See Acts 22:16.with a proper understanding of the symbolism and the fact that while we should be baptized, this does not wash away our sins.
See Acts 22:16.with a proper understanding of the symbolism and the fact that while we should be baptized, this does not wash away our sins.
I find that Oneness Pentecostals believe very strongly.Oneness does not want to believe
If my claims about the Trinity are unbiblical, why then has no one been able to prove that they are unbiblical up to this point?
Am I to understand that this is the belief of an entire denomination?Water baptism does have the power to save
No, but you do need scripture to ascertain the purpose of water baptism. Fortunately Mark 1:4 and Luke 3:3 directly state that purpose. (no matter how much anyone detests that purpose)We don't need Scriptural evidence to ascertain that the sky is blue,...
it is a work ... you are transforming it into a work of righteousness. i.e. something we must do to be saved .... very wrong and disproved by scripture and 2, 000 years of church history.There is no effort involved in submitting to water baptism in Jesus' Name...therefore it is not a work.
John the Baptist said "I baptise with water but One is coming after me who is greater than I who baptises with fire and the Holy Ghost"No, but you do need scripture to ascertain the purpose of water baptism. Fortunately Mark 1:4 and Luke 3:3 directly state that purpose. (no matter how much anyone detests that purpose)
"John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins." - Mark 1:4 KJV
"And he came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins;" - Luke 3:3 KJV
If the bible states that baptism is for the remission of sins (which it does), and someone else says baptism is just an outward show, we both know we are supposed to trust the biblical statement, not the statement of man.
Love in Jesus to all who hear,
Kelby
Receiving the Holy Ghost is a different thing than receiving remission of sins. We need both. We need to be born of water and to be born of the Spirit. Baptized in water (which a man sent of God does) and baptized in the Holy Ghost (which only Jesus does).John the Baptist said "I baptise with water but One is coming after me who is greater than I who baptises with fire and the Holy Ghost"
this is the truth of the matter.
Hi bro.Receiving the Holy Ghost is a different thing than receiving remission of sins. We need both. We need to be born of water and to be born of the Spirit. Baptized in water (which a man sent of God does) and baptized in the Holy Ghost (which only Jesus does).
Love in Jesus,
Kelby
See article on Acts 22:16 - https://kentbrandenburg.blogspot.com/2015/03/acts-2216-baptism-essential-for.htmlSee Acts 22:16.
In Matthew 3:11, we read - "I baptize you with water for repentance.. (NASB) Now was this baptism for "in order to obtain" repentance? (which makes no sense at all) or was this baptism for "in regards to/on the basis of" repentance? Obviously the latter. So water baptism does not obtain repentance or the remission of sins, but is done "in regards to/on the basis of" remission of sins received upon repentance. It's the same in Mark 1:4 and Luke 3:3. John the Baptist preached a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. This baptism was for "in regards to/on the basis of" remission of sins received upon repentance.John the Baptist said "I baptise with water but One is coming after me who is greater than I who baptises with fire and the Holy Ghost"
this is the truth of the matter.
That's because different people are sent to different tasks. Paul also wasn't sent to the Jews...but I'm guessing you know it was still necessary for the Jews to have someone sent to them. It was just Peter rather than Paul.Hi bro.
And yet Paul says "God did not send me to baptize..." what aBOUT that? didn't send Paul to baptize and yet folks are claiming baptism in water is essential to salvation.
There is no peril in believing the Word.That is an alternate interpretation, that you choose to believe at your own peril.
Ridiculous. They HAVE been, but you keep your eyes closed so as to not see them.If my claims about the Trinity are unbiblical, why then has no one been able to prove that they are unbiblical up to this point?
None of these verses say that. Every verse that mentions that baptism saves is referring to the baptism of the Holy Spirit, which is the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. It's all been explained to you, but your eyes are closed to truth.Water baptism does have the power to save (Acts 2:38-39, Romans 6:1-4, Galatians 3:27, Colossians 2:11-15, 1 Peter 3:20-21; Ezekiel 36:25-27).
Yes, and a symbol. No symbol saves. Only Jesus saves. He saves by giving the gift of etenal life (John 5:24 and 10:28). And God the Father gives the sealing ministry of the Holy Spirit (Eph 1:13,14).Is not water baptism an identification with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection?
Don't conflate verses. It is a public acknowledgement of the FACT that the one being baptized identifies with Christ.And therefore, does it not amount to confessing Jesus before men?
No, it is not. It is a figure of speech that relates to future eternal blessings/reward. Those believers who don't confess Jesus before men will not be rewarded in heaven.Will not Jesus confess us before the holy angels and the Father as the result (Matthew 10:32, Luke 12:8)?
Is that not salvation?
Please stop making up lies. I HAVE dealt with that verse and I've explained it to you multiple times.Just keep on ignoring Acts 2:39...
That is the FACT, which you aren't interested it.You think that you understand these verses in your assertion that the promise in question was given only to those who saw Jesus' miracles.
There were Gentiles in that crowd, no doubt.But Acts 2:39 is clear that there were those who were afar off who would be recipients of that promise...
Because Acts 2:38 didn't apply to them. They heard the gospel from Peter, believed it.And even if that is referring to Gentiles, as you purport, I think that you need to realize that Cornelius and friends (and other Gentiles who would recreive baptism in Jesus' Name later) were not among those who originally saw Jesus perform His miracles.
And that refutes your whole theory.Paul wasn't sent to baptize, that is true
Correct. Nope, it doesn't.Nope.
They believe very strongly in false doctrine. All religions do that.I find that Oneness Pentecostals believe very strongly.
This is physical birth and spiritual birth. Has NOTHING to do with water baptism.We need to be born of water and to be born of the Spirit.
Rejection is to refuse what scripture actually states occurs in obedience to God's command to be water baptized. Without acceptance of the core principle that God chose to establish water baptism as the means for remitting a believer's personal sin in association with Jesus' sacrifice it is impossible to understand other scriptures relevant to a topic.so again you are outright rejecting scripture that shows your error of Oneness and baptism?
so be it then
'your argument is not with anyone here