Don't think so
You are miss interpreting God's word.
It is His desire that no one is lost...thus ...it is His desire.
Don't think so
Does every believer always give thanks in everything? Nope, but it is the will of God.
18 In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
Is it Go’s will that believer’s sin? Do believer’s sin?
It is His desire that no one is lost...thus ...it is His desire.
No. I think you've misunderstood the point of the verse. Paul was informing them they were to give thanks for everything that was happening to them was because they were under, and was caused by, the "will of God in Christ". If I might paraphrase: " that which is happening to you is because you are under the will of God to suffer for Christ, so be thankful that it is happening to you because by it is a demonstration of your salvation".
I realize it is a subtle (yet important) distinction and difficult to see.
[1Th 5:18 KJV] 18 In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
Nope, you are reading through Calvin's goggles. It is God's will that we give thanks in everything.
Do you sin? Is sin God's will for your life? If we automatically did God's will there would be no need for scripture.
I don't know how to make it any clearer than this: if Christ's offering was intended by God for everyone as you imply, then everyone
must become saved regardless of whether they choose to accept it in order to be covered by it.
You simply do not understand God's permissive will. Though He desires that everyone be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth,I don't know how to make it any clearer than this: if Christ's offering was intended by God for everyone as you imply, then everyone must become saved regardless of whether they choose to accept it in order to be covered by it.
Another calvinist talking point that CANNOT be found in Scripture.The salvation transaction (so to speak) was entirely, and solely, between God the Father and Jesus Christ, which was accepted by the Father.
Ditto.Under those circumstances our acceptance of it has no bearing upon it.
You are quite confused.To say otherwise is to say that Christ's offering was insufficient for its intended purpose.
Let's continue a bit farther, shall we?Here, please read these verses closely:
[Jhn 6:37-39 KJV]
37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
This is only true, if Jesus died for the sin of unbelief. We find no mention any where in scripture that this is the case,
f Jesus died for the sin of unbelief. then even an unbeliever would be free of condemnation.
the ONLY thing that separates the lost from the saved is belief (saving faith)
he who believes is not condemned, He who does not believe is condemned already, why? Because God did not raise them up? Because God did not open their eyes? Because God did not regenerate them? No! Because they did not believe
What does John 10 have to do with John 1?
Election is based on the will of God
what is the will of God? Whoever sees and believes. (John 6)
many see and do not believe, because they harden their hearts.
Not because God prevented them from seeing
It is not a question of fairness.
It is a question of the integrity and reputation of our God.
Which God is more reputable.
one who picks and choses
or one who died for everyone. And out of love for them, refuses to push it on anyone. But out of love, Lffer it to them hoping they will recieve it.
Is that why he is not so patient?
Now, if you can find a verse that says that God causes people to listen and learn, be my guest.
....God's desire.
So then Christ only died for some sins but not all? Really? So by that you're actually saying that Christ isn't the Saviour.
As usual, your reply has no meat in it. It is no real response to my post. Just general observations as you see them.
The art of conversation and discussion is, I give my side in a focused, intelligible way and you respond in kind. Comments like you have above, mean nothing and say nothing, other than how you feel about the subject. Where is the evidence that directly refutes my conclusion? Where is the evidence that the Sheep are not a particular group? Where is the evidence that Election is not a particular number?
2 Pet 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
The logic of your post is absurd. Anyway, to answer your challenge:
Their eyes and ears had to first be blessed by God in order for them to understand.
They were given spiritual eyes and ears. They, nor anyone else, can see or hear unless that happens
[Mat 13:16 KJV] 16 But blessed [are] your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
[Mar 4:11-12 KJV]
11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all [these] things are done in parables:
12 That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and [their] sins should be forgiven them.
If Jesus paid for the sin of unbelief, then everyone would get to heaven
You might want to include these verses in your argument my friend.
No, you have it wrong. He didn't pay the price for the sins of everyone- He paid only for all of sins of those whom He had chosen at the foundation of the word including the sin of unbelief - paid in full for the elect.
I don't know how to make it any clearer than this: if Christ's offering was intended by God for everyone as you imply, then everyone
must become saved regardless of whether they choose to accept it in order to be covered by it. The salvation
transaction (so to speak) was entirely, and solely, between God the Father and Jesus Christ, which was accepted by the Father. Under those circumstances our acceptance of it has no bearing upon it. To say otherwise is to say that Christ's offering was insufficient for its intended purpose. Here, please read these verses closely:
[Jhn 6:37-39 KJV]
37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.