Pfizer's vaccine trial questioned over data integrity, regulatory oversight
this information is all over the web and following is just one of many many articles that can be found doing a simple search on "falsified Pfizer research"
Pfizer "falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in its pivotal phase III trial," a former regional director at the Texas-based research organization Ventavia Research Group, which managed Pfizer vaccine trial sites, was quoted as saying.
Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding, the article added.
Before she blew the whistle to the journal, the former regional director, with more than 15 years of experience in clinical research coordination and management, was fired for repeatedly reporting massive clinical trial violations of Pfizer, including having emailed a complaint to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
While verifying her statements and the information provided, The BMJ received more evidence confirming that the vaccine trials did not meet the standards declared by Pfizer, including improper storage of jabs, violations of the norms of blind testing, frequent data errors and slow response to side effects complaints, the article said.
source
***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Pfizer is simply acting within 'character'. the above is par for the course in the way Pfizer has conducted itself in the past and even though they have had to pay out what amounts to billions of dollars to settle court cases because of adverse effects of drugs they swore up and down were safe, they continue to operate as though they were the best hope for mankind.
following some examples of Pfizer being 'caught' in their lies and faulty data
The appointment of Dr. Bernard Prigent, vice-president and medical director of Pfizer Canada, to the Governing Council of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, outraged many Canadian health researchers.
Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results. Since 2002 the company and its subsidiaries have been assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. The $2.3-billion settlement in September 2009 – a month before Dr. Prigent's appointment – set a new record for both criminal fines and total penalties. A link with Pfizer might well advance the commercialization of Canadian research – unhindered by law or morality. Is that now the only mandate, Dr. Beaudet?
source
if you continue to read past the above on the site, you can catch up on J & J and their shenanigans. kickbacks and very bad side effects seem to work well together for these monster sized drug companies
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pfizer Inc agreed on Wednesday to plead guilty to a U.S. criminal charge relating to promotion of its now-withdrawn Bextra pain medicine and will pay a record $2.3 billion to settle allegations
it improperly marketed 13 medicines.
The world’s biggest drugmaker was slapped with the huge fines by the U.S. government after being deemed a repeat offender in pitching drugs to patients and doctors for unapproved uses.
Pfizer pleaded guilty in 2004 to an earlier criminal charge of improper sales tactics and its practices have been under U.S. supervision since then.
source
I mean do your homework folks. do your homework. and please remember none of these drug pushing super giants with their tentacles in every pie worldwide are liable for ANY problems with the current non-vaccines the government is trying to force on everyone.
the so called covid vaccine is NOT APPROVED, despite the way that has been presented by the media. we are all still in clinical trials and now children with fearful and deceived parents are being presented as more guinea pigs for the trials.
ps...I am not engaging with anyone stuck in emotional fits of rage or presenting biased and personal anecdotes. in fact, there are many reasons to do your own research and none to ignore the information that is available.