Is the first resurrection divided into two groups?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,922
2,005
113
But, then again, I realize this is probably not an traditional nor common understanding among scholars.
I had to come back to add to that thought before leaving for the day, that, traditionally, woman weren't commonly included in the conversation among scholars. I am familiar with the reasons why and do not necessarily agree which, of course, may be attributed to my bias as a woman, that is if it is not actually a valid disagreement. However, this cchat, many of the gentlemen, and ladies, that oft post here, have displayed to me as close as it comes to harmony restored to Eden, this side of heaven. This may not be much but, precious to me just the same. Muahh! God bless and keep you always.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,680
113
Then why doesn't the Bible say anything about another resurrection of the saved?? 1 Cor 15:23 alone refutes that idea. And then there are the numerous verses that speak of resurrection for either the saved or the unsaved in the SINGULAR.
It isn’t explicitly stated there are multiple resurrections of the saved, but it’s certainty implied in Daniel 12:2 and Matthew 27:52-53. Furthmore, Revelation 20:5 just plainly calls the post-millennium resurrection the first resurrection.

My last few posts exposes the contradictions caused by making Revelation 20:5 a resurrection of unbelievers. Such as requiring multiple second resurrection groups and even a third death.

At least there are no apparent contradictions in making Revelation 20:5 a resurrection of saints. I haven’t found any.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,680
113
I had to come back to add to that thought before leaving for the day, that, traditionally, woman weren't commonly included in the conversation among scholars. I am familiar with the reasons why and do not necessarily agree which, of course, may be attributed to my bias as a woman, that is if it is not actually a valid disagreement. However, this cchat, many of the gentlemen, and ladies, that oft post here, have displayed to me as close as it comes to harmony restored to Eden, this side of heaven. This may not be much but, precious to me just the same. Muahh! God bless and keep you always.
Personally I am not very traditional and find their sort of thinking incorrect. Actually, my default position is that most of what the mainstream church teaches is false. There’s too many denominations and that’s a problem for me. I’d rather go my own way, do the hard leg work that relatively few in the world want to do, and really dig into the Bible until I discover the truth.

On this path I lose friends, attract a lot of name calling and condemnation, but in the end I’ll stand before God knowing that I did everything I could do while mostly everyone else blindly followed, not doing their due diligence to be a Berean.

I’m not talking about any of us here. Actually we’re among the most serious Bible scholars in the world in my personal opinion, maybe even more so then students in seminary. Sure we disagree but we’re all in the Word daily sharpening our iron.

I don’t see gender anyway I just see we are all one in Christ like Galatians 3:28 says and I’m happy to Bible-discuss with you any time.

Sorry, I’m off my soap box now. Lol. I think we all have our moments.
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
It isn’t explicitly stated there are multiple resurrections of the saved, but it’s certainty implied in Daniel 12:2 and Matthew 27:52-53. Furthmore, Revelation 20:5 just plainly calls the post-millennium resurrection the first resurrection.
The Bible says there are 2 resurrections total; one for the saved and one for the unsaved.

Acts 24:15 - and I have the same hope in God as these men themselves have, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.

So the single resurrection of the saved is at the Second Advent, which is the FIRST of the 2 resurrections total.

My last few posts exposes the contradictions caused by making Revelation 20:5 a resurrection of unbelievers. Such as requiring multiple second resurrection groups and even a third death.
That is not my view though.

Since Acts 24:15 says 1 resurrection each, the ONE resurrection for the saved occurs at the Second Advent (1 Cor 15:23, 2 Thess 2:1) and the ONE resurrection for the unsaved occurs for the GWT judgment. Bingo! No contradiction.

At least there are no apparent contradictions in making Revelation 20:5 a resurrection of saints. I haven’t found any.
1 Cor 15:23 contradicts any resurrection that isn't "when He comes". And there is no such verse showing that Jesus will come back a 3rd time, since the 2 resurrections of Rev 20:5 are 1,000 years apart.

Where do you place the resurrection of the unsaved on the timeline of history?
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
13,739
5,542
113
I've been following the thread and understand that you see that, since the statement that, "the rest of the dead will not live again until the thousand years are finished,' precedes the statement, 'this is the first resurrection,' and that this does imply another resurrection. Likewise, the term 'second death' implies a first death, and I believe this occurs at Christ's advent when wrath is exacted, hence they live not again until the thousand years are finished.
To address your point that, once resurrected these are killed with fire from heaven, I believe this is reflective of how the beast and false profit are 'killed' and 'thrown into the lake of fire which, in the latter case is 'destroyed at the brightness of His Coming.'

