JonMaxwell said:
2 Timothy 2:16-18 was written circa ad 50... almost 2,000 years ago. The ENTIRE Bible was written within a period of 1,500 years. 2 Timothy was written by a man named Paul, to a man named Timothy 2,000 years ago. Not from God to us, or even from Paul to us. There WERE some who were in error AT THAT TIME who said that the resurrection was past. The scripture is correct. But that *does not mean* that it has *any* application for today.
2 Timothy 2:16-18 was written circa ad 50... almost 2,000 years ago. The ENTIRE Bible was written within a period of 1,500 years. 2 Timothy was written by a man named Paul, to a man named Timothy 2,000 years ago. Not from God to us, or even from Paul to us. There WERE some who were in error AT THAT TIME who said that the resurrection was past. The scripture is correct. But that *does not mean* that it has *any* application for today.
So your saying Paul writings aren't from God yet there they are in the Bible as scripture. So do we throw away all of Paul's writings or just his letter to Timothy?
The problem with "Preterism" is that it (like the "Amill-teachings" do) completely disregards many passages regarding the CHRONOLOGY issues and TIMING issues...
(...not to mention, not grasping just who the identity known as "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" refers to [Eph1:20-23 WHEN (as to its existence)], mistakenly believing it refers to "all saints of all times"--but is actually who Paul was given the task of addressing in his numerous epistles, unfolding the doctrine pertaining especially to/for/about and concerning "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" i.e. us [by the way, for the readers, Eph1:10's phrase "in the dispensation of the FULNESS OF TIMES" is NOT speaking of the NOW / "in this present age"])
- 1
- Show all