It will probably get banned about the same time that atrocious spelling is banned.
DON'T BE PICKLING ON MEZZZZ
It will probably get banned about the same time that atrocious spelling is banned.
OSAS is one of those ingrained traditions that will never get uprooted; it's too much a part of Americanity. You just have to accept it.
I kind of feel sorry for those who only know one way to spell a word.
I disagree with some of the posts and responses. I'm not backward in saying so either. However, I believe most people simply lack knowledge. Others seem to have trouble expressing what they really mean. I don't know if English is not your first language, but I sometimes find it hard to follow your logic.many times it's been said, I'm not wasting my time getting annoyed and collecting all the comments which suggest Jesus works with evil, but I tell you what give me a couple of weeks and I will have hundreds if you want.
When Satan oppresses Christians he also tempts people into sin or tests people into sin , which are both the same thing. And when a Christian says God has granted Satan permission to oppress christians then your also saying God is tempting you into sin, because Satan will always tempt people into sin in every passage he appears in, he is tempting people into sin in the Bible, that is his track record. then that Christian is saying God is tempting people into sin by saying God allows and grants Satan permission to oppress Christians.
Or the argument that Satan is the tester the chosen accuser of God people or an instrument used by God
All crop up nearly everyday. Or the twisted ideology that God granted Satan authority to get Job to cause Job to sin and blame God, and then use that as authentication to say God allows Satan to do the same to christians, or the twisted ideology that the holy spirited granted Satan permission to tempt Jesus into sinning.
OR the Satan glorifiers who come here everyday glorifying Satan with the rapture believing the lie that Satan will be allowed to oppress Christians in the end days. Or that Satan will be given permission by God to be the God of this world.
Or the endless fantasies of God allowing hardship or war or disease or pain and suffering. Blood shed .
OR innocent blood being shed, or the endless law unto him self person with a cocky attitude forcing there doctrines in s legalistic way, especially the doctrines mentioned in this op
or the endless fantasies of indoctrinated people playing God.
THere you have everyday day Satan is glorified and best of all by Christian saying it's on the authority of God.
and many Christian everyday being tempted into sin here by believing the lies of the most evil doctrines ever to grace are lands. unchecked and just dismissed as not happening now.
WOw I wonder what's next so far I'm a lier for exposing the truth a supporter of Calvinism, a Satan glorifier a person with no mind. A person making story's up. A false teacher. A disturbed person.
honestly you don't see along with others how this website is used to glorify Satan but I do, I'm sickened by all this, really I will. Have to leave for a couple of months again and hope that this doctrine is banned by time I get back, because Im struggling to deal with the pain it's causing me.
or maybe I will find away with the help of God to truly expose this doctrine when I come back that is just going untouched. By copying every time Satan is glorified from now on. Which I would rather not.
There is just as much scripture to support OSAS as to contradict it. If Christians would take the time to study what the Word really says about salvation, the apparent contradiction would evaporate. There is no contradiction. The problem is the definition of salvation, which is misconstrued by many.IMO, we should not "just accept it." Flawed Theology should be challenged and argued. Elsewise, many, many sincere believers (mostly new believers) will be led down a path dark with pitfalls abounding.........
NOW.....
IF the OSAS'ers wanna change their "mantra" to Once Sanctified, Always Sanctified, then I could force myself to agree. However the oncesavedalwayssaved mantra is even refuted by Jesus Himself, as has been shown in many, many thousands of comments here on CC.
There is just as much scripture to support OSAS as to contradict it. If Christians would take the time to study what the Word really says about salvation, the apparent contradiction would evaporate. There is no contradiction. The problem is the definition of salvation, which is misconstrued by many.
You do not know what sanctification is. It is in fact a gift from God and it is a person,
Well you would be wrong. How can eternal life not be eternal? How can indestructible be destroyed? How can born again of the Spirit of God die? Lord Jesus was talking about the salvation of the soul (the second salvation) at times and being born again (the first salvation) at other times. They are not the same thing.The Scriptures you speak of DO support Once Sanctified, Always Sanctified, but I disagree they support the OSAS ideology. Jesus Himself spoke against OSAS.....that is all I need to believe it is flawed theology.![]()
Touchy, aren't we. Which part of "Jesus is our sanctification" did I get wrong?I certainly DO know what Sanctification is. Sanctification is when a believer receives the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit.
