Did Jesus drink alcohol?
- Thread starter AndrewMorgan
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Remember the first miracle of Jesus, turning water into wine at a wedding in Cana...... Jesus humself must have drunk a little bit of wine himself, i think it would have been an affront in these days not to have to.
Everything you need to know you have in the words of Christ throughout the bible, your most valuable source of info. Blessings
JF
Everything you need to know you have in the words of Christ throughout the bible, your most valuable source of info. Blessings
JF
-
5
-
1
-
1
- Show all
One thing we know for certain. It was common to dilute wine with two to three parts water. It is documented in many sources from the time. All historians agree that it was the culture. I don't find many interested in diluting their wine today which suggest that their motives are not good. So never let anyone tell you that Jesus or the Christians drank the same strength of wine you buy today. Unless you dilute it with two to three parts water which was the common custom at that time.
This can be discovered with a Google search. That is how plentiful the ancient documentation is to support this cultural fact. Even Plato wrote about it. There are lots of documents from the time about it. It is not even a debate among historians. Only uneducated debate it.
This can be discovered with a Google search. That is how plentiful the ancient documentation is to support this cultural fact. Even Plato wrote about it. There are lots of documents from the time about it. It is not even a debate among historians. Only uneducated debate it.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
- Show all
J
The reason they called Jesus a winebibber and a glutton is because he ate with those who were known to be such. In that culture and religious teachings it was considered condoning the sins of the people you had food fellowship with.
They just assumed that if Jesus was eating with sinners who were known to be town drunks, miscreants and naredowells he was probably drinking as heavy as they were known to do. It's not that they had any proof of Jesus drinking.
I don't believe it was ever a sin to drink diluted wine but that is not why they called him a winebibber. It was because of the company he kept.
There were known drunkards, gluttons and prostitutes who were among that dinner party and therefore in their minds Jesus was probably guilty of doing the same things. They believed that if he was a real prophet he would know not to eat with such heathens.
They just assumed that if Jesus was eating with sinners who were known to be town drunks, miscreants and naredowells he was probably drinking as heavy as they were known to do. It's not that they had any proof of Jesus drinking.
I don't believe it was ever a sin to drink diluted wine but that is not why they called him a winebibber. It was because of the company he kept.
There were known drunkards, gluttons and prostitutes who were among that dinner party and therefore in their minds Jesus was probably guilty of doing the same things. They believed that if he was a real prophet he would know not to eat with such heathens.
-
1
- Show all
Well it's obscured by the original language as "blood of the grape" in literal terms but Hebrew is a metaphoric language...
We know from anthropology that there were several types of wine including fortified wines, aperitif, liquor and jam made from grapes all with the same label. They also made beer and many liked it....the vinegar they gave Jesus was a type of drink using vinegar and water but still had some sugar...almost a lemonade.
Kinda interesting stuff when you look at it.
We know from anthropology that there were several types of wine including fortified wines, aperitif, liquor and jam made from grapes all with the same label. They also made beer and many liked it....the vinegar they gave Jesus was a type of drink using vinegar and water but still had some sugar...almost a lemonade.
Kinda interesting stuff when you look at it.
-
1
- Show all
Yes, he did. Consider the topography of Jesus day.
Wine nourishes the body. And when water is not the "turn the tap and drink your fill" luxury it is for us today, a life saver.
Remember too, the wedding at Cana. Just turned water stored in stone jars I to wine at his mother's request.
If drinking alcoholic beverages is a sin, Jesus contributed to sinners ability to sin by making jars full of wine. Rather than leaving the people water to drink.
Of course Jesus could never sin.
Drinking alcoholic beverages is not a sin. Becoming drunk, losing or compromising your faculties, is.
Hope that helps.
Wine nourishes the body. And when water is not the "turn the tap and drink your fill" luxury it is for us today, a life saver.
Remember too, the wedding at Cana. Just turned water stored in stone jars I to wine at his mother's request.
If drinking alcoholic beverages is a sin, Jesus contributed to sinners ability to sin by making jars full of wine. Rather than leaving the people water to drink.
Of course Jesus could never sin.
Drinking alcoholic beverages is not a sin. Becoming drunk, losing or compromising your faculties, is.
Hope that helps.
-
4
-
2
-
1
- Show all
From what I have learned, they had "new wine," that being wine not yet fermited, and they had fermited wine. I would expect Jesus drank both at one time or another.
That being said, there is a huge difference between wine and "alcohol." Alcohol brings to mind strong drink such as whiskey or some such. I do not believe Jesus ever drank such as these, and there is no evidence that I have found that He did.
Do not know this Pastor Anderson person, so can not comment on the truth of his teachings..
That being said, there is a huge difference between wine and "alcohol." Alcohol brings to mind strong drink such as whiskey or some such. I do not believe Jesus ever drank such as these, and there is no evidence that I have found that He did.
Do not know this Pastor Anderson person, so can not comment on the truth of his teachings..
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yes. As well, the Apostle Paul spoke of such in his instructions to those desiring to be Bishops or Deacons in 1st Timothy, Chapter 3:
1This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
2A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
3Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
4One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
5(For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
8Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;
This tells me that Paul did not believe Bishops should partake of ferminted wine AT ALL, and Deacons only a wee bit!
Boy, that teaching didn't last through the ages did it?
1This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
2A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
3Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
4One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
5(For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
8Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;
This tells me that Paul did not believe Bishops should partake of ferminted wine AT ALL, and Deacons only a wee bit!
Boy, that teaching didn't last through the ages did it?
-
3
-
1
- Show all
John Gill:
or for wine, or for strong drink;
to drink with his food, whether wine or any other liquor; the Targum of Jonathan is, wine new or old, which he chose; but the latter, strong drink, Aben Ezra says, was a liquor made of honey and of dates, of wheat and of barley:
here:
Deuteronomy 14 Commentary - John Gill's Exposition of …
However, this is under the 1st Covenant is it not? From all the Scriptures in the New Testament, it is clear to me that Jesus did drink fermited wine, but there is no evidence He drank "hard liquor." Having a glass of wine is not a sin, but drinking wine until one is drunk IS.....
Luke 7:33,34
1 Corinthians 6:2
or for wine, or for strong drink;
to drink with his food, whether wine or any other liquor; the Targum of Jonathan is, wine new or old, which he chose; but the latter, strong drink, Aben Ezra says, was a liquor made of honey and of dates, of wheat and of barley:
here:
Deuteronomy 14 Commentary - John Gill's Exposition of …
However, this is under the 1st Covenant is it not? From all the Scriptures in the New Testament, it is clear to me that Jesus did drink fermited wine, but there is no evidence He drank "hard liquor." Having a glass of wine is not a sin, but drinking wine until one is drunk IS.....
Luke 7:33,34
1 Corinthians 6:2
-
2
-
1
- Show all