Psalm 11:5Yeah, God does love everyone. It's just that not everyone will love him back.
King James Version
5 The Lord trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth.
Psalm 11:5Yeah, God does love everyone. It's just that not everyone will love him back.
Psalm 11:5
King James Version
5 The Lord trieth the righteous: but the wicked and him that loveth violence his soul hateth.
Ummmm.... What do you believe Jesus said?Are we going to base our doctrine on one of David's imprecatory Psalms, or are we going to focus on what Jesus said??
I am tempted to question what your true agenda is.
We know the truth. No need to phart around with The Word of God.
For God so loved "The World..."
God has absolute love for His creation, and absolute love for what He knows His creation is capable of. However, God can't love those who deny Him and refuse to repent.
Ummmm.... What do you believe Jesus said?
Does God love everyone?
He said He did...
John
3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Then... What's the point of judgment?
Recently I had listened to an older video of R.C. Sproul and a lecture he had given on this topic. Is it Biblical to tell all people that God loves them? In R.C.’s conclusion, the answer would be yes and no. He breaks down this notion of divine love into three parts:
Benevolent: God’s good will towards His creation
Beneficence: God shows provision for people by giving things that we all benefit from in order to survive
Complacency: This not to be confused with how the word is used today, but instead it is the love the Father has for the Son and to those who have been given to Him (The Elect)
I do think this is accurate assessment given what scripture has revealed to us. I just want to get other Believer’s opinion of the matter. Is R.C. missing the mark on this one? Is he correct? Please let me know
(Also, this not an in-depth analysis of the topic, but rather a summary of what he did allude to)