Unhinged Cop Verbally Abuses Woman

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
R

Runningman

Banned
#121
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#121
EndQualifiedImmunity said:
You didn't answer my question whatsoever. I diligently strive to answer every question you've asked me. If I have not, please re-ask and I'll do so. I just ask you give me the same respect and answer questions so we can have a smooth fruitful flow of conversation.

Please respond to the follwing:

Having said that, we DO have audio recording where the woman asks to speak to the officer, and the officer agreeing. True or false?

After the officer agrees to a conversation, the woman begins to speak and he interrupts her and threatens to put her in handcuffs if she doesn't shut up. True or false?

While the cop gives her a directive to sit down, he never threatens to put her in cuffs for not sitting down. The only time he threatens to put her in cuffs is if she doesn't shut her mouth. True or false?

Freedom of speech means we are free from consequences and retaliation from the state when we are engaged in protected free speech. True or false?

A person has their 1st amendment right to freedom of speech (provided it's protected free speech) in addition to their 5th amendment right to remain silent, when being arrested (Miranda rights) or while detained for probable cause. True or false.
Click to expand...
I've already said what I believe about this video. I don't see how answering these questions is important at this point. You're free to believe whatever you want. I am going to go out on a limb and speculate we're going to disagree. For example, you think telling someone to not talk is a violation of their rights and that police officers who make mistakes are just as guilty as criminals who unknowingly break the law. It's difficult to hold a rational conversation under that pretense.

I guess you're probably an anti-cop activist hence the username EndQualifiedImmunity.
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#122
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#122
Polar said:
that's called verbal intimidation and it can only escalate from there

people use intimidation in order to dominate others. we have all probably experienced that type of behavior and we respond differently to it; we are not all the same. Some capitulate and others fight back. In the case of family members being treated as the cop treated the woman, it can create fear or great resentment. Apparently in this case, the woman expressed fear and anger

It's never a good thing though and people respond better to reason in most cases
Click to expand...
It looks like she went into the police station with the intention to provoke the officer. Many anti-cop activists do that nowadays. She took the recording and knew exactly where to put it on the Internet. She even gave an interview about what she alleges happened. Notice that despite how dramatized the video is, there isn't actually any proof of anything.
 
D

Dirtman

Well-known member
#123
Jul 19, 2022
1,151
441
83
#123
Runningman said:
It looks like she went into the police station with the intention to provoke the officer. Many anti-cop activists do that nowadays. She took the recording and knew exactly where to put it on the Internet. She even gave an interview about what she alleges happened. Notice that despite how dramatized the video is, there isn't actually any proof of anything.
Click to expand...
Her language was not provocative at all. She went to pick up an undeserved citation and got verbally abused by an unhinged thug with a badge.
 
D

Dirtman

Well-known member
#124
Jul 19, 2022
1,151
441
83
#124
Runningman said:
I've already said what I believe about this video. I don't see how answering these questions is important at this point. You're free to believe whatever you want. I am going to go out on a limb and speculate we're going to disagree. For example, you think telling someone to not talk is a violation of their rights and that police officers who make mistakes are just as guilty as criminals who unknowingly break the law. It's difficult to hold a rational conversation under that pretense.

I guess you're probably an anti-cop activist hence the username EndQualifiedImmunity.
Click to expand...
The verbal abuse and treatment of that woman was not a mistake. He is an abuser.
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#125
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#125
Dirtman said:
Her language was not provocative at all. She went to pick up an undeserved citation and got verbally abused by an unhinged thug with a badge.
Click to expand...
She was told to sit down. The only time a cop would shout at someone to sit down is if they are way out of line. Sorry, I am with the cop here. She's clearly out to get someone and she has a motive too. Her business had a sting operation launched on it. That much is sure.
 
