There is nothing wrong with being passionate brother. But at risk of seeming somewhat pedantic would you passionately tell me
what a Charismatic Pentecostal Minister is?
The reason I ask is because they are two distinct terms. I can't believe that you are using the term charismatic linguistically as you outlined in your Greek parse @
#251. If you are then that seems redundant because everyone knows that the Pentecostal movement came into sight by expressly experiencing the power of the Holy Spirit with tongues being a sign gift of the Spirit.
Why would you need to prepositionally append a descriptive term other than as an appellative? If an appellative - then a formal ministry with recognisable origins. Which is where the term pentecostal arises when used to describe a Pentecostal Minister.
I only think it matters because the term charismatic in isolation (say by saying that a brother is charismatic) could be linguistically defined in the Greek parse for anyone who didn't know what that term means - whereas it could also be an appellative term to denote a Charismatic Minister in a formal church environment - yet confusingly as a claim to being a Pentecostal Minister in a Pentecostal church such as the AOG or the Elim. The Charismatic Church is a movement that can be dated to its origins - in rather the same way the Pentecostal Church can. Just not at the same period of history. Two different events and two different effects.
I genuinely think that it may help those who are troubled by the excesses of the charismatic church movement to know how these terms arise. If so then using the term
Charismatic Pentecostal Minister does seem important. I guess you write like an old fashioned pentecostal - but feel a need to stress the charismatic - when pentecostal means essentially the same thing - unless as the link that the sister posted - to which link your disagreed with my comment - @
#214 and again @
#245 was in fact making a singular point. Being tongues - whilst it may exist in the precise meaning of the day of Pentecost when the hearers heard their own language being spoken - and not ecstatic utterances - seems to be set into that link of many proofs of the use of tongues in the churches through the ages of the church. And the flashing label citing Charismatic seems to make that clear. Perhaps that is the reason why some believers have taken to emphasising both the pentecostal meaning in Acts 2 and the ecstatic utterance meaning of Corinthians. I think that is what some opposers have been saying in this OP. But they are then told that they are poor men and need to fear God because they are in opposition to the Holy Spirit.
Then if you read the thread entirely what we can see is another effect. When prophetic ejaculations are cited along with declarative certainty amounting to prophecy - when the gift of prophecy is a rather different thing if defined biblically. Else it may be a word of knowledge - amounting to the same precept of prophetic insight and discernment or a word of wisdom having the same effect - how will we measure that in the local church - how do you measure that? Then when we come to the gifts of men to the church in Ephesians 4 it may become false prophets, false pastors and false apostles. The problem may be much more than a mere fact of brethren barking like dogs and crowing like cockerels or roaring like lions and being led about on dogs' leads and laughing uncontrollably. It may be a more pressing meaning than a fact of decency and order - and it may be the very semblance of what ministry really is and how numbers of millions of believers have fallen into charismatic madness in full sight of the whole church by men and women who call themselves apostles, prophets, evangelist and pastors and teachers. They didn't come as good;es did they brother. They came as named ministries and outward evidence of their power.
So I wanted to post this audio video of less than nine minutes. This is a Calvinist community which I belong to and I ministered with Donald MacPhail who is named in this narrative of Duncan Campbell who was the chief Minister in that Hebridean Revival. In this case this is a meeting on the Island of Berneray. It is truly exceptional because this kind of outworking of God took place across the entire Outer and Inner Hebrides and many thousands of people were saved - of which more than 70% of those saved didn't hear a word of prayer or even the gospel. Imagine that brother. The very end of the video speaks about a village five miles from the church and not a single household was unaffected - simultaneous to that outpouring of God's power in the baptism of fire in the church. People put into trances and not simply one person in a few pews but every single person in the entirety of the pews on one side of the church. On the others side of the church every single person cast about like skittles. Well that's revival isn't it brother. But what is it when it comes into a church and the people who are exercised in the same way are already believers? I think the problem of using labels to describe ourselves when we are determined to emphasis the power of the Holy Spirit by speaking of the gift of tongues - is a mistaken claim and is in itself divisive.
Still that's just me. I'm off to bed brother. Shalom