1 Peter 3:20-21
“...God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:”
I believe the water mentioned in 1 Peter 3:20-21 pertains to water baptism for the following reasons:
1.The water was the means God used to carry Noah and his family to safety. The sin of the world was washed away in the flood waters. The like figure or antitype is the NT water baptism. (Acts 2:38, 22:16)
2. Notice verse 21 makes specific mention of the process having nothing to do with the removal of filth from the flesh. (This is a reference to bath water) Thus, the comment points to a spiritual transaction taking place.
3. The scripture mentions that baptism is the answer of a good conscience toward God. Our own behavior, and in this particular case getting baptized, is what prompts a good conscience. The result is to be free of guilt. God is the giver of the Holy Ghost and we have no control over that other than asking for Him to give it.
4. Lastly, the scripture specifies this is only made possible by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Excellent article on Acts 22:16 - https://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/2015/03/acts-2216-baptism-essential-for.html
Remission of sins is signified, yet not procured in the waters of baptism. (Acts 10:43-47) The only logical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ implied in genuine repentance (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31; 26:18) *Perfect Harmony*Not so excellent; since it provides an alternate interpretation to that which is faithful and true; deterring people from taking the simple step that might procure for them remission of sins and the Holy Ghost (Acts 2:38-39).
Agreed.There is no reason why anyone should reject being baptized in Jesus' Name if given the opportunity...
Incorrect. You overlooked the word "Repent".Especially since baptism in Jesus' Name is the condition given for a conditional promise in holy scripture...the promise being remission of sins and the Holy Ghost (Acts 2:38-39).
Um, no, they are not "guaranteed" with baptism. Don't read your own ideas into Scripture.For even if these things can be procured apart from baptism in Jesus' Name, they are guaranteed with baptism in Jesus' Name and I do not see them guaranteed by any other method.
Um, no, they are not "guaranteed" with baptism. Don't read your own ideas into Scripture.
Yes, sometimes I do that. Point taken. I was focused on one aspect of it and did overlook one of the other aspects.Incorrect. You overlooked the word "Repent".
Further, the Gentiles in Acts 10 received the Holy Spirit before being baptized in water, which means your "conditional promise" is simply not valid in every case, therefore it is not a condition at all.
Phrase, 2nd person plural. -Act 2:38, Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Act 2:39, For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
It's not reasonable to take a single event (Acts 2), claim that is the "rule", and then say that a different single event is an exception and doesn't need to follow the rule. It's either a rule, or it isn't. I go with the latter.We have already discussed in this very thread the reality that in Acts 10 it was a transitional time in church history so that an exception to the rule of Acts 2:38-39 was made in order for Gentiles to be accepted into the body of Christ by the circumcision group.
Salvation has been the same since Adam.It's not reasonable to take a single event (Acts 2), claim that is the "rule", and then say that a different single event is an exception and doesn't need to follow the rule. It's either a rule, or it isn't. I go with the latter.
False teaching.In Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. This is exactly what Acts 3:19 teaches except that Peter omits the parenthesis.
*Also compare the fact that these Gentiles in Acts 10:45 received the gift of the Holy Spirit (compare with Acts 2:38 - the gift of the Holy Spirit) and this was BEFORE water baptism. (Acts 10:47)
In Acts 10:43 we read ..whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins. Again, these Gentiles received the gift of the Holy Spirit - Acts 10:45 - when they believed on the Lord Jesus Christ - Acts 11:17 - (compare with Acts 16:31 - Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved) BEFORE water baptism - Acts 10:47. This is referred to as repentance unto life - Acts 11:18.
*So the only logical conclusion when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ implied in genuine repentance (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31; 26:18) *Perfect Harmony*
"every one of you" is obviously referring to the whole group!Let every one of You be baptized - 3rd person singular - You being singular. Not spoken to the whole group. but spoken to a select group of people. Who are these people?