^ P.P.S. Since God went to great lengths (so to speak) to fill His Word with vast and meticulous details... I tend to believe that ALL of them *are* important... and many of them actually touch on this present Subject (of "rapture-timing"), impacting and affecting our "understanding" (as it should)
The False Teaching (& Truth) of what happens at the Rapture.
- Thread starter Marilyn
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
It is difficult to figure out what you are referring to.
What? You mean Christ ascended way back in Lev 23:10??? How does that work, exactly?
For the life of me, I do not understand why so many people quote or cite OT verses when explaining end times.
First, this verse doesn't support your presumption that Jesus left earth and came back down to earth "late that same evening".
Second, please include verses when claiming facts. How else will anyone believe you?
No, I'm saying that His RESURRECTION DAY when He said (to MM) "I ASCEND [active]" (and then DID SO, that VERY DAY)... that it was ON "FIRSTFRUIT" (the VERY day on the calendar that Lev23:10-12 is talking about)
Of course what IS in the Bible IS important.
My point was that details LEFT OUT are NOT important. At least, enough to have an argument over.
FreeGrace2 said:
What? You mean Christ ascended way back in Lev 23:10??? How does that work, exactly?
1 Cor 15:23 describes the resurrection of Jesus as "first fruit" BECAUSE He was the FIRST person to get a glorified body.
But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him.
Acts 26:23 - that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles.”
Not difficult at all.
What? You mean Christ ascended way back in Lev 23:10??? How does that work, exactly?
So what? What does it matter that Jesus told MM that He will ascend "on fristfruit"?
1 Cor 15:23 describes the resurrection of Jesus as "first fruit" BECAUSE He was the FIRST person to get a glorified body.
But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him.
Acts 26:23 - that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles.”
Not difficult at all.
Well, in past posts I put Gaebelein's Commentary on this passage... and I'm certain he's NOT THE ONLY ONE!!
I'm sure I've put it in threads on this topic, quoted out a LARGE SECTION of it for all to see (highlighting the pertinent points)... oh, yeah, I recall you only breeze past LENGTHY posts... so it's understandable that you've "never read of any"
(I see!)Coz He ASCENDED the VERY DAY of His RESURRECTION (on "FIRSTFRUIT" i.e. THAT DAY)... and then came back down later that same day (to the earth
), late in the day(yet, you are saying He ONLY EVER "comes to the earth" TWICE: His "FIRST advent" and His "SECOND advent" according to men's labels)
Popular rapture schemes are silly, unscriptural and unnecessary.
They are based on two wormy pillars. The first is they are nothing more than pandering to men desperate to have even the slightest chance to cheat death. The second and far more destructive is the out right dismissal of Christ's Lordship in history, some carry this nonsense to the point of setting the 'kingdom in abeyance' , Jesus is King today and there is nothing in heaven or earth that can add to His royalty, power or authority.
"know ye not that WE SHALL JUDGE ANGELS?" 1Cor6:3,[14]... some do not believe this will be the case.
(NOR believe that "Satan and his angels" will be "cast out UNTO THE EARTH" at the MID-point of the future Trib period, when there are "1260 days" yet remaining until Christ's Second Coming TO THE EARTH Rev19; Wonder what the "THRONES" are for, in Rev4-5??)
(NOR believe that "Satan and his angels" will be "cast out UNTO THE EARTH" at the MID-point of the future Trib period, when there are "1260 days" yet remaining until Christ's Second Coming TO THE EARTH Rev19; Wonder what the "THRONES" are for, in Rev4-5??)
^ Well, let me just say (for starters) that the word "resurrection" (which means "to stand again") should not be conflated with the word "glorification"...
IOW, when Acts 24:15 states that "there shall be resurrection... of the just and of the unjust"... it is NOT saying "glorification"
[for the readers (again): 1Cor15:23 says, "[re: resurrection] but EACH [a word that means 'OF MORE THAN TWO'] in his own ORDER / RANK" (which means there is an ORDER / RANK to it, and that there doesn't yet remain ONLY ONE, at ONE POINT IN TIME)... this requires us to seek out "understanding" of just what the passage is conveying...]
Are the "2W' shown "to stand again" (after having DIED)?? Yes! (At the "6th Trumpet [events] / 2nd Woe" at a time-slot completely DISTINCT!!)
IOW, when Acts 24:15 states that "there shall be resurrection... of the just and of the unjust"... it is NOT saying "glorification"
[for the readers (again): 1Cor15:23 says, "[re: resurrection] but EACH [a word that means 'OF MORE THAN TWO'] in his own ORDER / RANK" (which means there is an ORDER / RANK to it, and that there doesn't yet remain ONLY ONE, at ONE POINT IN TIME)... this requires us to seek out "understanding" of just what the passage is conveying...]
Are the "2W' shown "to stand again" (after having DIED)?? Yes! (At the "6th Trumpet [events] / 2nd Woe" at a time-slot completely DISTINCT!!)
You are wrong because at the resurrection is when people receive a glorified body.
Do you believe the "2W" will be resurrected (which means [/ is DEFINED as] "to stand again" after having physically DIED)? I do. Revelation 11:9,11
[and this is at the "6th Trumpet [events] / 2nd Woe"... at a time-slot completely DISTINCT from when ALL OTHERS will be! WHY?!?! And note: I've stated before that I see a difference in the texts stating "the resurrection" and simply "resurrection" (which latter use does not LIMIT it to ONE POINT IN TIME)--can you consider that Paul was given something TO DISLOSE which hadn't yet been up to that point??]
Jesus said (just before the Cross), "I have YET MANY THINGS to say unto you, BUT ye cannot bear them NOW; But WHEN..." (and those things were then RECORDED in SCRIPTURE *following* His Death/Resurrection... just like 1Cor2:10,16b says of them)
Hi Hitch,
However WHEN the Father sends Jesus to gather His Body, He then takes them to His own throne where He VISIBLY reigns with His Body. (Acts 3: 20 & 21, 1 Thess. 4: 13 - 17, Rev. 3: 21, Rev. 4: 1 - 4)
That is the appointed time for the restoration spoken by the old Testament Prophets, of restored visible rulership in the highest. (Ps. 110: 1& 2, Ps. 2: 6, Zech. 6: 13 etc)
Jesus claimed all the power and authority there is .
, of restored visible rulership in the highest I gather you cant quite accept His current position since you cant see Him , be assured His power is by no means limited by your sight.
10 The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
2 The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.
The last enemy is death, death is destroyed by resurrection ,not before. So I cant imagine why you cited this passage. Nothing in this Psalm requires His being visible.
Yes but this isn't what is being discussed. You deny there is a glorified body at the resurrection which is the resurrection after the 7th trump which excludes the 2W. We can discuss that later or in another thread but I want to focus on the one issue where you are clearly incorrect.
- Status