What... EXACTLY.. are you claiming?And currently God is warning us again...
Currently we have both Kamala Harris and Nancy Pelosi as leadership in our Government.
What... EXACTLY.. are you claiming?And currently God is warning us again...
Currently we have both Kamala Harris and Nancy Pelosi as leadership in our Government.
In order to refute my opinions you would have to come up with scripture that says the opposite of them.I have refuted your opinions since you arrived as have many others
I have demonstrated logic that is valid even if it is not always airtight.You have demonstrated that you have little understanding of logic, so your comments on the subject have little to no merit.
In order to refute my opinions you would have to come up with scripture that says the opposite of them.
And if you did that, I would change my opinion.
As are you.
That God is warning America that it needs to get it together. We are in Trouble (notice the capital "T").What... EXACTLY.. are you claiming?
Okay, but what does this have to do with Harris and Pelosi? I'm not seeing the connection to the thread topic.That God is warning America that it needs to get it together. We are in Trouble (notice the capital "T").
And if we don't get it together soon it's going to get worse for us.
A child is the last warning...then it's serious consequences time.
I actually have quite a low opinion of myself.that is actually funny
I would like to see you change your absurdly high opinion of yourself but seeing that it is like that...well....prolly not
but unlike you, not judging the heart...
Right...Okay, but what does this have to do with Harris and Pelosi? I'm not seeing the connection to the thread topic.
I'd be happy to do that, but it would take a while as there are so many examples.Use the quote feature and show any of my posts where I have pointed the finger and judged the heart of any individual here.
I see you prefer being a jackdonkey to respectfully answering my question. Your "connection" is missing the ground wire of reality.Right...
You aren't making the connection!
My exact point all this time!
Ok, I am waiting (one example should suffice).I'd be happy to do that, but it would take a while as there are so many examples.
Use the quote feature and show any of my posts where I have pointed the finger and judged the heart of any individual here.
At any rate, @Dino246,
It is your prerogative to read modern translations and to reject the kjv as inerrant and inspired.
I believe that in doing so you reveal yourself as being one of whom Paul prophesied about in 2 Timothy 4:3.
Okay, I can see where someone might think that I am judging their heart by such a statement.Here's one from the KJV-onlyist thread...
And more insults....I see you prefer being a jackdonkey to respectfully answering my question. Your "connection" is missing the ground wire of reality.
What is the congregational order? 1 Corinthians 11:3Aren't we all one in Christ Jesus(Galatians 3:28)?
Aren't we all to be kings & priests(or a kingdom of priests) unto God(Revelation 5:10)?
Didn't Acts 2 plainly state that on sons & daughters, servants & handmaidens the Holy Spirit would be poured out on them, and they would prophesy(speak for God)?
Aren't we all the sons of God(Romans 8:14, 9:26, 1Jn 3:1)?
Aren't we all right now joint heirs in Christ with equal privileges with God(Romans 8:17, 1 Peter 3:7)?
Does God discriminate? How many scriptures say that God is no respector of persons?
If women are be able to do these things listed according to scripture, why then is it so hard to accept that women can minister with the same Spirit in all things just as the men?
I don't believe for one moment that God called women into a limited second-class ministry.
Perhaps you missed this:What is the congregational order? 1 Corinthians 11:3
"But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. "
Rewriting the congregational order is inspired by hubris not the Holy Spirit.
A father can also be in authority over his daughter.Perhaps you missed this:
The head of the woman is the man.
There is only one context where that can be true of singular persons: marriage.