Most of postrib talking points have nothing to do with a postrib rapture.Though not expressed in the same exact way that we cover the subject today, there are at least a couple of sources I've posted about in past posts, who at least DISTINGUISHED the time of our Rapture to that of Christ's Second Coming to the earth:
John Gill (1748 Commentary) said:
"....here Christ will stop and will be visible to all, and as easily discerned by all, good and bad, as the body of the sun at noon-day; as yet He will not descend on earth, because it is not fit to receive Him; but when that and its works are burnt up, and it is purged and purified by fire, and become a new earth, He'll descend upon it, and dwell with his saints in it: and this suggests another reason why He'll stay in the air, and His saints shall meet Him there, and whom He'll take up with Him into the third heaven, till the general conflagration and burning of the world is over, and to preserve them from it...."
Morgan Edwards (in 1744... and then published it again in 1788):
"II. The distance between the first and second resurrection will be somewhat more than a thousand years.
"I say, somewhat more-, because the dead saints will be raised, and the living changed at Christ's "appearing in the air" (Thess. 4:17); and this will be about three years and a half before the millennium, as we shall see hereafter: but will he and they abide in the air all that time? No: they will ascend to paradise, or to some one of those many "mansions in the father's house" (John 14:2), and disappear during the fore said period of time. The design of this retreat and disappearing will be to judge the risen and changed saints; for "now the time is come that judgment must begin," and that will be "at the house of God" (IPet. iv. 17) . . . (p. 7; The spelling of all Edwards quotes have been modernized.)"
Thomas Ice further explains:
"Edwards clearly separates the rapture from the second coming by three and a half years. He uses modern pretrib rapture verses (1 Thess. 4:17 and John 14:2) to describe the rapture."
Darby being the first?? I don't believe the people purporting such a thing.
This is pure BALONEY. So let me give you a few verses to chew on.
DO ANY OF THESE VERSES SAY THAT THE COMING OF CHRIST WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE TRIBULATION?
Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. (Mt 24:42)
Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh. (v 44)
Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh. (Mt 25:13)
How does a thief come in the night? (1) unannounced, (2) unexpected, (3) unseen. How does Christ come? When we least expect Him and the unbelieving world will not see Him. And that means that His coming for the saints is not connected to anything else, including the Tribulation. This is crystal clear from John 14:1-3.
So now it is time to retract your ludicrous assertions.
To keep it brief there are three view of the Rapture or catching up of the Church to Heaven:
1. The Pre-Tribulation Rapture means that there is no connection between the Tribulation period and the Rapture (which has always been imminent). This is the true biblical doctrine.
2. Mid-Tribulationism postulates that the Rapture is only after the first 3 1/2 years of Daniel's 70th week and that the Church does go through the Tribulation (which corresponds to the reign of the Antichrist).
3. Post-Tribulationism postulates that the Rapture is only after both the Tribulation and the Great Tribulation at the end of Daniel's 70th week. IOW the saints are subject to the wrath of God, contrary to Scripture.
My question to you is: who is it that you say (Scripture tells us) "ENTERS" the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom upon His "RETURN"??
The promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom, variously known as:
--"the age [singular] to come" (immediately follows "the end [singular] of the age [singular]"--Matt13:24,30,39,40,49-50--when the angels will "REAP"; found in Matt12:32 just prior to Jesus speaking to His disciples about "the age [singular] to come");
--"the wedding FEAST / SUPPER" (Matt25:1-13; Matt22:9-14);
--the "meal [G347]" (Luke 12:36-37,38,40,42-44,45-48 "when he will RETURN FROM the wedding" ...THEN the meal [G347]; parallel Matt24:42-51; also as found in Matt8:11 and its parallel);
--"the kingdom OF THE heavenS" (too many to list, but all as found in Matthew);
--the "BLESSED" time (Daniel 12:12 "BLESSED is the one who waiteth, and cometh to the 1335 days"; Found also in about 8 other passages all speaking to the same "setting"/context [their ENTRANCE INTO the earthly MK age]--Rev19:9 [distinct from 19:7]; Matt24:45-47 parallel Lk12:36-37,38,40,42-44); Matt25:31-34; Rev16:15-16 Armageddon time-slot / 2nd Coming to the earth; and MORE...)
--etc... (that's a good start)
____________
According to your viewpoint (if I understand yours aright), you do NOT believe it is the "saints / believers / the righteous / the BLESSED" who ENTER the promised and prophesied EARTHLY Millennial Kingdom (in their mortal bodies, capable of reproducing / bearing children) commencing upon His "RETURN" there, but [...who?? other than this??]
[may the reader compare Matthew 24:37 (2nd Coming to the earth passages) with Daniel 2:35c alongside Gen9:1 "and FILL [/FILLED] the [whole] earth"]
This is pure BALONEY. So let me give you a few verses to chew on.
DO ANY OF THESE VERSES SAY THAT THE COMING OF CHRIST WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE TRIBULATION?
Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. (Mt 24:42)
Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh. (v 44)
Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh. (Mt 25:13)
How does a thief come in the night? (1) unannounced, (2) unexpected, (3) unseen. How does Christ come? When we least expect Him and the unbelieving world will not see Him. And that means that His coming for the saints is not connected to anything else, including the Tribulation. This is crystal clear from John 14:1-3.
So now it is time to retract your ludicrous assertions.
I pity those who cannot comprehend the pretrib rapture. Honestly I really do.....![]()
Answer my post # 1,844. If indeed you can.
And most remarkably, please see Revelation 7:9-14.
Here is yet ANOTHER DIFFERENT group of the redeemed "of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues".
