5. Shadrach-Meshach-Abednego, did not Escape the Furnace and had to be tossed into it.
...and WHERE was Daniel at that time? (just sayin'...
5. Shadrach-Meshach-Abednego, did not Escape the Furnace and had to be tossed into it.
Nowhere, do we see where God removed His People from Earth to avoid Tribulation.
1. Noah, had to build an Ark and board the Ark, God [did not miraculously remove Noah from the Flood] but made him go through it
2. Lot, God did not Miraculously remove Him, Lot was given specific Orders he had to Obey to survive
3. God made Moses face Pharaoh and go through the Same Plagues as Egypt
4. Isaiah, did not escape being cut into half
5. Shadrach-Meshach-Abednego, did not Escape the Furnace and had to be tossed into it.
6. Daniel, had to face the Lions
7. The Apostles, did not escape torture and horrendous death [except one because he Received the Apocalypse]
So, why do us GENTILES, who are Grafted into the Fold, believe we will escape?
Denial, is why!
NO problem, I like your response and I appreciate it.Yes, I do know this.
And I've addressed that very thing in many past posts:
[briefly here]
1) vv.2-3 = the 70ad events (like JESUS said in the other Olivet Discourse accounts, ALSO in Matt22:7, ALSO in Lk21:12-24a [which is where the response to THIS Q (re: "these things") is RECORDED], ALSO in Luke 19:42-44-what He said on the VERY DAY that the "69 Weeks" were CONCLUDED, ON Palm Sunday, WHEN He DID the Zech9:9 thing and SAID the Lk19:42-44 thing... both covering the SUBJECT of "the city / Jerusalem"... the Subect ALSO of the "70 WEEKS" prophecy in Dan9:24-27 which is said to be [the time-prophecy] "DETERMINED UPON thy [Daniel] people AND UPON thy [Daniel's] holy city"... the very thing that prophecy is about);
2) "and of thy coming" (every reference in this Olivet Discourse, TO THAT "coming," refers to His Second Coming TO THE EARTH" = "Son of man cometh / coming / shall come / etc" refers to His Second Coming TO THE EARTH designation, to judge [/govern] and TO REIGN (not to "our Rapture");
3) "and of the END [SINGULAR] of the AGE [SINGULAR]"... which I pointed out was a Q BASED ON what He had ALREADY SPOKEN to them about in Matt13:24,30,39,40,49-50 re: "the END [SINGULAR] of the AGE [SINGULAR]" when the ANGELS will "REAP" (gather OUT all things that OFFEND... "collect ye FIRST the TARES"... which is the OPPOSITE SEQUENCE from that of "our Rapture" event!);
Jesus had already told them of "the AGE [SINGULAR] TO COME" which they CORRECTLY *understood* to be what WE NOW call the earthly MK age (1000 yrs) they'd been promised[!];
At the time Jesus spoke His Olivet Discourse, He had NOT YET spoken ANYTHING re: "our Rapture [IN THE AIR]"...
...His Subject in and throughout His Olivet Discourse (BESIDES the 12 or so verses in Lk21:12-24a_, covering "the 70ad events," which verse 12 states must come "BEFORE ALL" the beginning of BPs [which are "Matt24:4-8 / Mk13:5-8 / Lk21:8-11" SAME EVENTS!-"the BoBPs"... but v.12 is saying the 70ad events must come BEFORE THOSE!]);
So YES, Jesus ANSWERS *THIS* question TOO...
Thus He answers ALL THREE QUESTIONS
(it is the "70ad events" [under pt. 1 above ^ ] which are RECORDED in Lk21:12-24a,b ALONE [in the Olivet Discourse, not that He doesn't cover it elsewhere ALSO, as I showed]... Everything ELSE in the Olivet Discourse is what STARTS WITH "THE BEGINNING of BIRTH PANGS" [kicking off that future time-period] which are EQUIVALENT to the SEALS, which Rev1:1 / 4:1 / 1:19c says are "things which MUST COME TO PASS IN QUICKNESS [NOUN]" (same phrase used in Lk18:8 "AVENGE in quickness [noun]" and in Rom16:20 "shall CRUSH Satan UNDER YOUR FEET in quickness [noun]"(not slated YET to have take place)... NOT unfold over the course of some 2000 years, as the "Historicits" suggest of the Book of Rev).
