.
• John 6:52 . .The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this
man give us [his] flesh to eat?”
• John 6:62 . . Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this,
he said to them, “Does this shock you? What if you were to see the Son of
Man ascending to where he was before?
Here's thing. The Jews could cannibalize Jesus' body while he was physically
present; but supposing they lost access to his body; then what?
The process of transubstantiation was invented as a contingency to address
this difficulty, but no matter how we cut a pumpkin pie, it's still a pumpkin
pie, i.e. cannibalism is cannibalism no matter the method one goes about it.
A very important difficulty associated with transubstantiation is the body that
folks are supposed to eat is Jesus' crucified body (Luke 22:19 & 1Cor 11:24)
Well; the flesh and blood of that body no longer exist, having undergone a
transformation sometime after Jesus' resurrection.
We must also ask: Is the flesh of his body that folks are supposed to eat
living flesh or dead? The reason I ask is because Gen 9:4 says:
"Only meat with its lifeblood still in it you shall not eat."
So the flesh from Jesus' body that folks are supposed to eat has to be quite
dead beyond any chance of recovery. This again is problematic because
Jesus' transformed body is immortal, i.e. it cannot die. (Rom 6:9 & Rev 1:18)
_