Right. Verse 1 is speaking of one thing (one point in time);
however, v.8b is speaking of a completely distinct point in time from that of verse 1.
however, v.8b is speaking of a completely distinct point in time from that of verse 1.
You are the only pretribber that denies the second coming is scriptural.
He's just getting frustrated explaining his points and no one is trying to understand. The answer to many of the questions directed to him, he has already shown, but it seems the same questions keep coming back. It's frustrating! I know how he feels.
So give him some slack, it's only human to react this way after all the arguments.
Who are you guys?You guys need it to say that a wicked person with the mark of the beast, a satan worshipper,is in bed with a born again, saved believer.
Aren't you glad it said "2 will be in a bed, one taken, one left".
That ONLY FITS pretrib rapture.
"Before the flood"
Before judgement.
2 christians in a bed, one taken, one left.
I think we've discussed this before not sure, though.You guys need a postrib example.
A postrib gathering of the church with an immediate uturn.
Lot= nope
Noah=nope
One taken= nope
10 virgins= nope.
No, my dear brother Gary. I cannot let you get away with that incredible cornfuzz. I have never said anyone had to agree with me 100% on everything to get through the Gates.Let me guess --- what makes a saint "ready" is if he/she believes in a pre-trib rapture ["at the 'appointed' time"]...?
Which means he/she is a [born-again] saint the moment he/she believes in a pre-trib rapture.
All others cannot be a [born-again] saint unless-and-until they loose-their-head.
Is that what you are saying?
It sure seems like that is what you are saying.
Garsh - and I thought you became a [born-again] saint when you placed your full belief, faith, and trust in the Almighty Creator and His only begotten Son Jesus.
You mean - you have to believe in a pre-trib rapture to be saved???
![]()
Really Charlie? If he's frustrated with others it is not okay to take it out on me.
Christians shouldn't behave like the world when they are frustrated--you all get frustrated because you think you're right and if only the other side would 'see the light!' Well did you ever consider that we feel the exact same way? I can't count how many times I've got responses where it was obvious they hadn't even read what I wrote--they've decided my beliefs are xyz even though I keep saying no--they are Abc, ABc ABC!![]()
No, my dear brother Gary. I cannot let you get away with that incredible cornfuzz. I have never said anyone had to agree with me 100% on everything to get through the Gates.
Let us take this time to see if we cannot all say a little prayer together...
Matthew
6:9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
6:10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as [it is] in heaven.
6:11 Give us this day our daily bread.
6:12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
6:13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
If you can pray that with me, then I'm a happy oyster.
that came out of nowhere.
Prove it.
You made the accusation.
Back it up
All I'm saying is that this phrase "SECOND coming" is not found in Scripture itself, but is a man-supplied label to help aid in our discussions
Who are you guys?
I don't need it to say anything. I'm just trying to look at the scriptures honestly and do as Jesus said watch and be ready and be prepared to endure until the end.
Sounds like you're the one that needs it to say something...you're the one looking for an easy way out.
I think we've discussed this before not sure, though.
There was no secret rapture for Lot or Noah. God had already made his judgement and his judgement was already coming down. Lot was being rushed out of the city and told not to even look back as it was being destroyed. With Noah, the people were warned and did not believe so yeah, destruction came upon them swiftly...just like it is going to happen in the end.
There were no secret raptures in any of those events.
Well - yes and no.There can be no conclusion if the gaps are not filled!
Speaking of secret, there is something that Paul made reference to as secret, he called it a "mystery." I would say somewhat of a secret.
But you make up your own mind by reading it.
1 Cor. 15:51
"Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,"
Paul is giving us something here that no other writer of scripture gives us. It's a revelation that has not been known concerning the resurrection. This to me is interesting in that it can be taken in different ways depending on whether you are pre/post.
The way I see it as a pre-trib is that Paul is explaining something that is separate from the resurrection that we read at the Second Coming. This does not match the events of the Second Coming. This is where the pre-trib venture begins.
Well - yes and no.
This is what the post-trib view does:
1) read scripture
2) draw conclusions based on what scripture-and-scripture-alone [really actually] says
3) build on that solid foundation, "filling the gaps" with only that which agrees with all scripture
This is what the pre-trib view does:
1) read scripture
2) fill the gaps with whatever seems to connect different passages together in the best way to align with the most favorable outcome that will allow us to be comfortable in the belief that we will never have to face anything even close to what millions of martyrs in the past have experienced
3) ignore any simple direct straight-forward blatent statements in scripture in favor of the intended result from #2
And, I am not trying to insult anyone - this is honestly the way I see it!
These are the same angels mentioned in Genesis 6 that we just read about.
Rev. 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
There is another "flood" coming; only this flood is a flood of lies spewed forth by Satan himself to deceive the whole world.
Rev. 12:15-16 And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. (16) And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
Re tead it
41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
Jesus said to watch for the "one taken"...."at his coming"
All the examples of" taken / left"
Are peacetime and normal life.
So it is not the second coming on horses nor is it an imaginary "taken to a bad place".
Further, they are all comrades.
Working, fellowshipping and in the same bed (in one example)
Well - yes and no.
This is what the post-trib view does:
1) read scripture
2) draw conclusions based on what scripture-and-scripture-alone [really actually] says
3) build on that solid foundation, "filling the gaps" with only that which agrees with all scripture
This is what the pre-trib view does:
1) read scripture
2) fill the gaps with whatever seems to connect different passages together in the best way to align with the most favorable outcome that will allow us to be comfortable in the belief that we will never have to face anything even close to what millions of martyrs in the past have experienced
3) ignore any simple direct straight-forward blatent statements in scripture in favor of the intended result from #2
And, I am not trying to insult anyone - this is honestly the way I see it!
Paul never speaks of the rapture is that passage. He is speaking of the change from being mortal to being immortal. That happens before the rapture does.
Paul's intent here is to address how people become immortal. He mentioned how the dead become immortal and he mentions how the living become immortal. The rapture is not mentioned once.
This is what the post-trib view does:
1) read scripture
2) draw conclusions based on what scripture-and-scripture-alone [really actually] says
3) build on that solid foundation, "filling the gaps" with only that which agrees with all scripture
This is what the pre-trib view does:
1) read scripture
2) fill the gaps with whatever seems to connect different passages together in the best way to align with the most favorable outcome that will allow us to be comfortable in the belief that we will never have to face anything even close to what millions of martyrs in the past have experienced
3) ignore any simple direct straight-forward blatent statements in scripture in favor of the intended result from #2
That could be and it could be you are running with conjecture.