I believe it is presumption that anyone (of us) will 'see' anyone else literally being 'thrown into the lake of fire,'' although scriptures does say angels are witness of it. But, then again, I realize this is probably not an traditional nor common understanding among scholars.
if you think of revelation , we read of a lamb with seven eyes that’s been slain , but we know it’s an image or figure representing Jesus who sent the Holy Spirit . We read of a giant beast rising up from the sea , with seven heads and ten horns but understand it’s a figure or image representing 18 kings some from johns past , one in johns present , and still 12 more which would later rise up.

we read descriptions of a vision John was shown but it always represents something else. Another beast that looks like a lamb but speaks as a dragon , the spirits of frogs coming out of certain mouths , locusts coming out of an abyss ect

my point is if the book of revelation is structured this way , why would the numbers then become literal measures of time ? And not themselves be representing something else ?

“But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
‭‭2 Peter‬ ‭3:8‬ ‭KJV‬‬

God isn’t on any particular time table , the measures of time in revelation should be in my opinion taken as the rest of it shows itself to be. A heavenly vision from Gods perspective.

I think revelation is one of those things where some take it literal others see the visions as coming from heavens perspective understanding it’s imagery to have deep meaning king but not be speaking from mans perspective , but form Gods.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,680
113
The Bible says there are 2 resurrections total; one for the saved and one for the unsaved.

Acts 24:15 - and I have the same hope in God as these men themselves have, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.

So the single resurrection of the saved is at the Second Advent, which is the FIRST of the 2 resurrections total.


That is not my view though.

Since Acts 24:15 says 1 resurrection each, the ONE resurrection for the saved occurs at the Second Advent (1 Cor 15:23, 2 Thess 2:1) and the ONE resurrection for the unsaved occurs for the GWT judgment. Bingo! No contradiction.


1 Cor 15:23 contradicts any resurrection that isn't "when He comes". And there is no such verse showing that Jesus will come back a 3rd time, since the 2 resurrections of Rev 20:5 are 1,000 years apart.

Where do you place the resurrection of the unsaved on the timeline of history?
Thanks for quoting those verses and I see how they can be interpreted that way. I thought like that too for a long time. The more I read the Bible the more my views tend to change.

As far as I can tell the resurrection of the unsaved is after Gog and Magog, immediately before or suddenly at the great white throne according to Revelation 20:11-15, especially verse 13.

13And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

They go straight dead to resurrected then immediately to judgement. No talk of a 1,000 years followed by a big war.

i
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
13,739
5,542
113
Oh no, please, it's nice and rare to hear some authentic testimony like this, very relatable, especially the loneliness part. I'm of the millennial generation, maybe not as experienced in life and seasoned with age as you are, but I've already felt what Paul said in Philippians 3:8, that all I've once thought gain and held dear are counted as loss.

2020 was a turning point is American and world history, but also a turning point for me. It was not just the PLANdemic and the shutdown, it was much more than that, there's this DEMONIC spirit of wokeness sweeping across the entire western hemisphere. Since then, everything I used to enjoy became an abomination, all these big businesses there were not much involved in politics before were all going woke, they all spoke in the same voice echoing the same agenda like the ten kings worshiping the Beast, meanwhile the quality of their products and contents sharply decliend. All these idols had just collapsed, I actually didn't want to leave them, I really wanna hang onto them as an escape, but they left me. They've lost their appeal to me. Before 2020 they were just spiritual junk food, now they were POISON. And in my hunger and thirst, the Holy Spirit pointed me to Jesus, the Bread of Life and Living Water.

For now I'm still deep in struggle with the temptation of backsliding everyday, especially in my most vulnerable moments when I'm stressed and sleepy, when my mind is like mush with my guard down. But now I can hear the Holy Spirit speaking in my heart, it's as faint as a whisper, barely audible, and yet it's so powerful that it convicts me of my sin and disciplines my behavior. For now it's just in the passive stage, that I'm still in the process of purging these idols from my heart while developing my relationship with God. And when I'm with the Holy Spirit, medidating on God's words and discussing them with others, time just flies away. Holy Spirit just magically shortens every long and hard day bringing me closer to God. Truly, a thousand years is like one day with the Lord. That's not just a prophetic statement, but also a spiritual experience.
yes I wish I hadn’t been so busy when I was younger , I could have done a lot more in the kingdom than an old man can.

your in a good position if you remain in the light of his word. There’s a lot in the world that’s constantly trying to pull us away from what’s established forever. Again I wish I would have known at twenty what I know now but I suppose the Lord has been there all along and has worked out any good and any knowledge I have learned now.

