OK, but i tend towards the evidentiary findings
i also know and agree that videos and pictures can be faked/staged/altered
Vaccination?
- Thread starter seed_time_harvest
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
OK, but i tend towards the evidentiary findings
i also know and agree that videos and pictures can be faked/staged/altered
A Rebuttal of Dr. Sherri Tenpenny:
Tenpenny began by saying she's spent up to 10,000 hours researching vaccines since the pandemic began.
There's only been around 11,000 total hours since the Ohio state of emergency was declared, so that'd be 22 hours per day.
Just to give you a sense of her accuracy chops
Tenpenny began by saying she's spent up to 10,000 hours researching vaccines since the pandemic began.
There's only been around 11,000 total hours since the Ohio state of emergency was declared, so that'd be 22 hours per day.
Just to give you a sense of her accuracy chops
Since the Plandemic began = 2019
8766 x 2 = 17532
we all tend to exaggerate =
How big is the Salmon in the picture DaveTree?
DaveTree = you should of been there it was close to 40lbs
Reality = about 30lbs
That was a copy/paste of Propaganda:
Tyler Buchanan
@Tylerjoelb
Tenpenny began by saying she's spent up to 10,000 hours researching vaccines since the pandemic began There's only been around 11,000 total hours since the Ohio state of emergency was declared, so that'd be 22 hours per day. Just to give you a sense of her accuracy chops
9:24 AM · Jun 8, 2021·Twitter Web App
Why are you referencing Ohio state ?
Did she say "beginning with the Ohio state of E"
again, doctors, politicians and fishermen like to exaggerate = a lot
My wife does all the time - just her way of emphasizing a point.
i have done and i am sure we all have done it
She testified cell phones were sticking to the foreheads of vaxxed people, even though, this is actually common because the Electro brain waves create similar circuitry as electromagnetics.
I was just going over her Testimony before the Ohio State Government.
Why don't you find some willing participants yourself -
1.) You need a very strong magnet = this is crucial
2.) Individuals who were vaxxed
3.) with different vaxx
4.) multiple vaxx recipients
the vaccine mandate is a sham. Those who say it is needed yet speak nothing to the 50, 000 Haitians who are coming and the over 300,000 who have come into the United States and are not required to vaccinate This IS THE MOST TELLING ABUSE OF THOSE IN AUTHORITY. to think otherwise is foolish.
I feel, since I've had both Pfizer Vax, I qualify as a Test Subject for the magnetic Proposal.
And in all sincere honestly, we've tried the Black Strobe Light in a Dark Room looking for BLUE where I was Vaxxed, we've tried multiple powered and sizes of magnets, and I've been around hundreds of People who have never caught Covid from me being Vaxxed.
In fact, EVERY IDEA and PROPOSED TRUTH concerning left over Residue, Metallic Flakes, Passing others Covid, having side effects, whatever it may be that's been Claimed, WE TRIED it out on MYSELF!!
I [absolutely believe] it is ALL 100% Myth, because, Not a Single thing works where I was Vaxxed to think these People know what they're talking about! And from the Walmart Phones to Verizon to T-Mobile, whatever Mobile devices from Apple to Samsung, IT DOES NOT STICK TO MY FOREHEAD!
S
SophieT
Guest
try to keep up
it has been my advice all along when people act a certain way
what are you doing here? what is that question supposed to mean? you are out of your league
as usual
S
SophieT
Guest
Crickets
do you think people hang out here waiting for you to appear so they can have the (questionable) pleasure of answering you?
most people do have a life beyond the forum. perhaps he is out living his
you can see that he is not even here right now, so maybe stop with the fake drama
S
SophieT
Guest
that has been covered. and no, she did not spend her time doing that
you are a little late to the party
S
SophieT
Guest
yes
a concerted effort to remove any video from youtube that is in any way negative towards the vaccine
that has been in the news, so they will be doing their best to take anything down that does not agree with their lies
S
SophieT
Guest
and how supposedly intelligent people IGNORE this and still give the boo boo in the WH a little over 30% approval
are you telling me that there are currently about 30% of the population that thinks it's great to have a super spreader caravan of covid and mixed diseases coming to a southern border near us soon? (I would not trust the polls at this point either...are they polling 90 year olds who do not have a tv?)
and how about that nut job who is a leader among them who is threatening the US with a war if they are not let in?
that, is what is on the way here now. no video can be found of it, but it was on FOX news last night
S
SophieT
Guest
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THIS? how about the safey of US citizens? how about the fact these people are becoming militant and threatening the US? this is an invasion. not a migration. I am being reminded of Nero supposedly fiddling while Rome burned
Revival of “remain in Mexico” policy could have deadly consequences for asylum-seekers, advocates warn
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling to restore a policy that forces people seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border to stay in Mexico could have life-threatening consequences for those migrants, advocacy groups and immigration lawyers say.
