Are you caught up, yet?
*takes over an hour to reply to this...*
Yup! lol
Are you caught up, yet?
Yes, one in Matt. 24:29-31 and the other in Matt. 24:36-51.Jesus reveals 2 "comings" in mat 24
NO.....If a Preacher writes a letter today t his flock is that the WORD OF GOD? Maybe, or maybe not, it could be inspired by God, but at the same time if a pastor is having a hard time getting his flock to understand something he might embellish it to get them to see the picture. Do you understand the difference in time via a blinking of an eyelash? It is considered a moment, not even a second, so WHY did Paul feel the need to say the Dead are "RAISED FIRST" a Blinking of an eye BEFORE those of us on earth who are alive at his coming?It is the Holy Spirit speaking through Paul.
It is the word of God
Not paul
We can use all three, but there is no use, using one or the other is always the best way, so doing all three hen taking notes off all three is a better way to go else you win up conflating things, from my experience. I will use Matt 24If you are interested, you can see with what I believe each verse is associated here:
http://mywebsite.us/BibleStudy/Olivet_Discourse.html
I have just sent an email to deactivate my account. Y’all won’t have to deal with me anymore. And I doAt one time, I could say that about you - but, not any more - I do not allow it.
Sometimes, I could say that about you. But, I am not saying this to provoke you to anger; rather, I am saying this to encourage you to remember that - in this environment - sometimes, our perceptions can be "way off" from what is really intended in a post.
So, we must allow a wide margin of possibility of error in perception.
We should at least 'make sure' that our perception is correct before we 'react'.
If necessary - "be the better man" - be the strong mature brother who is always ready to help a weak[er] brother.
But, is this really the way the Lord wants us to be?
Some say there is one second coming.Please tell me you said this strictly to be funny...
Otherwise ------ you are kidding, right?
So you say the bible is not inspired by the Holy Spirit.Yes, one in Matt. 24:29-31 and the other in Matt. 24:36-51.
NO.....If a Preacher writes a letter today t his flock is that the WORD OF GOD? Maybe, or maybe not, it could be inspired by God, but at the same time if a pastor is having a hard time getting his flock to understand something he might embellish it to get them to see the picture. Do you understand the difference in time via a blinking of an eyelash? It is considered a moment, not even a second, so WHY did Paul feel the need to say the Dead are "RAISED FIRST" a Blinking of an eye BEFORE those of us on earth who are alive at his coming?
Go back and reread 1 Thessalonians and 2b Thessalonians and even 1 and 2 Corinthians, you had many people doubting because their loved ones had died, so Paul was trying to reassure them their loved ones would not be left in the grave, and would be taken to heaven, thus he sys they are RESURRECTED FIRST, a Blink of an eye before those of us who are alive. NOW REMEMBER another Paul moto, I will be ALL THINGS unto ALL PEOPLE that I might win souls. So, Paul uses himself as a soul winner first and foremost, not a Thus Saith the Lord Prophet. I think we are all Resurrected at the exact same time, Paul tryi g to reassure the Thessalonians that their dead loved ones will be taken to heaven bothers me not. Paul is also wrong about the Anti-Christ entering the temple, Jesus says it's a Graven Image that STANDS where it OUGHT NIT STAND !! (Matt. 24:15-17) In Rev. 13 John sats the False Prophet places THE IMAGE of the Beast in the Temple. In Dan., 12:11-12 Jesus (Man in Linen) says its the 1290 False Prophet that stops Jesus Worship (takes away THE Sacrifice which is Jesus, not some stupid/profane Meat Sacrifice) and places the AoD.
The RCC placed the Letters of Paul in the bible. They re letters to his flock, they re ot THUS SAITH THE LORD. No matter how much yu say they are, they re not THUS SAITH THE LORD biblical scriptures, tey are letters unto his flock.
No dont do that.I have just sent an email to deactivate my account. Y’all won’t have to deal with me anymore. And I do
Not have to watch people be bullied by others anymore
God bless you
Yes, one in Matt. 24:29-31 and the other in Matt. 24:36-51.
NO.....If a Preacher writes a letter today t his flock is that the WORD OF GOD? Maybe, or maybe not, it could be inspired by God, but at the same time if a pastor is having a hard time getting his flock to understand something he might embellish it to get them to see the picture. Do you understand the difference in time via a blinking of an eyelash? It is considered a moment, not even a second, so WHY did Paul feel the need to say the Dead are "RAISED FIRST" a Blinking of an eye BEFORE those of us on earth who are alive at his coming?
