Essentially, God's very Name is "Presence," and there is no existence apart from Him so, why wouldn't it make sense that to go from His presence translates to going from existence into non-existence?Why not? Why would a spirit cease to exist?
Essentially, God's very Name is "Presence," and there is no existence apart from Him so, why wouldn't it make sense that to go from His presence translates to going from existence into non-existence?Why not? Why would a spirit cease to exist?
be honest, if you had proof for your flimsy man made doctrine you’d have quoted a wall of verses like I do. You have nothing man. Just a bunch of projection and assumptions.
I don't consider it to be impossible.Do you think John was using "the same poetic device" when He wrote Rev 20:10, or Jesus, when He said Matt 25:46?
Whereas the only power satan has is to destroy, God has both the power to create (and I mean in the sense 'out of nothing' rather than manipulating what God has already created) and destroy and it isn't beyond God's character to destroy what He had created.I would imagine to soften the heart of those who just can't imagine that God would cause never ending torment.
How about very nearly impossible?I don't consider it to be impossible.
Essentially, God's very Name is "Presence," and there is no existence apart from Him so, why wouldn't it make sense that to go from His presence translates to going from existence into non-existence?
Not really. In Job, we see that Satan had the power to create a wind strong enough to collapse a building where ALL of Job's children were attending, and were killed. And Satan killed ALL of Job's cattle, etc, basically all his wealth.Whereas the only power satan has is to destroy
I have no doubt that God is able to create ex nihilio (out of nothing) and to vaporize whatever He wants. The Bible SAYS He is able to destroy. OK.God has both the power to create (and I mean in the sense 'out of nothing' rather than manipulating what God has already created) and destroy and it isn't beyond God's character to destroy what He had created.
I wonder what proponents of eternal conscious torment do with verses wherein God proclaimsWhereas the only power satan has is to destroy, God has both the power to create (and I mean in the sense 'out of nothing' rather than manipulating what God has already created) and destroy and it isn't beyond God's character to destroy what He had created.
and it isn't beyond God's character to destroy what He had created.
I would imagine to soften the heart of those who just can't imagine that God would cause never ending torment.
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.And where do we see God putting something out of existence (oblivion,
nothingness) in the spiritual world in scripture to support your assertion?
I wonder what proponents of eternal conscious torment do with verses wherein God proclaims
He is making all things new...
One thing is cetainly possible. John was referring to what will remain on the new earth. It won't be unbelievers.and that those things which can be shaken will not remain.
I haven't swept anything under the rug. I've been explaining to Runningman that all the verses he quotes refer to the bodily destruction of unbelievers, who will experience physical death TWICE.The plethora of verses that proclaim the destruction of the wicked all get
swept under the rug in favor of their meagre verses that seem to contradict.
The only "progress" we need to see is of the impossibility of tormenting someone who isn't there, doesn't exist.
Tormenting is an experience, a very unpleasant one. If a person is vaporized and no longer exists, there is nothing to experience.
Now, if you would admit that, there would be progress.
Please explain what part of Matt 25:46 and Rev 20:10 is an assumption?Your assumption is that God causes never ended torment for all unsaved.
That is a delirious statement. Take your temp. Just look above. You haven't proven it means anything else.You don’t hVe a verse that clearly supports your doctrine.
Of course you won't. You are too emotionally invested in your own opinion.I’ll never admit that at this point.
Oh, stop making knuckleheaded snipes. as if. Grow up.When I was an immature Christian I believed in what you do, but then I read the Bible.
You can't unprove Matt 25:46 or Rev 20:10. But you can fantasize.The Bible is quite conclusive on the final destination of the unsaved: it’s death of the soul and body.
Exactly. They no longer exist. However in the theology of ECT, they are carried over to be tormented forever after.Given where this verse is found in Revelation, the unbelivevers have already been dispatched to the LOF. So it doesn't refer to them.
Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
I highly doubt it. It is before everything is made new.One thing is cetainly possible. John was referring to what will remain on the new earth. It won't be unbelievers.
Please explain what part of Matt 25:46 and Rev 20:10 is an assumption?
That is a delirious statement. Take your temp. Just look above. You haven't proven it means anything else.
I take them at face value. You can fantasize all you want.
Who teaches this?Heaven and earth is symbolic of the temple in Jerusalem which was destroyed as Jesus predicted.