D

Dirtman

Well-known member
#126
Jul 19, 2022
1,151
441
83
#126
Sadly there are those who think that the pigs' dogs keep the peace rather than do the pigs' dirty work .
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#127
Mar 19, 2011
12,662
1,098
113
#127
Yeah. Granted she could have just taken the citation and left quietly but the officer escalated the situation from about zero to a million in about 2 seconds. No way someone with an explosive temper like this should be trusted with a gun
 
D

Dirtman

Well-known member
#128
Jul 19, 2022
1,151
441
83
#128
Dude653 said:
Yeah. Granted she could have just taken the citation and left quietly but the officer escalated the situation from about zero to a million in about 2 seconds. No way someone with an explosive temper like this should be trusted with a gun
Click to expand...
Or the public trust.
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#129
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#129
Nowadays you just gotta yell at someone and have the incident misrepresented on YouTube to be crucified. Amazing.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#130
Mar 19, 2011
12,662
1,098
113
#130
Runningman said:
Nowadays you just gotta yell at someone and have the incident misrepresented on YouTube to be crucified. Amazing.
Click to expand...
Yeah because the dude flipped out and went bad poop crazy over nothing. He's clearly a liability for the police department
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#131
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#131
Dude653 said:
Yeah because the dude flipped out and went bad poop crazy over nothing. He's clearly a liability for the police department
Click to expand...
wait until the investigation is over and the suspension is removed. It won't be a front page story like this one is, it'll probably be put on page 20 of the local paper, misrepresented, and then quietly corrected by the editor a week later. Welcome to the American dismedia.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#132
Mar 19, 2011
12,662
1,098
113
#132
Runningman said:
wait until the investigation is over and the suspension is removed. It won't be a front page story like this one is, it'll probably be put on page 20 of the local paper, misrepresented, and then quietly corrected by the editor a week later. Welcome to the American dismedia.
Click to expand...
First thing they need to do is give him a drug screen because normal people don't act like this
While there is no video, nothing in her voice or speech patterns indicates that she's being aggressive
So if he flipped out like this over a cigarette citation this it's only a matter of time before he snaps and hurts or kill someone for no reason
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#133
Mar 19, 2011
12,662
1,098
113
#133
Runningman said:
I've already said what I believe about this video. I don't see how answering these questions is important at this point. You're free to believe whatever you want. I am going to go out on a limb and speculate we're going to disagree. For example, you think telling someone to not talk is a violation of their rights and that police officers who make mistakes are just as guilty as criminals who unknowingly break the law. It's difficult to hold a rational conversation under that pretense.

I guess you're probably an anti-cop activist hence the username EndQualifiedImmunity.
Click to expand...
That was a nice dodge. Threatening to arrest someone for speaking is a violation of someone's free speech.
I kinda wish he had arrested her because lawyers would have been lined up around the block to take a false imprisonment lawsuit
 
Handyman62

Handyman62

Well-known member
#134
Jan 10, 2021
599
266
63
Rural South Carolina
#134
shittim said:
Entrapment is the foundation of sting operations by wayward authorities, the forfeiture laws are another area of potential abuse.
Ramping up the emotion to instigate a negative reaction from a citizen, a loose cannon with a gun a badge and a fast car.:unsure:
Click to expand...
Civil asset forfeiture abuse is running rampant in the US and in most states along with the federal government and local law enforcement they can seize cash and other items without ever charging the owners with a crime. And when the owners try to get their cash/items back they are told they will have to take them to court which means also hiring an expensive Lawyer.
Often times it's nearly impossible to get their stuff back. Local law enforcement may say they no longer have it because they turned it over to the federal government (the federal government often times kicks 20% back to them) and then federal government will say we don't have your money /items either.
Here's a video of Steve Lehto talking about Civil asset forfeiture. It's just one of many videos he has made on the subject.