Commentary describing this group is given to John (who is now OBSERVING FROM HEAVEN Rev4:1) by an Elder (ALSO IN HEAVEN), spoken from the mezzanine as if watching the entire spectacle play out ON THE EARTH.
How do the post-tribbers come to terms with TWO GROUPS so disparate in time and description, one (the 24 Elders) CLEARLY PRECEDING THE OTHER, yet both having the common attribute of being the redeemed "of every tribe and tongue and people and nation" ???
Evidently ONLY the pre-tribbers have the right answers to this dilemma. in fact the pre-tribbers ALWAYS have all the right answers ALL THE TIME.....EVERY TIME.....![]()
"No not one, no not one"....!![]()
Where is the scripture that expressly states the church will go through the Great Tribulation?
Reply to post # 1,905 (see attached video).Don't forget
4. Amillennialism, which is the biblical view. Rapture is never mentioned in the Bible. Amillennials know there is no rapture. The word itself was a Mistransliteration by Jerome, in the 4th century AD. He was translating Koine Greek into Latin, but did not know Greek well. He went from harpazo in Greek to rapture in Latin.
I'm a partial preterist. I believe that when Titus razed Jerusalem in 70 AD, the temple caught fire and burned to the ground, and thousands starved to death or died by the sword, etc. That was the tribulation. That was what Jesus warned his disciples about. I believe full preterism is a heresy, because the Second Coming of Jesus has not occurred
TheDivineWatermark said:
My question to you is: who is it that you say (Scripture tells us) "ENTERS" the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom upon His "RETURN"??
The promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom, variously known as:
--"the age [singular] to come" (immediately follows "the end [singular] of the age [singular]"--Matt13:24,30,39,40,49-50--when the angels will "REAP"; found in Matt12:32 just prior to Jesus speaking to His disciples about "the age [singular] to come");
--"the wedding FEAST / SUPPER" (Matt25:1-13; Matt22:9-14);
--the "meal [G347]" (Luke 12:36-37,38,40,42-44,45-48 "when he will RETURN FROM the wedding" ...THEN the meal [G347]; parallel Matt24:42-51; also as found in Matt8:11 and its parallel);
--"the kingdom OF THE heavenS" (too many to list, but all as found in Matthew);
--the "BLESSED" time (Daniel 12:12 "BLESSED is the one who waiteth, and cometh to the 1335 days"; Found also in about 8 other passages all speaking to the same "setting"/context [their ENTRANCE INTO the earthly MK age]--Rev19:9 [distinct from 19:7]; Matt24:45-47 parallel Lk12:36-37,38,40,42-44); Matt25:31-34; Rev16:15-16 Armageddon time-slot / 2nd Coming to the earth; and MORE...)
--etc... (that's a good start)
____________
According to your viewpoint (if I understand yours aright), you do NOT believe it is the "saints / believers / the righteous / the BLESSED" who ENTER the promised and prophesied EARTHLY Millennial Kingdom (in their mortal bodies, capable of reproducing / bearing children) commencing upon His "RETURN" there, but [...who?? other than this??]
[may the reader compare Matthew 24:37 (2nd Coming to the earth passages) with Daniel 2:35c alongside Gen9:1 "and FILL [/FILLED] the [whole] earth"]
Could you please use a modern translation? Or Greek if you want. I've studied modern English, and several years of seminary Greek. Hebrew, French and German. Early Modern English is a language I have never understood. Use the KJV, but remember to put a modern translation after, so the majority can understand! Thanks in advance!
Now that is funnyMost of postrib talking points have nothing to do with a postrib rapture.
Comical indeed
Yeah, William Miller was an "Historicist"... so got off on the wrong footing from the get-go.But Miller ignored the context of the passage and jumped to the conclusion that the “2,300 evenings and mornings” stood for 2,300 days, which, in turn, were symbolic of 2,300 years. Then, assuming the date of the prophecy was 457 BC, Miller added 2,300 years and concluded that the Lord would return in 1843.
There were a number of problems with Miller’s conclusion:
History destroys historicist view.Reply to post # 1,905 (see attached video).
Then reply to post # 1,844.
Amillennialism is a heresy. Preterism is caused by Biblical ignorance. Daniel's 70th week is not broken up into chunks, nor has it started.
Overcome them.I'll just leave this here.
Revelation 13:7-9
7And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 8And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. 9If any man have an ear, let him hear.
Then straiten us out with your true and correct deal.I remember The Late Great Planet Earth. I knew very little about Bible prophecy then so it was easy to believe.
They had a movie & a paperback book. I have witnessed over the years that left-behinder doctrine enjoys a position of entrenched institutional bias in the western mainstream church. They've cluttered up the study of eschatology by imposing their man-made theory over scripture and there is a good deal of anger for anyone who dares to disagree.
There is even a pretribulation rapture "research centre" and they are constantly piecing together apologetics for the doctrine. They even have an annual conference! Why should one non-essential doctrine require so many resources?
"The Pre-Trib Research Center (PTRC) is committed to the study, proclamation, teaching, and defense of the pre-tribulation rapture (pre-70th week of Daniel) and related end-time prophecy."
Pretrib is a business with revenue to protect but they must have known for some years that the pretrib idea isn't sustainable. Not only is it not scripturally sound, it has no historical background in the church. A part of the research centre's function in recent years has been to construct a false historical background story for the new doctrine.
For example, the Great Tribulation has not happened yet up until the present day. Revelation 7:9-14 hasn't happened yet either.
In the pre-trib theory, there are no multitudes of Christians who die in the great tribulation and go to heaven. In your doctrine, all of the Christians get raptured out before the GT - Revelation 7:9-14 refutes pre-trib.
Then straiten us out with your true and correct deal.
Maybe you can be the first to show me my verses are way off?
Nobody else has. Nor have they tried.