I've presented my case. May the readers judge.
You are free to believe as you see it.
[didn't mean to BOLD so much of this... OOPS!]
You do realize that seven versions of the Bible that predate the 1611 KJV simply state "THE Departure"? Correct?
1)vv.2-3= the 70ad events (like JESUS said in the other Olivet Discourse accounts
NO problem, I like your response and I appreciate it.
Thank you ,
CS1
Evidently, the NAB is a Roman Catholic translation. Are you a RC?Considering the Translators of the KJV Bible admitted they were not familiar with Koine Greek, but Classical, they literally Hellenized the KJV New Testament. So, it pays to search the closest thing to Koine Greek Translation and I did.
Yes and no.Yes, it is still a religious departure ie: Apostasy.
You do realize that seven versions of the Bible that predate the 1611 KJV are based on manuscripts that have the Greek word Apostasia which means Apostasy?
Subect
"Historicits"
The Church is no longer on the earth by Rev 4:1.....I disagree Matthew chapter 24 covers three things asked of Jesus by the disciples, THree.
Mathre 24:3
3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying,
- “Tell us, when will these things be? And
- what will be the sign of Your coming,
- and of the end of the age?”
Jesus answered them all and you must also take what Jesus said in Mark and Luke on this topic too. I am not going to go into it again as I am not trying to have you agree with me I can careless. Just know insulting those you disagree with or calling them false will not help your cause. I'm sure you did not know Jesus was asked this three qestion in Matthew chapter 24, because if you did then you would know the context of all that he said. Jesus spoke of the present, the soon coming, and the future event leading to the end of the age.
I am done with you too. Please continue to scoff
![]()
The Church is no longer on the earth by Rev 4:1.....
"Come up here....."
What's to Answer?Those who hold to no pretrib Rapture have not answered about those who were dead prior to the coming of the Lord. Paul is doing just that. in 1Thess chapter 4 & 1cor 15:50-58
The Church is no longer on the earth by Rev 4:1.....
"Come up here....."
Heaven_Bound, post:
Prove me Wrong!
1. Had Lot looked back and disobeyed, he would be like his wife and not Saved. So, he was Saved by Obedience, not by being removed by the Power of God.
2. Noah would not had survived had he not Obeyed God and built the Ark and then entered the Ark. But he STILL HAD TO GO THROUGH THE RAIN, THE EFFECTS OF THE RAIN AND POWER OF THE WATER, AND HE HAD TO REMAIN INSIDE THE ARK UNTIL LAND APPEARED. Had he not Obeyed, he would have died.
Both Examples God [[did not Remove them from Destruction]], they had to OBEY GOD to survive.
If God made both Lot and Noah OBEY Specific Orders and [DID NOT] Miraculously remove them from harms way, why would there be a Secret, NON BIBLICAL Coming, before the Second Coming?
Ok. Play it out.I changed nothing, that is the actual Translation.
...yes we " discussed" it.You and i have already discussed this.
1. Had Lot looked back and disobeyed, he would be like his wife and not Saved. So, he was Saved by Obedience, not by being removed by the Power of God.
2. Noah would not had survived had he not Obeyed God and built the Ark. But he STILL HAD TO GO THROUGH THE RAIN, THE EFFECTS OF THE RAIN AND POWER OF THE WATER, AND HE HAD TO REMAIN INSIDE THE ARK UNTIL LAND APPEARED. Had he not Obeyed, he would have died.
Both Examples God [[did not Remove them from Destruction]], they had to OBEY GOD to survive.
YOU POSTRIBBERS CAN NOT SEE THAT?????Ok. Play it out.
Postribs position is the rapture at the white horses.
Psssst....they never see heaven.
You know, where your " superior translation" places them.
Too funny!!!!!