Are we in court? Here is the context
Matt 5:25Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
I am saying you are peddling a doctrine not espoused by the Scriptures.
Just look at what you said about the the pain of the rich guy. This is the behaviour of an ideologue. I can almost hear the cackling laughter (I think it was the caps)
I did a study of the terms eternal correlated with torment, etc 5 times in the NT out of 196 has hellish dimensions within the verse. 10 times if it is within the same chapter. The rest concerns life, joy happiness, kingdom, etc...
I don't make theology out of 5 verses where none are explicit. Only people who draw on their own imagination make things up to fill the gaps. It is self-evident as you quote only a few verses aeon to aeon.
Here is what is ironic. I happened on your spiel about Michael and Jesus. The very same principle you cite to reject Michael as Jesus is the same as when you consider hell. It is not explicitly written in the Scriptures.
This double standard is indicative of ideology, not belief.
Matt 5:25Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
I am saying you are peddling a doctrine not espoused by the Scriptures.
Just look at what you said about the the pain of the rich guy. This is the behaviour of an ideologue. I can almost hear the cackling laughter (I think it was the caps)
I did a study of the terms eternal correlated with torment, etc 5 times in the NT out of 196 has hellish dimensions within the verse. 10 times if it is within the same chapter. The rest concerns life, joy happiness, kingdom, etc...
I don't make theology out of 5 verses where none are explicit. Only people who draw on their own imagination make things up to fill the gaps. It is self-evident as you quote only a few verses aeon to aeon.
Here is what is ironic. I happened on your spiel about Michael and Jesus. The very same principle you cite to reject Michael as Jesus is the same as when you consider hell. It is not explicitly written in the Scriptures.
This double standard is indicative of ideology, not belief.
Luke 16
"The rich man also died"
"being in torments"
"he cried"
"I am tormented in this flame"
"this place of torment"