Go back and reread 1 Thessalonians and 2b Thessalonians and even 1 and 2 Corinthians, you had many people doubting because their loved ones had died, so Paul was trying to reassure them their loved ones would not be left in the grave, and would be taken to heaven, thus he sys they are RESURRECTED FIRST, a Blink of an eye before those of us who are alive. NOW REMEMBER another Paul moto, I will be ALL THINGS unto ALL PEOPLE that I might win souls. So, Paul uses himself as a soul winner first and foremost, not a Thus Saith the Lord Prophet. I think we are all Resurrected at the exact same time, Paul tryi g to reassure the Thessalonians that their dead loved ones will be taken to heaven bothers me not. Paul is also wrong about the Anti-Christ entering the temple, Jesus says it's a Graven Image that STANDS where it OUGHT NIT STAND !! (Matt. 24:15-17) In Rev. 13 John sats the False Prophet places THE IMAGE of the Beast in the Temple. In Dan., 12:11-12 Jesus (Man in Linen) says its the 1290 False Prophet that stops Jesus Worship (takes away THE Sacrifice which is Jesus, not some stupid/profane Meat Sacrifice) and places the AoD.
The RCC placed the Letters of Paul in the bible. They re letters to his flock, they re ot THUS SAITH THE LORD. No matter how much yu say they are, they re not THUS SAITH THE LORD biblical scriptures, tey are letters unto his flock.
Yes, one in Matt. 24:29-31 and the other in Matt. 24:36-51.
NO.....If a Preacher writes a letter today t his flock is that the WORD OF GOD? Maybe, or maybe not, it could be inspired by God, but at the same time if a pastor is having a hard time getting his flock to understand something he might embellish it to get them to see the picture. Do you understand the difference in time via a blinking of an eyelash? It is considered a moment, not even a second, so WHY did Paul feel the need to say the Dead are "RAISED FIRST" a Blinking of an eye BEFORE those of us on earth who are alive at his coming?
Go back and reread 1 Thessalonians and 2b Thessalonians and even 1 and 2 Corinthians, you had many people doubting because their loved ones had died, so Paul was trying to reassure them their loved ones would not be left in the grave, and would be taken to heaven, thus he sys they are RESURRECTED FIRST, a Blink of an eye before those of us who are alive. NOW REMEMBER another Paul moto, I will be ALL THINGS unto ALL PEOPLE that I might win souls. So, Paul uses himself as a soul winner first and foremost, not a Thus Saith the Lord Prophet. I think we are all Resurrected at the exact same time, Paul tryi g to reassure the Thessalonians that their dead loved ones will be taken to heaven bothers me not. Paul is also wrong about the Anti-Christ entering the temple, Jesus says it's a Graven Image that STANDS where it OUGHT NIT STAND !! (Matt. 24:15-17) In Rev. 13 John sats the False Prophet places THE IMAGE of the Beast in the Temple. In Dan., 12:11-12 Jesus (Man in Linen) says its the 1290 False Prophet that stops Jesus Worship (takes away THE Sacrifice which is Jesus, not some stupid/profane Meat Sacrifice) and places the AoD.
The RCC placed the Letters of Paul in the bible. They re letters to his flock, they re ot THUS SAITH THE LORD. No matter how much yu say they are, they re not THUS SAITH THE LORD biblical scriptures, tey are letters unto his flock.
I am sad to see you go. Never mind about bullies. Everyone ALWAYS reaps what they sow.I have just sent an email to deactivate my account. Y’all won’t have to deal with me anymore. And I do
Not have to watch people be bullied by others anymore
God bless you
I disagree: when Jesus mentioned "the end" He was speaking of His coming to Armageddon. I agree with you in part: He started at the beginning of the church age, so when He said, "the end is not yet, He was still speaking of church age events: wars, rumors of wars, earthquakes, pestilences (covid) etc—all church age events. Even the midpoint abomination was not the end. That was before the worse part: the days of GT. I can't find much, if ANYTHING here pertaining to the church. Jesus was talking to Jewish men about the end of THEIR AGE. The truth is, the church will be returning WITH Him, as will the Old Testament saints, the beheaded, the Two Witnesses—heaven will be emptied—most of the angels will also return: all as the "armies" of heaven. Who knows? Perhaps many of the saints will be given swords to assist in Armageddon and the wrap up.We can use all three, but there is no use, using one or the other is always the best way, so doing all three hen taking notes off all three is a better way to go else you win up conflating things, from my experience. I will use Matt 24
You get verse 13 correct, that is indeed referring to the end of men's/disciples lives, or running the full marathon.
