You're quoting him as a credible source when he is a known grifter and con artist
No I didn't. Your characterization is misleading.
I said he had said there would be false flag cyber attacks on the US blamed on Russia and a few days later we had cyber attacks on the US blamed on Russia.
Now either you believe that is a coincidence or you don't. I don't believe in coincidences.
It is unnecessary to argue whether or not he is credible, his comments are documented and recorded on these platforms and millions of people have copies of them. This is what is known as evidence and facts, not testimony.
I didn't reference him as a witness, or as a credible witness.
It is a fact that can be proved that he said something would happen which very clearly did happen (cyber attack on the US blamed on Russia).
Now he says that is a false flag, ie, Russia didn't do it. I can't prove that one way or the other. I do have an opinion concerning the motive, and that is that it is every bit as implausible that Russia would want to do this attack as it was that they would want to blow up their own pipeline. So I am certainly not going to listen to these various MSM outlets trying to manipulate the populace like they did with the pipeline. I also don't believe this was a coincidence. But that is the sum of my opinion.
Perhaps you missed the fact that he had predicted this event several days beforehand. I didn't quote him then, that would be using him as a credible witness. However, after the attack came I noted that Alex Jones had predicted this several days earlier, that is evidence.