I just regret being so busy with earthly matters in my youth and prime , I wish I could have heard this way back then but am thankful I finally got the message even now

“If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.”
‭‭Colossians‬ ‭3:1-2‬ ‭KJV‬‬

I suppose God has a plan for each of us and a perfect time to open our eyes and ears it sounds like your in a great position right now to do some good work ahead for many years to come.

one thing I’ve learned is to not let the ideas of the world pull us from what Jesus eternal And unchanging words have spoken that’s where all the life is. It just took me many years to hear and see it.

the lord is good though he’s preparing us for eternal Life , and not in this world but after we pass away from it or it passes away all Together.

God bless and keep You in his immutable And unchanging light that purifies

“Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.”
‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭13:8‬ ‭KJV‬‬
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
Thanks for quoting those verses and I see how they can be interpreted that way. I thought like that too for a long time. The more I read the Bible the more my views tend to change.
You're welcome.

As far as I can tell the resurrection of the unsaved is after Gog and Magog, immediately before or suddenly at the great white throne according to Revelation 20:11-15, especially verse 13.
Exactly. That's why the "rest of the dead" refer to unbelievers. They are in the SECOND resurrection, for the GWT judgment.

13And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

They go straight dead to resurrected then immediately to judgement. No talk of a 1,000 years followed by a big war.
Wait a sec. While reading through Rev 20, we know it begins right after the Second Advent and then the Millennium, which is 1,000 years, and then the last battle on earth, Gog and Magog. Immediately followed by the GWT judgment.

So, the FIRST resurrection, which occurs just after the Second Advent, is followed by the SECOND resurrection, which occurs just after the battle of Gog and Magog. That is 1,000 years between the 2 resurrections.

So, to be clear, all the unsaved will be physically dead by the end of the battle of Gog and Magog. THEN their resurrection, immediately followed by the GWT judgment.

So the unsaved aren't resurrected until ALL the unsaved are dead, which occurs when that last battle on earth is finished.

Rev 20-
7 When the thousand years are over, Satan will be released from his prison
8 and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth—Gog and Magog—and to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the seashore.
9 They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of God’s people, the city he loves. But fire came down from heaven and devoured them.

I believe v.9 records when all the unsaved that are left on the planet are devoured, which ends the battle. And then the resurrection of all the unsaved, for the GWT judgment.
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,107
1,540
113
68
Brighton, MI
Man, I hate the term "Holy Ghost", definitely the worst translation of the entire KJV. Everytime I spot it I frown at it. Ghost is universally associated with dead people - even in the historical context of the bible itself. When Jesus appeared to His disciples in His resurrected body, doubting Thomas thought he was seeing things. And what things did he see? A Holy Ghost. In other words, a hullucination of a dead Jesus instead of the new body of a risen Jesus. KJV is true and faithful in every other way except this. It gives you the wrong impression that dead people's "ghosts" are out and about, seeking to reincarnate in new bodies. That's the core belief in Eastern mysticism, not Christianity.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20111019092740884
good point
 

TheLearner

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2019
8,107
1,540
113
68
Brighton, MI
Man, I hate the term "Holy Ghost", definitely the worst translation of the entire KJV. Everytime I spot it I frown at it. Ghost is universally associated with dead people - even in the historical context of the bible itself. When Jesus appeared to His disciples in His resurrected body, doubting Thomas thought he was seeing things. And what things did he see? A Holy Ghost. In other words, a hullucination of a dead Jesus instead of the new body of a risen Jesus. KJV is true and faithful in every other way except this. It gives you the wrong impression that dead people's "ghosts" are out and about, seeking to reincarnate in new bodies. That's the core belief in Eastern mysticism, not Christianity.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20111019092740884
good point
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,922
2,005
113
if you think of revelation , we read of a lamb with seven eyes that’s been slain , but we know it’s an image or figure representing Jesus who sent the Holy Spirit . We read of a giant beast rising up from the sea , with seven heads and ten horns but understand it’s a figure or image representing 18 kings some from johns past , one in johns present , and still 12 more which would later rise up.

we read descriptions of a vision John was shown but it always represents something else. Another beast that looks like a lamb but speaks as a dragon , the spirits of frogs coming out of certain mouths , locusts coming out of an abyss ect

my point is if the book of revelation is structured this way , why would the numbers then become literal measures of time ? And not themselves be representing something else ?