On Tuesday night, the justices ruled that President Joe Biden’s administration must restart the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols, informally called the “remain in Mexico” policy. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by Texas and Missouri earlier this year.
Tami Goodlette, director of litigation at the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, a Texas-based organization that advocates for immigrants’ rights, said in a statement that there is nothing “improper, immoral, or wrong about” seeking asylum.
Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision “imposes even more suffering onto families who have come to the U.S. seeking safety and hope and instead must now stay in Mexico where they endure kidnapping, rape, and terrible violence,” Goodlette said.
District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee in Amarillo, ruled last week that the Biden administration violated the law by scrapping the program, which was in effect in 2019 and 2020 and forced roughly 70,000 non-Mexicans to stay in Mexico while their asylum applications were pending.
The Biden administration appealed Kacsmaryk’s ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled in favor of Texas and Missouri after they argued that releasing migrants into the U.S. puts a burden on states because the migrants use state services such as issuing drivers licenses, educating migrant children and providing hospital care. The administration then appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, which declined Biden’s request to temporarily pause Kacsmaryk’s ruling.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which would be responsible for implementing the policy, said that it will comply with the order but that it “respectfully disagrees with the district court’s decision and regrets that the Supreme Court declined to issue a stay.”
Revival of “remain in Mexico” policy could have deadly consequences for asylum-seekers, advocates warn
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling to restore a policy that forces people seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border to stay in Mexico could have life-threatening consequences for those migrants, advocacy groups and immigration lawyers say.
On Tuesday night, the justices ruled that President Joe Biden’s administration must restart the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols, informally called the “remain in Mexico” policy. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by Texas and Missouri earlier this year.
Tami Goodlette, director of litigation at the Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, a Texas-based organization that advocates for immigrants’ rights, said in a statement that there is nothing “improper, immoral, or wrong about” seeking asylum.
Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision “imposes even more suffering onto families who have come to the U.S. seeking safety and hope and instead must now stay in Mexico where they endure kidnapping, rape, and terrible violence,” Goodlette said.
District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee in Amarillo, ruled last week that the Biden administration violated the law by scrapping the program, which was in effect in 2019 and 2020 and forced roughly 70,000 non-Mexicans to stay in Mexico while their asylum applications were pending.
The Biden administration appealed Kacsmaryk’s ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled in favor of Texas and Missouri after they argued that releasing migrants into the U.S. puts a burden on states because the migrants use state services such as issuing drivers licenses, educating migrant children and providing hospital care. The administration then appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, which declined Biden’s request to temporarily pause Kacsmaryk’s ruling.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which would be responsible for implementing the policy, said that it will comply with the order but that it “respectfully disagrees with the district court’s decision and regrets that the Supreme Court declined to issue a stay.”
IT'S HAPPENING AND SHAPING UP for a Coming Peace Treaty involving the 3rd Temple:
Hamas: Jewish prayer on Temple Mount a ‘declaration of war’
Thursday, October 7, 2021 | Tag Cloud Tags: Hamas, Israel, Jerusalem, Muslim, News, Prayer, temple, Temple Mount, War
On the heels of a ruling by an Israeli court, which essentially permits silent Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount, terror group Hamas released a statement calling the decision a “declaration of war.”
The ruling is “a blatant attack on Al Aqsa Mosque and a clear declaration of war,” read a Hamas statment.
“The battle of the sword of Jerusalem [Hamas’ name for Operation Guardian of the Walls] was not and will not be the last chapter of the confrontation [for control] of Jerusalem,” the statement continued.
“The Israeli court’s decision to allow Jews to pray in the courtyard of the blessed Al Aqsa Mosque is an open and direct aggression against the Muslims’ exclusive right to the first two tribes and the third of the two holy mosques,” read a statement from the Palestinian National Council.
Remember, from a scientific observance, that:
#1) You do not know what you were injected with
2.) ingredients can vary since this is an experiment
3) placebos are part of the experiment
Some people will have the magnet test prove clear evidence of such and others will not
Some people will have side effects
Those side effects will vary and can be life threatening producing death while others may be limited to a just discomfort
ALSO these side effects can surface days, weeks, months and years later = Pure Scientific Truth
You forget one important cause/effect/proponent that we have not discussed, but is beyond the natural realm and yet extends into this realm.
Yet you did briefly touch on it a while back.
PEACE
- Status