None of these people have any knowledge of the school or anything going on. I watched the video and they refused to cite where they got this information.
Who is the 'they' that supposedly refused to cite where the info came from? The video is plainly marked as to who posted it and the video contains posts from the man in the yellow sweater who plainly states he is a homosexual. So, 'these people', concerned believers in Christ, are not hiding anything and making statements to indicate otherwise, is not exactly honest unless you missed all that information.
The video is posted by an individual with a youtube channel and has over 55,000 followers. His name is Caleb Corneloup. He is also the author of a book entitled 'I Think Biblically'. Be assured you can find many people who think the same of his reporting as it seems do you and several others. I am actually not familiar with him so I cannot say I agree with all he says or writes or does. However, he does certainly seem to be spot on with regards to the claims of homosexuals and other sexual deviants being in the spotlight in Asbury.
It is not difficult to just say 'poo' when you disagree, but research on the topic would substantiate the claims of the video.
At the 2:22 minute mark he refers to the man in the yellow sweater. Frankly, I would absolutely see this particular individual as a 'gay' man myself after seeing him. Being in the field I am in, I have had an abundance of interactions with homosexuals. You can't miss them.
You are free to call that an opinion or prejudice or whatever you want, but since that man refers to himself as homosexual, that seems to clinch the 'assumption' . He also refers to others of his persuasion at the university. This same person offers proof of what is being said in his twitter feed and is proud of his identification. His name is Edward Versaii; at least that is what he calls himself. His twitter handle is Elijah'. See minute 4:45
At 5:25 he says that he and his gay friends are leading worship and have been for 8 days.
Ignore it if that is your preference but for those who wish to acknowledge what is true, there certainly is ample proof of what is going on with regards to the 'worship'. The Bible is explicit with regards to homosexuals. Unrepentant homosexuals are not welcome in heaven and whatever spirit they are channeling is not the Holy Spirit.
Now I understand how difficult it can be to grasp this; God knows I have been through it myself and it was painful to see what was really going on. There are genuine occurrences in this gathering, but when you have unclean spirits parading on the platform, you will have a history of unexplained negative impacts on some people that will follow.
You may note I have not put down the entire event, because I know there will be the genuine but it is the false that I am trying to show here.
Everyone can make their own choice but you might stop trying to say there is no proof of the negative side of this so called 'revival'.
You may say people do not have knowledge of the school, but anything you wish to know can be found online. Social media has referenced this as a great outpouring; a worldwide phenomena . But, would you be somewhat concerned to know that such 'outpourings' have occurred over and over and over for over 50 years now with each one consisting of worship and singing, arms upraised and so on, but actual repentance only on the part of a few? Search scripture and you will find that this is not an actual revival.
I understand that research is work, but God commends those who do that work and do not believe everything they see and hear because not all is of God and lying spirits are in every church, every meeting and only too eager to find ears that will not questions but simply believe feelings because it feels good.
Unless you have actual questions about what I posted, rather than stating there is no proof as if that comment in itself is somehow the gold standard in truth, (even though proof is offered in more than one place)I am not going to continue posting with you further. I don't seek to argue and it seems that arguing is a ongoing issue in this forum of which I do not care to partake. I am not accusing you of arguing, but it is what seems to be an accepted form of dialogue here.
Thanks