When they were trying to pass gay marriage it was just a front to open up more perversion the devil is trying to implement as being normal or a choice. It was the beginning of lowering the age of consent for a child, bestiality and any other distorted perverse notion. It isn't about them having certain rights but protecting those who do not have a say. Do we truly want your child at age 6 marrying a 60 yr. old man ? The whole thing makes me cringe at Sodom and Gamora attitude of society.
Next Big Debate, Obergefell v. Hodges, Gay Marriage
- Thread starter Roughsoul1991
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You insist America was founded as a Christian Theocracy.
America's history proves that Christian Theocracy you espouse existed made enslavement of persons a matter of law.
https://today.law.harvard.edu/understanding-the-legacy-of-slavery/
The 13th amendment freed the slaves kept in this Christian Theocracy. Not all slaves, but many.
1 Peter 2:
18 You who are slaves must submit to your masters with all respect. Do what they tell you—not only if they are kind and reasonable, but even if are cruel. 19 For God is pleased when conscious of his will, you patiently endure unjust treatment.
Slavery in America began in 1526.
America's history proves that Christian Theocracy you espouse existed made enslavement of persons a matter of law.
https://today.law.harvard.edu/understanding-the-legacy-of-slavery/
The 13th amendment freed the slaves kept in this Christian Theocracy. Not all slaves, but many.
1 Peter 2:
18 You who are slaves must submit to your masters with all respect. Do what they tell you—not only if they are kind and reasonable, but even if are cruel. 19 For God is pleased when conscious of his will, you patiently endure unjust treatment.
Slavery in America began in 1526.
Sounds like you're trying to preserve a nation that will eventually succumb to the Anti-Christ with all other nations. That's unbiblical and uninformed.
But, you're heading into QAnon territory with some of your posts, so I discern you are unable to see the truth of these things. You are victim of the great delusion and American idolitry. Consequently, your message has no value to the kingdom of God.
But, you're heading into QAnon territory with some of your posts, so I discern you are unable to see the truth of these things. You are victim of the great delusion and American idolitry. Consequently, your message has no value to the kingdom of God.
-
1
- Show all
Of course.
And that is how corrupt this nation is. The mere fact we have to debate these issues, officially, should be enough to prove we are not a Christian nation. In a Christian nation God would simply decree what is truth and the people would follow. Here, there people make up their own laws often contrary to God's character.
Lol,
Wilson started the Professionalization of Government. The Theory that Educated Officers trained to be in government, instead of appointed temporarily to take positions. would bring a betterment to the US. That is now bearing Fruit.
A clear separation of Powers in the Constitution, is mocked as QAnon.
lol.
Wilson started the Professionalization of Government. The Theory that Educated Officers trained to be in government, instead of appointed temporarily to take positions. would bring a betterment to the US. That is now bearing Fruit.
A clear separation of Powers in the Constitution, is mocked as QAnon.
lol.
We are a Christian nation. Our Mass Media continues to hypnotize you into thinking your neighbors are too crazy to live, but they've been in that house for 3 generations, and are doing just fine.
Stop listening to the D&R from DC, which is all just Mercenary and Mercenary Soldiers, who are not Content with their Pay, but instead need a larger budget, to get more interns, to get more free time and lighter work load.
Either The People are the nation, or the Government is the Nation. If the Government is the nation, The People are Subjects.
You get what you want.
Stop listening to the D&R from DC, which is all just Mercenary and Mercenary Soldiers, who are not Content with their Pay, but instead need a larger budget, to get more interns, to get more free time and lighter work load.
Either The People are the nation, or the Government is the Nation. If the Government is the nation, The People are Subjects.
You get what you want.
Defamation is a sin.
You're out of line.
Either the US is authored and sustained by The People, or it's not that nation. I approve of the Constitution, but then I've read it.
You approve of a Top Down Oligarchy that lies openly about its goals, and deceives its own people, having told you it would do so.
You don't even know the US when its basic principles are given.
At no point was the Right of Family given to The State nor The Federal. Not once has The Constitution amended to this.
Ever.
You're out of line.
Either the US is authored and sustained by The People, or it's not that nation. I approve of the Constitution, but then I've read it.
You approve of a Top Down Oligarchy that lies openly about its goals, and deceives its own people, having told you it would do so.
You don't even know the US when its basic principles are given.
At no point was the Right of Family given to The State nor The Federal. Not once has The Constitution amended to this.
Ever.
proselytize—
- To attempt to convert someone to one's own religious faith.
- To attempt to persuade someone to join one's own political party or to espouse one's doctrine.
- To convert (a person) from one belief, doctrine, cause, or faith to another.
(Having undertaken for the Glory of God and advancement of the Christian Faith and Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the First Colony in the Northern Parts of Virginia, )
Esacaping persecution was what led them to Holland but Holland culture was becoming more pagan and that led them to seek the new world in order to build a colony and advance the gospel. In which they did to the Indians.