 
R

Runningman

Banned
#135
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#135
Dude653 said:
That was a nice dodge. Threatening to arrest someone for speaking is a violation of someone's free speech.
I kinda wish he had arrested her because lawyers would have been lined up around the block to take a false imprisonment lawsuit
Click to expand...
The audio clip in the video has been tampered with. Notice it's a bit choppy, suddenly drops off mid sentence, then picks up again. It's not admissible as evidence. And besides, she wasn't sitting down and probably interfering with his line of duty or otherwise obstructing justice somehow. In commuting a crime, many rights and liberties are lost. She's lucky all she got was a verbal warning.

And by the way, I dodged that list of questions because I don't like where the conversation was going. I don't want to get into the weeds of all of that with an activist. I'd rather stay on topic.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#136
Jul 3, 2015
59,865
29,246
113
#136
Runningman said:
She was told to sit down. The only time a cop would shout at someone to sit down is if they are way out of line. Sorry, I am with the cop here. She's clearly out to get someone and she has a motive too. Her business had a sting operation launched on it. That much is sure.
Click to expand...
He started yelling and spewing profanity at her as soon as she started to make her case with him on the phone... which he had actually given her permission to do, but as soon as he realized she had a leg to stand on, he began his abusive rants at her. She was not in the wrong to take a tape recorder and tape the proceedings either. You want to make out that it was shady on her part to do so, but given how he acted from the get-go, she was very wise to do so. She had not committed any crime. You deliberately keep overlooking that fact.
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#137
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#137
Magenta said:
He started yelling and spewing profanity at her as soon as she started to make her case with him on the phone... which he had actually given her permission to do, but as soon as he realized she had a leg to stand on, he began his abusive rants at her. She was not in the wrong to take a tape recorder and tape the proceedings either. You want to make out that it was shady on her part to do so, but given how he acted from the get-go, she was very wise to do so. She had not committed any crime. You deliberately keep overlooking that fact.
Click to expand...
ah you didn't watch the video either. They edited recording of the officer yelling and cussing is from a recording she took with her cell phone when she went into the police station, baited him, and provoked him. They didn't let us hear the alleged altercation that supposedly took place on the phone. It probably didn't happen. :)

and notice they played the audio recording two times. The first time they introduce the cop as yelling and cussing immediately because the audio clip is altered. They want our first impression of him to be as an unhinged aggressor while the whole time they represent her as a victim. I'm not buying it. The second time they play the recording he has a calm demeanor until she obviously is standing up and approaching him I guess. The details aren't 100% clear.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#138
Jul 3, 2015
59,865
29,246
113
#138
Runningman said:
ah you didn't watch the video either. The edited recording of the officer yelling
and cussing is from a recording she took with her cell phone when she went into
the police station, baited him, and provoked him. They didn't let us hear the alleged
altercation that took place on the phone. It probably didn't happen. :)
Click to expand...
I did watch the video. Wow, your view is so skewed. Baiting? Provoking? Yeah, on his part.
 
Dude653

Dude653

Senior Member
#139
Mar 19, 2011
12,662
1,098
113
#139
Runningman said:
The audio clip in the video has been tampered with. Notice it's a bit choppy, suddenly drops off mid sentence, then picks up again. It's not admissible as evidence. And besides, she wasn't sitting down and probably interfering with his line of duty or otherwise obstructing justice somehow. In commuting a crime, many rights and liberties are lost. She's lucky all she got was a verbal warning.

And by the way, I dodged that list of questions because I don't like where the conversation was going. I don't want to get into the weeds of all of that with an activist. I'd rather stay on topic.
Click to expand...
The questions were on topic you just dodged them
Also, obstruction how? She complied by showing up in person as the officer requested
 
R

Runningman

Banned
#140
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,691
113
#140
Magenta said:
I did watch the video. Wow, your view is so skewed. Baiting? Provoking? Yeah, on his part.
Click to expand...
"He started yelling and spewing profanity at her as soon as she started to make her case with him on the phone.. "

This never happened in the video because they didn't let us hear the phone call.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.