FreeGrace2 said:
OK, point to the person who has EVER satisfied all requirements perfectly. Jesus excluded.
Mine as well.
Nevertheless, the law is still the law. It is in effect regardless of the person's ability to meet it.
And you are missing the point.
Those not saved by Christ will be held responsible for meeting its requirements. The law just doesn't go away.
No. Jesus Christ paid the sin debt for all of humanity, even though calvinists do not believe that. He died for everyone.
FreeGrace2 said:
You are in serious need of a lexicon. Tasso is not in the least related to election.
Look how the word is USED in the examples I provided. They exactly match use and intent across the board.
Not even close. Tasso is NEVER used to convey election.
Here is how Luke used 'tasso' in ALL of his uses of it.
“tasso” is found in the following verses, with the various translations:
Matt 28:16 “appointed” ASV, KJV “told to go” NIV “designated” NASB
Jesus told the disciples where to go
Luke 7:8 “under authority” NIV “placed under authority” NASV, NKJV “set under” ASV, KJV
Centurion explaining to Jesus he was a man under authority
Acts 13:48 “appointed” NASB, NIV, NKJV “ordained” KJV, ASV
Believing Gentiles being compared to unbelieving Jews: Jews unworthy, Gentiles devoted
Acts 15:2 “appointed” NIV, ASV “determined” NKJV, NASB, KJV
Paul and Barnabas appointed to go to Jerusalem
Acts 22:10 “assigned” NIV “appointed” NKJV, KJV, NASB, ASV
Paul relating Jesus telling him on Damascus road to go to Damascus and be told his assignment
Acts 28:23 “arranged” NIV “appointed” ASV, KJV, NKJV “set” NASB
People arranged to meet with Paul on a certain day to hear him explain the gospel
Rom 13:1 “established” NIV, NASB “appointed” NKJV “ordained” KJV, ASV
God has established all authorities
1 Cor 16:15 “devoted” NASB, NKJV, NIV “addicted” KJV “set” ASV
Household of Stephanas, first converts in Achaia, devoted themselves to the service of the saints
Only Rom 13:1 and Acts 22:10 connote a theological “appointing” by God
It means "repeat". I was referring to my response to the sentence above.
Shoots down your theory that anyone is able to do "good" spiritually speaking, at least not from God's perspective. So, "conscience" is irrelevant since natural man is incapable of grasping/following/achieving the Gospel of himself
Wow. So you really think one's conscience is irrelevant? Go ahead. But God gave a conscience to everyone so that everyone would be able to discern right from wrong. If you think that's irrelevant, you really shouldn't be opining on a Christian forum.
Yeah, well sources outside the Bible are not to be relied upon as the verses I provided dictate. Are you afraid of the Bible?
The verses yoou provided "dictate"??? Just what do they "dictate" anyway?
More like what you are trying to dictate. Which I reject because the Bible doesn't support your "dictates".