "pre-trib" today, but certainly he is *distinguishing* the point-in-time of "our episynagoges unto Him," and His Second Coming to the earth/the MANIFESTATION of His presence-parousia/OPENLY MANIFEST (as we "pre-tribbers" also see *distinguished* in Scripture):
[quoting Morgan Edwards from link]
[pg 7]
"II. The distance between the first and second resurrection will be somewhat more than a thousand years.
"I say, somewhat more; because the dead saints will be raised, and the living changed at Christ's "appearing in the air" (1 Thes. iv, 17); and this will be about three years and a half before the millennium, as we shall see hereafter: but will he and they abide in the air all that time? No: they will ascend to paradise, or to some one of those many "mansions in the father's house of God" (John xiv: 2), and to disappear during the foresaid period of time. The design of this retreat and disappearing will be to judge the risen and changed saints; for "now the time is come that judgment must begin," and that will be at the house of God" (1 Pet. iv. 17). . ."
[pg 21]
"5. Another event previous to the Millennium will be the appearing of the son of man in the clouds, coming to raise the dead saints and change the living, and to catch them up to himself, and then withdrawing with them, and observed before, This event will come to pass when Antichrist be arrived at Jerusalem in his conquest of the world; and about three years and a half before his killing the witnesses, and assumption of godhead. . . . "
[pg 24]
"8.The last event, and the event that will usher in the millennium, will be, the coming of Christ from paradise to earth, with all the saints he had taken up thither (about three years and a half before. . . ."
[pg 25]
"Millions and millions of saints will have been on earth from the days of the first Adam, to the coming of the second Adam. All these will Christ bring with him. The place where they will alight is the "mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east." Zech. Xiv, 4."
[end quoting from article at link; underline mine]
[end of old post]
____________
Something to think about... when one hears/reads those who suggest that Darby was the first to DISTINGUISH between the time-slot of "our Rapture [IN THE AIR]" and the time-slot of His Second Coming to the earth (when at that point WE will, as it states in Col3:4, "appear WITH [G4862 - UNIONed-with] HIM in glory" !)
You are right, Paul had been talking about a confusion, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our going to meet Him in the clouds ....In your wording here ^ , you've completely skipped over / by-passed verse 2, which is Paul telling about "the false claim" he doesn't want the Thessalonians to be "shaken in mind" and "troubled" by as though it were true;
and that "false claim" is: [anyone] "[purporting] that the Day of the Lord IS PRESENT / IS ALREADY HERE [PERFECT indicative]". (It wasn't, and Paul explains WHY it cannot be so.)
That's the Subject v.3a starts out with, where it says "that day" (i.e. v.2's false claim's Subject, NOT v.1's Subject PAUL is bringing TO CORRECT the "false claim" of v.2).
Many people, when viewing the word "that day" (v.3a), reach back OVER AND PAST Verse 2's FALSE CLAIM ("that the day of the Lord is present"), ignoring that, to grab VERSE 1's Subject (about Jesus, and "our episynagoes unto Him," etc)... as you've done here by leaving verse 2 out entirely from your "example sentence" (i.e. "it would say THIS, which makes NO SENSE")...
Of course what you've put makes no sense[!]... but what you've put also (hate to say it) butchers the text, and is not at all reflective of the actual wording supplied in the text. You're leaving OUT a very vital piece of the text (verse 2!), as you have it written, above.
[another major assumption (tho incorrect) is that "the day of the Lord" (v.2--the Subject of the "false claim") here MEANS "Christ's Second Coming"... but Paul's words in 1Thess5:1-3 PROVE that "the day of the Lord" its ARRIVAL commences WELL-PRIOR to that point (tho it also goes on to INCLUDE the entire MK age, but the "false claim" of 2Th2:2 is speaking of the earliest parts of it [the parts consisting of JUDGMENTs unfolding upon the earth over SOME TIME], not the latter parts of it [the "BLESSINGs"/MK part]...)]
Mighty fine scholarship TDW. We are in your debt once again.... and just a quick point to add to the above ^ ...
See also Georg Benedikt Winer (1789-1858), on Page 24 [under "(d)" toward bottom of page] and continued on Page 25 [7th line, where "apostasia (apostasis...)" are listed also, under this point):
-- A Treatise on the Grammar of New Testament Greek: Regarded as a Sure Basis ... - Georg Benedikt Winer - Google Books
Is @TheDivineWatermark quoting Darby? Nope. He is quoting the Bible and sources not at all related to Darby.You are right, Paul had been talking about a confusion, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our going to meet Him in the clouds ....
The Rapture
That day will not come.
Nelson Darby talked alot of rubbish about this, he claimed that whenever "that day" was mentioned it must always mean the day of judgement.
... but it is not so, you can check it out for yourself.
Darby deliberately changed words and meanings to teach the lie of pretribulation rapture.
The day of Christ is not the day of the Lord which comes after the 1, 000 yearsYou are scrambling those verses incoherently.
Here is what is said:
Geneva Bible of 1599
(1) Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our assembling unto him,
(2) That ye be not suddenly moved from your mind, nor troubled neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter, as it were from us, as though the day of Christ were at hand.
(3) Let no man deceive you by any means, for that day shall not come, except there come a departing first, and that the man of sin be disclosed, even the son of perdition,
BTW, although it is not explicitly stated in the text, one may confidently deduce that the Thessalonians were duped by a false letter, and because of this, they thought that the DOTL was upon them.......AND THAT THEY MISSED THE RAPTURE.
2Th 2:2
not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come.