They’re experts because they’ve studied in depth whatever it is they’ve studied. They went to school, poured hundreds if not thousands of hours into it. Listened to all sides of their subject matter and passed tests, wrote papers/books about their subject.
What makes you an expert? Listening to all sides and using science is part of being an expert. Being willing to sculpt your opinion is part of being an expert.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
Again, why do you know better than an expert? In fact, what makes you a better expert than them?
Once again I also went to a top university, studied science, got a graduate degree and feel that I too can read the studies.
I read a very comprehensive study from one of the agents brought in to investigate 9/11, one of the experts that you are referring to and he was very upset at the studies that were not done and the very poor investigation that was done.
For example, in the trunk of all of the bomb experts was a simple machine that would sample the air for bombs since they will leave a signature in the air. He was not allowed to do the study. He was outraged that they were not allowed to check the steel which would confirm or debunk the various theories. The steel was guarded by the US military and he wasn't allowed to look at it even though he was part of the investigating team. The US has built a state of the art building that can simulate any 3 story fire. This would have been perfect to simulate the fire that took place and determine if the official story was valid or not. They didn't do this test.
But not only so there are over 100 "experts" as you refer to them, who are engineers or architects who questioned the official narrative. They could not believe that the fire caused the collapse of the two buildings hit by the airplanes, much less the third building that wasn't hit.
Because of this people like the man I referred to who were brought in to do the investigation gathered samples of the dust where they found the tell tale spherical steel balls that you get when Thermite melts steel. These balls confirmed the temperature of the fire was close to or greater than 4,000 degrees F, and there is no chance at all that a fire from jet fuel and office supplies would get anywhere near that temperature.
But in addition to that the building continued to burn for 99 day at temperatures around 3500 degrees F. The jet fuel probably burned up in 15 minutes, this is completely unexplained and ignored by the official accounts.
These "experts" that you have called them wrote several extensive books detailing the failings in the 911 report and the evidence that they found which is completely unexplained. They set up a web site detailing all this and they had over 100 engineers and architects sign a letter questioning the official report. I was teaching forensics and chose the 911 case study as a great example of engineering forensics. I expected to see the best and most extensive study done, instead it was a shambles and an embarrassment. That is when I discovered all these other "experts" who were questioning the report.
But hey, you think some guy with box cutters brought those towers down. I lived in NYC, the Towers were a city unto themselves. But believe what you want to believe. Trust the experts. If they tell you to wear a mask, wear it proud. If they tell you to get a shot, get it to save humanity. If they promise you that this is a one time deal and there won't be any more shots, you can take that to the bank. You are an adult, make your own decisions and if that is to mindlessly do what you are told you have that right.
I have a very close friend who has a top level position in the Federal government. I asked him about this and he referred me to an MIT study "which explained it". Obviously he was too busy to get into the details, but I read the study and the study was eye opening. The writers clearly said that the theory that the planes brought down the buildings was extremely implausible, but if that is what happened then here is the math that explains it. That was a joke. But MIT gets funding from the US government and when they were asked to "explain it" they did. They also said there were a number of tests the US government could run to confirm this is indeed what happened, the same tests the other investigator wanted to run but wasn't allowed to.