Agreed. You cannot be acting in free will if you are under obligation and risk of penalty.I think that’s why it’s called “freewill”![]()
Agreed. You cannot be acting in free will if you are under obligation and risk of penalty.I think that’s why it’s called “freewill”![]()
No such thing in the House of Godobligation and risk of penalty.
Bible-based doctrine
But they keep teaching Shakespeare.You know..... we haven't had a good knock-down drag out about "King James only" lately....
I'm surprised. I'm sorry.... I meant... it surpriseth me.. verily. Forsooth. It vexeth me, sorely.
Cain was cheerful, until God didn't accept his offering, because it came not alongside what God requested.It's my understanding that one can give whatever one desires, because God loves a cheerful giver: "But this I say, He which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully. Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver" (Co 9:6, 7).
They no longer do that in BDF? For shame! That's like christianchat's version of WWE's Royal Rumble.You know..... we haven't had a good knock-down drag out about "King James only" lately....
I'm surprised. I'm sorry.... I meant... it surpriseth me.. verily. Forsooth. It vexeth me, sorely.
None of which has anything to do with 'tithing'.Cain was cheerful, until God didn't accept his offering, because it came not alongside what God requested.
Gen 4:3 And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD.Gen 4:4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:Gen 4:5 But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
You know..... we haven't had a good knock-down drag out about "King James only" lately....
I'm surprised. I'm sorry.... I meant... it surpriseth me.. verily. Forsooth. It vexeth me, sorely.
Yes, as they should. Because of his stories, not because of the language in which they were written.But they keep teaching Shakespeare.
Go figure.
Forsooth, such must not be! We must assumeth one doth care, else would there be no song about such an incident. Marry, it seemeth outright foolishness to inscribe songs about which one careth not.Jimmy cracketh corn and I doth not carest..
Alas, tis truth what thou speaketh. I shall say more lest I no more see thee anon. I care exceedingly more than I leadth on and, I daresay, evenmoreso than I shouldst desireth to ever care.Forsooth, such must not be! We must assumeth one doth care, else would there be no song about such an incident. Marry, it seemeth outright foolishness to inscribe songs about which one careth not.
SoYes, as they should. Because of his stories, not because of the language in which they were written.
I had an English teacher in the 8th or 9th grade that made us memorize the prologue to the Canterbury Tales in old English....
It was a valuable exercise, in that it showed us how language has evolved..... but in my lifetime since then, I have never had the occasion to read anything in old English, much less study something...
"what light through yonder window breaks?' Students STILL are asking "what does that mean?"
enough of that, however. Back to your original program.... another expired equine that requires a good thrashing with mis-applied scriptures (in ancient English, of course)![]()
????? What do you mean by that?So
“Our Father and Mother in heaven”
Is easier to understand?
????? What do you mean by that?
Is this the scripture you are referencing? Where did the "Mother" part come from?
“Pray, then, in this way:
‘Our Father, who is in heaven,
Hallowed be Your name.
10 Your kingdom come.
Your will be done,
On earth as it is in heaven.
11 Give us this day our daily bread.
12 And forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.
13 And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from evil...."
Balderdash. You're a spiritual bully. You like to prove you are right and other people are wrong.
You also like ripping scripture out of context a lot. You seem to get some delight from it somehow.
You're a would-be preacher, but for all the wrong reasons. You like the idea of being a preacher because you think it means berating people from on high.
If you really want to make a difference, find out how to tell people they are wrong without telling them they are idiots. Figure out how to tell them they are wrong and at the same time make them feel good about doing right.
He doesn't require us to throw ourselves into the fire, He loves us and wants the best for us.To the last two statements, I agree completely. To the first two, in principle, you are correct, but in practice, you are not.
Do you give 100% of your income to Christian ministries, and you live on nothing at all? I doubt it. Regardless, the question on the table is whether Christians are required to surrender (and I don't mean "give") a tithe to their local church.
There are many aspects to this topic, which I won't try to enunciate here, but I will note that most people with whom I have discussed this come at it from the erroneous assumption that "tithing" is just another word for "giving".