Christians response to gay marriage?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

Scarecrow

Banned
#361
Nov 2, 2022
248
9
18
#361
HeIsHere said:
Where is that in the constitution?
Click to expand...
if you were to read Loving V. Virginia you would know that such rights are protected by the establishment clause and the equal protection clause.

"State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#362
#362
Dude653 said:
Abortion terminates life. Two same-sex couples getting married doesn't. If you don't see the difference I can't help you.
One thing I can say with 100% certainty is that a same-sex couple will never have an abortion
Click to expand...

Not my point. My point was the "live and let live" attitude. Doesn't work that way with God.
 
SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#363
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#363
Scarecrow said:
Do you think that the only reason opposite gender couples get married is the "special privileges" afforded to married couples?
Click to expand...
No: a lot of married people don't even know why they got married, and many regret it afterward. But really, if you don't want the GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INCENTIVES of civil-marriage, there is no reason to go to the government to get married at all. They don't need to be involved.

And yes, that is exactly what they are- privileges. Financial incentives.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#364
#364
Dude653 said:
Marriage isn't mentioned at all in the Constitution but I bet you would be singing a different tune if they tried to say you can't get married at all.
I would say it falls under the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Also supreme Court decides what is or isn't constitutional
Click to expand...
Tell that to the abortion crowd...
 
S

Scarecrow

Banned
#365
Nov 2, 2022
248
9
18
#365
SomeDisciple said:
No: a lot of married people don't even know why they got married, and many regret it afterward. But really, if you don't want the GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INCENTIVES of civil-marriage, there is no reason to go to the government to get married at all. They don't need to be involved.

And yes, that is exactly what they are- privileges. Financial incentives.
Click to expand...
then why do you insist that same sex couples want to get married just for the societal benefits?
 
SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#366
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#366
Scarecrow said:
Do you think that the only reason opposite gender couples get married is the "special privileges" afforded to married couples?
Click to expand...
And in the context of what I actually wrote: if people who were married in a traditional marriage were not already married through the state and receiving the benefits from that- then no, gay people would probably never have pursued marriage through the state.
 
S

Scarecrow

Banned
#368
Nov 2, 2022
248
9
18
#368
SomeDisciple said:
And in the context of what I actually wrote: if people who were married in a traditional marriage were not already married through the state and receiving the benefits from that- then no, gay people would probably never have pursued marriage through the state.
Click to expand...
any reason for thinking this outside of personal prejudice?
 
SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#370
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#370
And the "benefits" I am talking about are absolutely "personal benefits". SOCIETY benefits by people being married in accordance with the BIBLE. PEOPLE receive PERSONAL BENEFITS (MONEY, insurance advantages, et al.) through government policies, that doesn't benefit society, that benefits the people getting "married".
 
SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#371
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#371
Scarecrow said:
any reason for thinking this outside of personal prejudice?
Click to expand...
Personal prejudice? You're delusional.

Like I said, if you cared about gay people so much, you'd care about single gay people too, but you obviously don't, because if you did you'd understand what I'm saying.
 
The_Watchers_2017

The_Watchers_2017

Banned
#372
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
#372
From Jesus Himself defining what marriage means.

After reading my attachment since I am on my mobile and cannot copy/paste, explain to me how is it possible for same sex people to become ONE FLESH which is God's distinction of marriage?

ALSO NOTICE GOD CREATED THEM MALE AND FEMALE TO BE MARRIED, NOT SAME SEX.
 

Attachments

SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#373
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#373
Gay marriage advocates don't actually care one bit for gay PEOPLE.

Because if you really cared about gay-people you wouldn't make them get married to give them a tax advantage, and you would just let them cover whoever they needed to cover with their insurance instead of making them get married to get someone covered. The gay-marriage agenda is not even a pro-gay agenda, it's an ANTI-CHRIST agenda. They are USING gay people to advance an agenda that is contrary to the bible and THAT'S IT. They just want people to think the bible is wrong.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#374
Mar 19, 2011
13,030
1,155
113
#374
SomeDisciple said:
Gay marriage advocates don't actually care one bit for gay PEOPLE.

Because if you really cared about gay-people you wouldn't make them get married to give them a tax advantage, and you would just let them cover whoever they needed to cover with their insurance instead of making them get married to get someone covered. The gay-marriage agenda is not even a pro-gay agenda, it's an ANTI-CHRIST agenda. They are USING gay people to advance an agenda that is contrary to the bible and THAT'S IT. They just want people to think the bible is wrong.
Click to expand...
When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression
So you think someone else gaining something takes something away
 
HeIsHere

HeIsHere

Well-known member
#375
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
#375
Dude653 said:
Disagree. Secular law protects everyone's rights because one religion doesn't get special treatment over another
Click to expand...
No such thing as "secular law" when it comes to the topic at hand.

The rule of law is not like the rules of grammar.

Law can never been blind to moral distinctions nor can it avoid making moral judgments.
 
SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#376
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#376
SomeDisciple

SomeDisciple

Well-known member
#378
Jul 4, 2021
2,384
1,085
113
#378
I bet a lot of these gay-marriage advocates don't even engage with real gay people. It's all about denying Jesus, and that's it.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#379
Mar 19, 2011
13,030
1,155
113
#379
SomeDisciple said:
I bet a lot of these gay-marriage advocates don't even engage with real gay people. It's all about denying Jesus, and that's it.
Click to expand...
Which they have a constitutional right to do.
 
HeIsHere

HeIsHere

Well-known member
#380
May 21, 2022
6,339
2,465
113
#380
Scarecrow said:
if you were to read Loving V. Virginia you would know that such rights are protected by the establishment clause and the equal protection clause.

"State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Click to expand...
This is the ruling in question and it was not unanimous btw.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.