... been there done that
And we never know what them there female critters are actually thinking do we. Hmmmmm.
... been there done that
I think we are all in agreement that 'he' is the Holy Spirit.OK, show us who "he" is in 2Thes. 2:7. This "he" is taken out of the way, and then the anti-christ is revealed.
Who is "he?"
I think we are all in agreement that 'he' is the Holy Spirit.
Within born-again believers, of course!And where does the Holy Spirit dwell?
Within born-again believers, of course!
However, there are at least three possible ways to "take away" the Holy Spirit (with regard to the issue at hand):
1) Rapture
2) Apostasy
3) Death
All three may apply in terms of very large numbers.
There is 2:1 stacked against you - you cannot afford to 'guess' or 'assume' anything.
Which he directly ties to 'the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ' and 'our gathering together unto him'.Paul's discussion is only concerned with one 'event' - not two. And, that event is 'the day of Christ'.
Which he directly ties to 'the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ' and 'our gathering together unto him'.
OK, show us who "he" is in 2Thes. 2:7. This "he" is taken out of the way, and then the anti-christ is revealed.
Who is "he?"
It's not the church who is a she.
It is very plainly presented to us as 'Apostasy'. (By virtue of the greek word definition - why can you not accept it?)We have no choice but to choose one that best fits the scripture as it is presented to us.
You need to understand the 'crux' of this issue. It is not about "removing the Holy Spirit [from the earth]. It is about the "diminishing" of the power of the working of the Holy Spirit in the earth.While remembering that John told us the Holy Spirit is God, would it be reasonable to "assume" that when the Holy Spirit is taken out of the way for the wrath of the tribulation to begin, that the Holy Spirit takes with Him what belongs to Him, the believer?
What makes you think that 'taken out of the way' is referring to something happening very quickly? It does not actually indicate that.Thereby the "snatching away" so often discussed in this subject!
It is very plainly presented to us as 'Apostasy'. (By virtue of the greek word definition - why can you not accept it?)
You need to understand the 'crux' of this issue. It is not about "removing the Holy Spirit [from the earth]. It is about the "diminishing" of the power of the working of the Holy Spirit in the earth.
What makes you think that 'taken out of the way' is referring to something happening very quickly? It does not actually indicate that.
The Holy Spirit does not operate as some presidents, leaving their own behind.
lol, what? Your doctrine is the one leaving behind the greatest saints of the modern era with the two witnesses and the 144k left on the Earth. Before you say it, no, they don't convert during the Great Tribulation. They are all saved Christians before the beast ever comes to power.
They are all martyred for preaching the kingdom of God! I don't know what you're talking about.
OK, show us who "he" is in 2Thes. 2:7. This "he" is taken out of the way, and then the anti-christ is revealed.
Who is "he?"
Again you make a false accusation about post-trib that actually is true of pre-trib and when that is brought to your attention you use a red herring fallacy to change the subject.
There are no left behind saints in post-trib but there is in pre-trib. Again, pre-trib is the junk doctrine, wrong in basically everything it preaches, not based on the bible and rejects expert sources like Strong's etc on the meaning of Apostasia.
"There you go again..."I don't think so! He is concerned of this Church believing "that the day of Christ/Lord" has already come.
That day is concerning wrath on this entire world, which includes the tribulation and the destroying of the anit-christ at the Second Coming.
Then Paul begins speaking of the Rapture and tell them in 1 Thes. 5"9 that we (the Church) are not appointed to wrath but the salvation of the Lord.
"There you go again..."
You are believing things built on assumptions rather than what scripture is actually saying.
Let me ask you something...
If we know:
1) The Two Witnesses serve a 3.5-year "commission" - at the end of which they are killed.
2) They are killed by 'the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit'.
3) The bottomless pit is "opened" during the Trumpet 5 events.
4) The Two Witnesses are obviously not killed before the bottomless pit is "opened" - and certainly not before [that] which the beast that kills them "comes forth" out of.
What can we learn from this?