It should also be noted that nowhere in Scripture -- whether on earth or in Heaven -- do angels speak in another language (which could be labeled as "the tongues of angels").
You should look at I Corinthians 13:1 where Paul says if I speak in the tongues of men and of angels.
The idea of tongues of angels also shows up in intertestamental literature-- the Testiment of Job, or something like that. There might be another reference.
But the idea is in the Bible.
Whenever they spoke it was in a human language, and even when Paul was in the third heaven (in Paradise) he heard things which he could understand, but was forbidden to disclose them. So Paul was being hyperbolic to make a point.
This passage about 'a man' caught up into the third heaven does not mention speaking in tongues.
What we should always keep in mind is that he viewed prophecy as far more beneficial than tongues. He also ranks the spiritual gifts in the order of their importance.
Paul says that greater is he who prophesies than he who speaks in tongues, unless he interpret.
Not everyone has every gift. Do you prophesy? Some people prophesy, some teach, and many people have other gifts. Tongues and interpretation edifies the body, and the Bible teaches the church to allow it.