The Apostle spoke of the carnal "earthly" believer. Those new believers not yet able to feast on the meat of the Word. He also spoke of "spiritual" believers. Those who have matured in their life walk with Jesus, and have received the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit. Thus becoming able to FEAST on the meat of the Word of God with "spiritual understanding" of Scripture. No longer bound to just earthly/physical understanding as are new believers not yet sanctified by the Holy Spirit.
Believe as you wish. Fine with me. It is your right. However, do not pretend to "school" me on the understanding of Scripture. You can certaily state "your opinion" on Scripture; but you have NOT been appointed as the "single source" of Scriptural interpretation.
Well you would be wrong. How can eternal life not be eternal? How can indestructible be destroyed? How can born again of the Spirit of God die? Lord Jesus was talking about the salvation of the soul (the second salvation) at times and being born again (the first salvation) at other times. They are not the same thing.
I see you do not understand the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, and what it does. Do you even believe in that indwelling presence? Do you believe in the Holy Trinity?
I am left wondering...........
Again, unless you have the Letter of Authority signed by the Lord God appointing YOU as the Singular Authority on all things Scriptural, I suggest you refrain from declaring who is wrong and/or who is right. To do so simply reveals your ignorance of Scriptural understanding as it deals with the Holy Spirit.
I certainly DO know what Sanctification is. Sanctification is when a believer receives the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit.
The Apostle spoke of the carnal "earthly" believer. Those new believers not yet able to feast on the meat of the Word. He also spoke of "spiritual" believers. Those who have matured in their life walk with Jesus, and have received the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit. Thus becoming able to FEAST on the meat of the Word of God with "spiritual understanding" of Scripture. No longer bound to just earthly/physical understanding as are new believers not yet sanctified by the Holy Spirit.
Believe as you wish. Fine with me. It is your right. However, do not pretend to "school" me on the understanding of Scripture. You can certaily state "your opinion" on Scripture; but you have NOT been appointed as the "single source" of Scriptural interpretation.
The subject is not the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is a Person, not "it". I do believe that the Holy Spirit indwells believers. I believe the Bible. It says that Jesus is God, the Holy Spirit is God and the Father is God. People are free to correct me if they believe that I am saying something contrary to God's word. I will do likewise. Feel free to ignore me if you have an issue with that.
I have an issue with people calling OSAS an evil doctrine when it is justifiable from God's word. That's the problem with turning God's word into a set of doctrines. Nothing should be taken out of context or in isolation. OSAS cannot be used to excuse sin, for example. That was one of the objections raised. If people love to sin, I seriously doubt the reality of there supposed born again experience.
Ok so I have to go with the idea and notion that free will should always favour a doctrine you can't agree upon, in your decision making for the right to choose on whether you should become offended, ?.I see, But even so banning it seems a bit extreme if we banned every doctrine we disagreed with there would be none to discuss. There is always going to be doctrines you will come across that you will disagree with or that you may even be offended by that doesn't mean it is required to be banned though, I could ask that the sinless perfection doctrine be banned or that the doctrine of salvation by predestination be banned making it where only certain chosen people were predestined to be saved while others were predstined to be damned to hell be banned because I fisagree with those doctrines but it is peoples right to believe what they want to believe and speak what they wish to speak at least here in America. Besides it doesn't affect me any if they speak on these things if I don't allow it to it requires maturity to not only speak about such things but to hear of them to, I understand you don't want to see or hear about the things you have but you have to understand there are many kinds of believers out there with many kinds of beliefs not all will tickle your ears some may offend them that doesn't mean you need to ban their speech it just means you need to learn to take it in stride.
It is just as well that only you have come up with this bizarre idea -- "the root of all bad doctrines". Even God and Christ have not said anything about banning this so-called "doctrine".And I don't call call for doctrines to be banned, just the root doctrines of all bad doctrines , which I believe the one I am calling for to be banned, is.
that's ok you have free will to choose the worst bad doctrines here in cc, but also I would point out you may be a Calvinist for saying as much, I have done my research and it seems for every bad doctrin , behind the service if you look Satan is leading a person into sin. And everytime it's not noticed. Just like your blindness to.It is just as well that only you have come up with this bizarre idea -- "the root of all bad doctrines". Even God and Christ have not said anything about banning this so-called "doctrine".