Now, here is 2 or 3 reasons why I think you get off on the wrong foot. 1.) THE END is not fully comprehended by you. 2.) You don't quite grasp how clever Jesus is with his THREE MENTIONS of false christs/false prophets and understand that Jesus, in ALL THREE are pointing to THREE SPECIFIC TIME PERIODS. 3.) Zechariah shows Israel REPENTING via 1/3 of the Nation coming unto Jesus, in reality, you know that did not happen in AD 70. (It's one of those, YEA, but I got to make it fit moments for you......SMILE, I used to be the same way)
OK, let's discuss why THE END is so important and what it means here. Jesus is speaking about the coming 70th WEEK END where Israel goes through so many troubles that they turn unto Jesus Christ during this 70th week and repent, just like Zechariah 13:8-9 says AND just like Malachi 4:5-6 says.
So, Jesus starts off answering their question about WHEN WLL THESE THINGS BE? (Temples Destruction) And that comes in verses 4-6, he tells them not to let anyone DECEIVE THEM, there will be many that come saying I am Christ or the Messiah who will deceive many, don't believe it, you will hear wars and rumors of wars (from afar in 70 AD) but don't be troubled, the..........END IS NOT YET (70 AD is not the END, that is by and by or LATER ON)
So, Jesus did not want the disciples rushing back unto Jerusalem thinking THE END (70th-week redemption and Jerusalem/Israel being redeemed by Jesus and Jesus reigning there for 1000 years) had come, thus he, LATER ON, tells them SPECIFICALLY what brings THE END where they can not get it wrong, in verse 14. But here Jesus tells them that fake christs will deceive many. John 5:43 is fulfilled here, not during the END TIMES. The Pharisees and Jewish leaders knew Rome was the Fourth Beast, thus they put forth Messianic figures from 66 AD - 70 AD hoping that one would be that hoped-for "Political Savior" they saw the Messiah as. Thus Jesus not only warns them not to come back unto Jerusalem at this time, even though they would hear of wars and rumors of wars and fake christs, he later on in verse 14 explains unto them that the Gospel must be preached unto ALL THE WORLD, and only then would THE END come (70th week). Thus his Disciples could not be TRICKED by Satan, because they knew India and China had to have heard the Gospel before THE END (70th week) could come. Thus Jesus here is telling his disciples what their future would bring AND what brings the 70th-week end times.)
That is why I say verses 4-6 are SPECIFICALLY about 70 AD.
In verses 7-14 we are shown the Church Age, and Jesus was explaining this unto his Disciples, thus the mention of false prophets in verse 11 is specifically about false teachers, notice it's not false christs here as in verse 5, it is false prophets. So, Jesus starts laying down all the signs that lead up to the Second Coming in Matt. 24 29-:31 since this is about the Jews' END TIME fate. But he's also speaking of the Church Age period because Jews are also in the Church, of course, the Disciples were all Jews.
So, Nations will war against Nations, Ethos against Ethos (race against race), there will be earthquakes, famines, and plagues (think of the Black Plague, think of COVID 19 etc.) and Jesus said this is the beginning of Sorrows or a Birthpang, in other words, Jesus painted the Churh Age as BIRTHING the 70th-week end that was yet to come. He then tried to ready the Disciples for their coming fate (Death) and he says hey, you will be hated for my name's sake, they will send out false lying prophets and they will find ways and reasons to eventual put you to death (this is why one disciple, elsewhere, asked about John who was no doubt told he would never be put to death and Jesus basically told him to let him worry about that). Jesus tells them that sin and iniquity will abound and many people's love would wax cold. He tells them that, AND THEN RIGHT AWAY says, but only he who ENDURES UNTO THE END will be SAVED !! Thus he is warning them not to punk out as we would say it, keep the faith to the very end even when they threaten you with death. Then in verse 14 Jesus finally tells them what brings THE END (70th week)
When the Gospel is preached unto the WHOLE WORLD then and then only will the END COME (70th week).
Then Jesus goes straight into the 70th weeK with verse 15 and the AoD. The Gospel is still being preached, when the Church is Raptured, the 70th week will come, but not until after the Rapture.
In verses 15-21 Jesus is speaking about the 70th week Jesus fleeing after they REPENT and in verse 24 we see the THIRD MENTION of false ptophets/chists in that THE False Prophet and THE Ant-Christ who work miracles are mentioned at this time. So, there is a rhyme and reason to everything in Matt. 24, people for the most part just overlook it.
Did you tear them out of your bible?Yes, one in Matt. 24:29-31 and the other in Matt. 24:36-51.
