I found an article this morning on the origin of the rapture doctrine.
It is clear that the popular belief of postribbers concerning the origin of the pre-tribulation rapture is basically a bunch of Lies.
Personally I have looked very little into the history eschatology concerning the beliefs of the church fathers.
But I find it amazing how bogus post tribulation adherents have framed the origins of all eschatology.
This article is an eye opener for the eschatology hounds;
https://tms.edu/m/tmsj13e.pdf
"The early fathers treated these issues of persecution in a simplistic, unreflective manner, which
is hardly a well developed posttribulational position.33 This data leads Crutchfield
to describe thoughtfully the still unclear writings of the fathers as “intratribulation-
al,” that is, “within” or “during” the tribulation.34
In the end, no one can produce a clear statement of patristic eschatology
regarding the rapture. What can be concluded is the following:
• The early fathers placed strong emphasis upon imminency.
• They early fathers understood a literal coming of Christ, and a literal 1,000-
year kingdom to follow.
• A type of imminent intratribulationism (Crutchfield) or imminent
posttribulationism (Walvoord)35
with occasional pretribulational inferences
was believed.36
• The early fathers understood a kind of “practical persecution,” due to times
of general Roman persecution that they experienced, rather than a specific
fulfillment of future tribulational wrath.
Cruthchfield rightly concludes,
This view of the fathers on imminency, and, in some, references to escaping the time of
the Tribulation, constitute what may be termed, to quote Erickson, ‘seeds from which the
doctrine of the pretribulational rapture could be developed. . . .” Had it not been for the
drought in sound exegesis, brought on by Alexandrian allegorism and later by Augustine,
one wonders what kind of crop those seeds might have yielded—long before J. N. Darby
and the nineteenth century.
37"