That is ultimately what led to King Philips War (Indian). By that time many Indians had adopted the Christian faith and he felt it to be a threat to his pagan practices.
King Philip's War (sometimes called the First Indian War, Metacom's War, Metacomet's War, Pometacomet's Rebellion, or Metacom's Rebellion) was an armed conflict in 1675-1678 between indigenous inhabitants of New England and New England colonists and their indigenous allies. The war is named for Metacom, the Wampanoag chief who adopted the name Philip because of the friendly relations between his father Massasoit and the Mayflower Pilgrims.
The crux of your falsehood.
That "advancing the gospel" implies first, the Prostylitizing to non-believers. This might have made sense, if they were not sending their entire homes. But they moved, to avoid persecution, and they found that Holland was not of their tastes.
So to secure their own worship, which they believed guided by the Holy Spriit, at least by narrative, they moved. That there were sinners in the area was not their primary concern. One of their concerns was getting away from European monarchs who thought that Government was God's way to the Betterment of the People.
In either event, you have to read into "advance the Gospel" to prove the Redefinition of their Stated Causes.
That "advancing the gospel" implies first, the Prostylitizing to non-believers. This might have made sense, if they were not sending their entire homes. But they moved, to avoid persecution, and they found that Holland was not of their tastes.
So to secure their own worship, which they believed guided by the Holy Spriit, at least by narrative, they moved. That there were sinners in the area was not their primary concern. One of their concerns was getting away from European monarchs who thought that Government was God's way to the Betterment of the People.
In either event, you have to read into "advance the Gospel" to prove the Redefinition of their Stated Causes.
lol, The Sword of State will keep us faithful to God?
The sword will only punish us when we stray into sin. Are you sure that you want a sword?
What about keeping a good marriage, since we're keeping marriages?
You must spend more time sitting with your wife doing puzzels and talking, or you get the sword.
You must buy your wife flowers every 5th day, but not for the same reason, and not just because we say so, or you get the sword.
The sword will only punish us when we stray into sin. Are you sure that you want a sword?
What about keeping a good marriage, since we're keeping marriages?
You must spend more time sitting with your wife doing puzzels and talking, or you get the sword.
You must buy your wife flowers every 5th day, but not for the same reason, and not just because we say so, or you get the sword.
That's happening already.
Not just Islamists.
Years ago a famous actor was found to have taken a child bride. They met when she was 12. Married when she was 15 or 16, because her parents signed the marriage consent form.
Islam's child bride practice still happens here. They're marriage is in the eyes of Allah and sometimes the rite takes place in the mosque.
Morning plural marriage happens too. In face networks like A&E and Lifetime make reality series out of it.
Ever heard of the show Sister Wives?
Again, like someone here espoused possible for Christians and outside state controls, the man is married in the eyes of God and the faith. With no marriage license on file it is not legally considered bigomy.
In fairness and equality women Mormons should be able to have plural husbands too. But we know better. Lord knows, one is enough. 😆
Not just Islamists.
Years ago a famous actor was found to have taken a child bride. They met when she was 12. Married when she was 15 or 16, because her parents signed the marriage consent form.
Islam's child bride practice still happens here. They're marriage is in the eyes of Allah and sometimes the rite takes place in the mosque.
Morning plural marriage happens too. In face networks like A&E and Lifetime make reality series out of it.
Ever heard of the show Sister Wives?
Again, like someone here espoused possible for Christians and outside state controls, the man is married in the eyes of God and the faith. With no marriage license on file it is not legally considered bigomy.
In fairness and equality women Mormons should be able to have plural husbands too. But we know better. Lord knows, one is enough. 😆
I posted the entire Mayflower Compact, it says only "advance the gospel" which has nothing to say about proselytizing Indians, since they had Families they were protecting from bad teaching.
As for William Bradford, please help me by finding the date so I can see these for myself? Were these pre or post landing?
As for William Bradford, please help me by finding the date so I can see these for myself? Were these pre or post landing?
I would propose changing the Constitution to specify that we are a Christian Nation, and the only religion accepted is the faith of Jesus Christ as Savior, whatever that form takes. Because that's what the US Founders expected.
But then, they also expected we'd fall apart and have to get violent within a few hundred years. So I guess they weren't right on anything.
But then, they also expected we'd fall apart and have to get violent within a few hundred years. So I guess they weren't right on anything.
-
1
- Show all
What does the Bible say about remarrying? That is where you should start.
Do you believe the 1st Amendment is giving power to the state or federal government? No it takes power away.
We need marriage as defined by God protected under law for national security. Making anything else illegal. No government should have the power to enforce anything else that isn't a marriage defined by God.
I'm starting to think no one studies sociology and how important this is to civilization.
Do you believe the 1st Amendment is giving power to the state or federal government? No it takes power away.
We need marriage as defined by God protected under law for national security. Making anything else illegal. No government should have the power to enforce anything else that isn't a marriage defined by God.
I'm starting to think no one studies sociology and how important this is to civilization.