NO.....If a Preacher writes a letter today t his flock is that the WORD OF GOD? Maybe, or maybe not, it could be inspired by God, but at the same time if a pastor is having a hard time getting his flock to understand something he might embellish it to get them to see the picture. Do you understand the difference in time via a blinking of an eyelash? It is considered a moment, not even a second, so WHY did Paul feel the need to say the Dead are "RAISED FIRST" a Blinking of an eye BEFORE those of us on earth who are alive at his coming?
Go back and reread 1 Thessalonians and 2b Thessalonians and even 1 and 2 Corinthians, you had many people doubting because their loved ones had died, so Paul was trying to reassure them their loved ones would not be left in the grave, and would be taken to heaven, thus he sys they are RESURRECTED FIRST, a Blink of an eye before those of us who are alive. NOW REMEMBER another Paul moto, I will be ALL THINGS unto ALL PEOPLE that I might win souls. So, Paul uses himself as a soul winner first and foremost, not a Thus Saith the Lord Prophet. I think we are all Resurrected at the exact same time, Paul tryi g to reassure the Thessalonians that their dead loved ones will be taken to heaven bothers me not. Paul is also wrong about the Anti-Christ entering the temple, Jesus says it's a Graven Image that STANDS where it OUGHT NIT STAND !! (Matt. 24:15-17) In Rev. 13 John sats the False Prophet places THE IMAGE of the Beast in the Temple. In Dan., 12:11-12 Jesus (Man in Linen) says its the 1290 False Prophet that stops Jesus Worship (takes away THE Sacrifice which is Jesus, not some stupid/profane Meat Sacrifice) and places the AoD.
The RCC placed the Letters of Paul in the bible. They re letters to his flock, they re ot THUS SAITH THE LORD. No matter how much yu say they are, they re not THUS SAITH THE LORD biblical scriptures, tey are letters unto his flock.
Dude, Christians are tough, the way I have learned all I have over 35 plus years is by debate, Peter and Paul had a very harsh debate. I don't just get angry when someone tries to corner me, I try to TEACH THEM God's truths, I use that chance to layout His truths in layers that can not be denied.I have just sent an email to deactivate my account. Y’all won’t have to deal with me anymore. And I do
Not have to watch people be bullied by others anymore
God bless you
No, you said that, I said Pauls letters were not "THUS SAITH THE LORD" as were the Prophets of Old which could NEVER BE WRONG. A holy Spirot led sermon by a Holy Spirit led preacher can have some UNGODLY FACTS in there because people pass down things they have heard in their life which are just not factual, but they think it is factual, that doesn't mean he is not of God or the sermon was not of God.So you say the bible is not inspired by the Holy Spirit.
No God breathed anything in the bible...correct?
Did you tear them out of your bible?
There are parts of our bible that was not inspired: Job's three friends answers, for example. We find later on in Job they were all wrong! But God inspired someone to include them. Peter, when he tried to correct Jesus for another example. Did you not read that WE - the church - will be JUDGED by Paul's gospel? You better rethink your position on Paul! God will be asking you about it. Do you not understand that if God had not sent Paul with His gospel, to the gentiles, you and I would still be heathens? We all owe Paul a great price. His written epistles are the gospel for the gentiles.
The "twinkling of an eye" is strictly associated only with "the change" and not the Resurrection or the Rapture.The order is:
1) Resurrection
2) "the change"
3) Rapture
Line upon line, precept upon precept, here a little there a little.Paul does not say a blink in the eye before us - read it again - he is talkinging about the transition from the dead body into the Glorified one.
I disagree: when Jesus mentioned "the end" He was speaking of His coming to Armageddon. I agree with you in part: He started at the beginning of the church age, so when He said, "the end is not yet, He was still speaking of church age events: wars, rumors of wars, earthquakes, pestilences (covid) etc—all church age events. Even the midpoint abomination was not the end. That was before the worse part: the days of GT. I can't find much, if ANYTHING here pertaining to the church. Jesus was talking to Jewish men about the end of THEIR AGE. The truth is, the church will be returning WITH Him, as will the Old Testament saints, the beheaded, the Two Witnesses—heaven will be emptied—most of the angels will also return: all as the "armies" of heaven. Who knows? Perhaps many of the saints will be given swords to assist in Armageddon and the wrap up.
The point went RIGHT OVER YOUR HEAD !! Sadly.Did you tear them out of your bible?
There are parts of our bible that was not inspired: Job's three friends answers, for example. We find later on in Job they were all wrong! But God inspired someone to include them. Peter, when he tried to correct Jesus for another example. Did you not read that WE - the church - will be JUDGED by Paul's gospel? You better rethink your position on Paul! God will be asking you about it. Do you not understand that if God had not sent Paul with His gospel, to the gentiles, you and I would still be heathens? We all owe Paul a great price. His written epistles are the gospel for the gentiles.