Doctrine of Unconditional Election
- Thread starter brightfame52
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
The Bible says that it's impossible for God to lie concerning the hope (Heb 6:18). I believe God has not, does not, and will not lie, but could He lie? That's almost more of a philosophical question than a theological one. We know that He has been sorry a time or two, and has changed His mind (Gen 6:6; Isa 38:1-5).
Honestly, while I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not lie and confident that He will not lie, I would be uncomfortable in saying there was something God could not do. He is God.
Honestly, while I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that God does not lie and confident that He will not lie, I would be uncomfortable in saying there was something God could not do. He is God.
[2Co 4:4 KJV] 4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
Sequence is clear if you are unbiased.
Their minds were blinded as a result of their choice not to believe.
This is in fact exactly what he is stating.
Sequence is clear if you are unbiased.
Their minds were blinded as a result of their choice not to believe.
This is in fact exactly what he is stating.
Nope.
Besides your interpretation being logically impossible, for it to mean what you've said, it would have had to be written as:
" them who believe not, the god of this world blinds their minds", and not how it was actually written.
Also, you ignore:
[Act 13:48 KJV] 48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.
[1Pe 1:21 KJV] 21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.
Besides your interpretation being logically impossible, for it to mean what you've said, it would have had to be written as:
" them who believe not, the god of this world blinds their minds", and not how it was actually written.
Also, you ignore:
[Act 13:48 KJV] 48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.
[1Pe 1:21 KJV] 21 Who by him do believe in God, that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; that your faith and hope might be in God.
Are you basing that on Heb 6:18?
Heb 6:18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
It says that in two immutable things it was impossible for God to lie.
I am not saying that God did, does, or will lie, ever, but could He? He is God...
What are you inferring by that? Are you suggesting that because we have a sin nature that we cannot believe the gospel unless God somehow first intervenes?
If that is what you are suggesting, I do not agree.
Heb 6:18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
It says that in two immutable things it was impossible for God to lie.
I am not saying that God did, does, or will lie, ever, but could He? He is God...
What are you inferring by that? Are you suggesting that because we have a sin nature that we cannot believe the gospel unless God somehow first intervenes?
If that is what you are suggesting, I do not agree.
-
1
- Show all
No.
Were that the intention of the verse, for it to be correct logically, it couldn't have been written that way.
As I posted to John146, for it to mean what you say, it would have had to be written as:
"them who believe not, the god of this world blinds their minds", and not how it was actually written.
Were that the intention of the verse, for it to be correct logically, it couldn't have been written that way.
As I posted to John146, for it to mean what you say, it would have had to be written as:
"them who believe not, the god of this world blinds their minds", and not how it was actually written.
False Grace is given and by that its received. Rom 12:6
Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith;
1Cor 1:4
I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;
Eph 4:7
But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ
2 Tim 1:9
Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,
Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith;
1Cor 1:4
I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;
Eph 4:7
But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ
2 Tim 1:9
Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,
-
1
- Show all
Who defined God's grace that way? 
to have grace, it needs to be received by the person, meaning I think, that the recipient has to do something
in order to get it - which I emphatically disagree with.