Research: Majority of Americans Believe Works Are the Key to Salvation

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
What Catholics believe and what Protestants believe, is of no concern to me.
It should be, for the Papacy is the predicted Antichrist of Bible prophecy, and Protestantism exposed it as such.
Actually, you also preach that the law must be strictly obeyed.
"Hereby we do know Him if we keep His commandments." 1 John 2:3 KJV
Transgression of the law is also sin, within your interpretation.
"Sin is the transgression of the law". 1 John 3:4 KJV
Works are not the evidence of salvation
"He that saith, I know Him, and keepeth not His commandments is a liar and (Jesus) is not in him."
anyone can occupy themselves with works.
"Because the carnal mind...is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be".
There is only one sure way to know that someone is saved and loved by Jesus. If that someone expresses love towards the brethren, agape love.
"Hereby we do know that we love the children of God when we love God and keep His commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments, and His commandments are not grievous." 1 John 5:2-3 KJV
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,778
113
It should be, for the Papacy is the predicted Antichrist of Bible prophecy, and Protestantism exposed it as such.
If that is true, then the Papacy should have been limited to just 3 1/2 years. And since that is not the case, the Papacy is NOT the Antichrist (who is a man, an individual, an evil person).
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
when i search the internet for this exact quote, the only place it is found anywhere is right here in this forum in your post.

who are you claiming says this?
do you have any evidence anyone says this except you?
It's not an exact quote, but if you'd like, I'll find it for you - it's essentially the same.

BTW, quotes that were nothing to find 5+ years ago seem to be disappearing as prophesied polarization of Christians toward either true Protestantism and Catholicism continues.

And, who does Catholicism consider the only credible, true Protestants?

"Reason and common sense demand the one or the other of the two alternatives. Either Protestantism and teh keeping holy of Saturday or Catholicity and the keeping holy of Sunday. Compromise is impossible."
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
for @Phoneman-777 lest he claim it isn't so:

καὶ ἐμίσησεν αὐτὴν Αμνων μῗσος μέγα σφόδρα ὅτι μέγα τὸ μῗσος ὃ ἐμίσησεν αὐτήν ὑπὲρ τὴν ἀγάπην ἣν ἠγάπησεν αὐτήν καὶ εἶπεν αὐτῇ Αμνων ἀνάστηθι καὶ πορεύου
(2 Samuel 13:15 LXX)
Another day, another failure of Posthuman to refute my OSAS destroying argument that the "many" of Matthew 24:12 KJV who will be lost must be SAINTS because "agape" is demonstrated only by happily keeping God's commandments while the wicked can't keep them even if they wanted to.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
Let's not play games here. Deal with what I said. .
Did you miss the part where I dealt with your habit of selecting only verses which support your conclusions and ignore verses which shed additional light on the issue which forces the abandonment of said conclusion and consideration of another conclusion?


Yes, I did. You're failing to understand the difference between a shepherd who falls asleep and wakes up to find he's lost sheep to thieves, wolves, disease, etc., and sheep who outrun the shepherd into the wilderness.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
So the rest the Bible is talking about, is in the future. Nothing wrong with finding peace or having a peace of mind through Jesus, but when Paul talks about rest, he's referring to the future.
There is a present rest (sabbath)

(Mat 11:28) Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
(Mat 11:29) Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
(Mat 11:30) For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

The rest that is future will be at the redemption of our bodies.

Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
(1Co 15:51-57)
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
If that is true, then the Papacy should have been limited to just 3 1/2 years. And since that is not the case, the Papacy is NOT the Antichrist (who is a man, an individual, an evil person).
day/year principle..."each day for a year".

3 1/2 symbolic years = 1260 symbolic days

1260 symbolic days = 1260 literal years.

The papacy reigned from 538 to 1798 which is 1260 years.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
day/year principle..."each day for a year".

3 1/2 symbolic years = 1260 symbolic days

1260 symbolic days = 1260 literal years.

The papacy reigned from 538 to 1798 which is 1260 years.
After 31/2 year is milenium isn't it's.
Is that mean after1798 milenium an we are in it?
 
Oct 6, 2021
496
83
28
No,
'law of Moses' is God's terminology, and He calls it His own commandments, for Israel:.
Okay Post..,I think I have irrefutable proof for you, that the Ten Commandments are...shall we say, "Grandfathered", into the New Covenant.
Eternal life was not promised to those under the Law of Moses..correct?
So....Eternal Life was only offered under the New Covenant.
When a man asked Jesus, What he must do to have Eternal life?...The answer Jesus gave him, was by accord of the New Covenant.

His answer...."Keep the Commandments". The Man then asked, "Which ones?" Jesus said unto Him, “‘Thou shalt do no murder; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not bear false witness; honor thy father and thy mother (Matthew 19:18&19)

Jesus gave this man five of the Ten Commandments...to keep.
If he told this man the truth, the Ten Commandments are still in play. If he lied to this man, the Ten Commandments are obviously not part of the New Covenant....for it would show that Jesus sinned.

Now...you must decide, Did Jesus tell him the Truth, or did Jesus bear false witness?
Yes..or No?
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,409
1,007
113
Is it possible Paul took the time to speak directly to the Jews but also spoke to the Gentiles? After all, the book is not called "Roman Jews", it's called "Romans", right?
Paul definitely spoke directly to the Jews and rebuked them. As the verse below states.

Romans 2:23-24
You who boast in the Law, through your breaking the Law, do you dishonor God? For “the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you,” just as it is written.

The letter to the Romans also explains the history of the law and Israel, to the Gentiles.