“But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.”
‭‭2 Peter‬ ‭3:8‬ ‭KJV‬‬

God isn’t on any particular time table , the measures of time in revelation should be in my opinion taken as the rest of it shows itself to be. A heavenly vision from Gods perspective.

I think revelation is one of those things where some take it literal others see the visions as coming from heavens perspective understanding it’s imagery to have deep meaning king but not be speaking from mans perspective , but form Gods.
I've often found a bit of comfort in that even with the visions given to Daniel, he personally found them perplexing himself.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,922
2,005
113
I’m not talking about any of us here. Actually we’re among the most serious Bible scholars in the world in my personal opinion, maybe even more so then students in seminary. Sure we disagree but we’re all in the Word daily sharpening our iron.
It has become evident to me that those whose thoughts I enjoy reading most are the hardest nuts to crack, figuratively speaking of course :p Iron indeed.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,922
2,005
113
My last few posts exposes the contradictions caused by making Revelation 20:5 a resurrection of unbelievers. Such as requiring multiple second resurrection groups and even a third death.
I don't know if I can explain clearly how multiple second resurrection groups or even a third death isn't required...but I will try to explain it in my view.

All (that are His, believers) will be raised to eternal life, if dead, or changed to incorruptible if remaining alive at the time of Jesus' return to establish His millennial reign. The millennial reign is a period wherein a man that dies 100 years old is considered a babe, so death isn't as prevalent but neither has it yet been cast into the lake forever. And the rest of the dead, that already had been dead or died at the time of His wrath, will not live again until the end of the millennium, before the GWT. That 100 year old 'babe' that died during the millennium (his first death since he either was graced to survive wrath or was born within the thousand years but had not put on incorruptible since he death does exhibit power over him). So unbelievers having already died or die during the millenium did so because they were not clothed with incorruptible, or in other words 'not indestructible' as are those of the 'first resurrection.' Everyone then, albeit may enjoy a longer life during the millennial but still, if they die, has only died once up to the point of the 'second resurrection' of unbelievers who are not resurrected until the end of the millennium at the GTW, which only then results in their second death.
 
Mar 4, 2020
8,614
3,680
113
I don't know if I can explain clearly how multiple second resurrection groups or even a third death isn't required...but I will try to explain it in my view.

All (that are His, believers) will be raised to eternal life, if dead, or changed to incorruptible if remaining alive at the time of Jesus' return to establish His millennial reign. The millennial reign is a period wherein a man that dies 100 years old is considered a babe, so death isn't as prevalent but neither has it yet been cast into the lake forever. And the rest of the dead, that already had been dead or died at the time of His wrath, will not live again until the end of the millennium, before the GWT. That 100 year old 'babe' that died during the millennium (his first death since he either was graced to survive wrath or was born within the thousand years but had not put on incorruptible since he death does exhibit power over him). So unbelievers having already died or die during the millenium did so because they were not clothed with incorruptible, or in other words 'not indestructible' as are those of the 'first resurrection.' Everyone then, albeit may enjoy a longer life during the millennial but still, if they die, has only died once up to the point of the 'second resurrection' of unbelievers who are not resurrected until the end of the millennium at the GTW, which only then results in their second death.
I agree with that. As long as resurrected righteous never die again I think we're good, like Luke 20:34-36 says. The unrighteous die a single bodily death then later face a second death. I also believe that the second death is complete and utter destruction of the human soul, but that's an entirely different discussion for another thread.

So in Revelation 21:4, is God talking about the death of the wicked being a problem from the righteous?
4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,922
2,005
113
So in Revelation 21:4, is God talking about the death of the wicked being a problem from the righteous?
4And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
The righteous have the mind of Christ, as exampled by Jesus' account of Lazarus' willingness to cross over the gulf to give the rich ruler water so most definitely, being Christ-like, they take no pleasure in the death of the wicked.