This is important to understand because Paul is discussing the law and faith. If one assumes that Paul is talking only to the Gentiles, then one would assume naturally. That the Gentiles are under the law, which they are not.

Romans 4:13-15
For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith. For if those who are of the Law are heirs, then faith is made void and the promise is nullified; for the Law brings about wrath, but where there is no law, there also is no violation.

If you place the Gentiles under the law, then you are subjecting the Gentiles to the wrath of God.

where there is no law, there also is no violation.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
His answer...."Keep the Commandments". The Man then asked, "Which ones?" Jesus said unto Him, “‘Thou shalt do no murder; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not bear false witness; honor thy father and thy mother (Matthew 19:18&19)
Keep the sabbath not include

The man ask which one, he seem expect Jesus not say all
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,980
13,627
113
Okay Post..,I think I have irrefutable proof for you, that the Ten Commandments are...shall we say, "Grandfathered", into the New Covenant.
Eternal life was not promised to those under the Law of Moses..correct?
So....Eternal Life was only offered under the New Covenant.
When a man asked Jesus, What he must do to have Eternal life?...The answer Jesus gave him, was by accord of the New Covenant.

His answer...."Keep the Commandments". The Man then asked, "Which ones?" Jesus said unto Him, “‘Thou shalt do no murder; thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not bear false witness; honor thy father and thy mother (Matthew 19:18&19)

Jesus gave this man five of the Ten Commandments...to keep.
If he told this man the truth, the Ten Commandments are still in play. If he lied to this man, the Ten Commandments are obviously not part of the New Covenant....for it would show that Jesus sinned.

Now...you must decide, Did Jesus tell him the Truth, or did Jesus bear false witness?
Yes..or No?
the man asked "what may i do to inherit eternal life"

is that our faith, that we "do" in order to inherit salvation?
or that we believe?




For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.” But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the just shall live by faith.” Yet the law is not of faith, but “the man who does them shall live by them.”
Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”), that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
Brethren, I speak in the manner of men: Though it is only a man’s covenant, yet if it is confirmed, no one annuls or adds to it. Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ. And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect. For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator. Now a mediator does not mediate for one only, but God is one.
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law. But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.
(Galatians 3:10-25)
clearly, that we believe.
as i showed you earlier, when Paul says '
the law' he includes the 10 commandments - see Romans 7 again.


Christ did not say to Nicodemus, "God so loved the world that He sent His only Son so that whosoever keeps the 10 commandments shall have eternal life"
He said "He that believes"
Christ did not say to Mary "
I AM the Resurrection and the Life; He that keeps the 10 commandments, though he may die, he shall live, and he that lives and keeps the 10 commandments shall never die"
what He said was this:


I AM the Resurrection and the Life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live,
and whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?
(John 11:25-26)

do you believe this?
if you don't, then so be it.
but if you do -- then clearly Matthew 19 is much more complex than the superficial gloss you presented, and rightly interpreting it is going to take much more discussion.
if we know the gospel, then what He says to this man should smack us like a brick wall! as it did the disciples - because look, what did they say when they saw this? they were amazed, and said who then can be saved??
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,980
13,627
113
You might as well be Catholic, seeing your beliefs directly line up with Catholicism
if by this you mean that i believe Christ is God manifest in the flesh, Who was born of a virgin, gave Himself to be crucified, was resurrected, ascended, presented His blood in the true temple in heaven for the atonement of our sins, and Who will come again to gather His sheep to Himself & then to judge the quick & the dead -- then yes, those are my beliefs.

however if you think that makes me catholic - well, it does in the sense that 'catholic' literally means 'general' - but i am not a member of the RCC by any means, and you have a very perverse idea of what catholics actually believe, as witnessed earlier in this thread by two, both me giving you a link to actual catholic doctrine & by an actual catholic answering your slander.


do some real research, don't be a googlehead noodlehead.
now that's rich!
a slick televangelist on youtube is what you call "
real research" but you dismiss primary sources as fake!
ha!
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Roman 6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

I like to read part of the verse, because faster

The wage of sin is death

We all sinner so we are all guaranty face death penalty it is what bible say
None of this addresses what I posted. Why? And your first sentence doesn't make sense.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
Wrong. We have to consider ONLY the very clearly worded verses. And you guys don't have any.

Since Jesus SAID that recipients of eternal life shall never perish, He made very clear that there are NO CONDITIONS on recipients of eternal life to comply with in order to NOT perish.

Simply on the basis of being given that precious yet free gift, the recipient shall never never never, no not ever, perish.

That is the message from Jesus. Arminians seem to hate that message.
Would you give a verse that say we have only read part of the verse?
Well, another mysterious post from you. No idea what your point is. And you STILL don't address my points. Why?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
FreeGrace2 said:
He made very clear that there are NO CONDITIONS on recipients of eternal life to comply with in order to NOT perish.
Hmm,
We only need to believe a second than fell free to rob the bank for the rest of our life
Why does the teaching of Jesus BOTHER you so much? Why don't you believe what He teaches?

Why are you so AGAINST His teachings?

How about this: do you believe that a person who claims to be saved YET continues to reject what Jesus teaches will go to heaven?

Let's put YOUR own theology to the test, shall we?
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
2 Tim 3
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

Seem to me those verse encourage to consider all scripture

It say all scripture not say part scripture
Interesting. You acknowledge the verse is about ALL Scripture, yet you continue to reject specific teachings of Jesus regarding eternal security. Why do you do that? That is hypocrisy.

Will hypocrites go to heaven?