No.Can we all please agree that we have nailed down the identity of the 24 elders?
No.Can we please now move on DavidTree, GaryA (and others)?
No.Can we all please agree that we have nailed down the identity of the 24 elders?
No.Can we please now move on DavidTree, GaryA (and others)?
An absolutely ridiculous conclusion.12 + 12 = 24
The 12 Patriarchs and the 12 Apostles are the 24 Elders of Revelation.
So Jesus said to them, “Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
Matt 19:28
Once again, our Lord Jesus give us clear understanding from His words that we are to follow - not from man/religion.
Every word of God is flawless;
He is a shield to those who take refuge in Him.
Do not add to His words,
lest He rebuke you and prove you a liar. Proverbs 30: 5-6
Thanks for your encouraging reply. Such is the result of careful dedicated scholarship. Just take a look at this thread. Once again the pre-trib rapture stands out as the most obvious clear and compelling case imaginable. The alternative views are holding an empty bag.Thanks, i've been looking into the subject in detail for the past few weeks and i've come to the same conclusion. It seems really obvious to me now, has helped resolve any doubts and strengthened my faith and understanding. What a blessing !
I don't think I've ever encountered a poster who is more wrong more often than you. I mean you are literally batting zero buddy. Zero. I honestly did not think that someone who regularly reads their Bible could be that wrong that often.Yes way - it is literal and not symbolic.
The 'group' you refer to is the "wider" scope - the larger group that the 24 belong to.
It is the larger group mentioned above that is the same group of people.
Just as John - being a single individual belonging to the larger group - about which he speaks --- in the same manner, the 24 - all belonging to the larger group - about which they speak...
You'll have to figure out whether willful rebellion or willful ignorance is your problem. And I thank God that it's not my problem.No.
No.
Would you agree to agree to something that you did not agree with?You'll have to figure out whether willful rebellion or willful ignorance is your problem. And I thank God that it's not my problem.
As I have seen so many times on Christian chat, you start with preterism you end up in the weeds.Would you agree to agree to something that you did not agree with?
There is a very sound argument to be made in favor of "departure". As for me....I completely agree with that application. The term apostasy does not fit anywhere in both books written to the Thessalonians. IMO the context demands "departure", to which fully half a dozen early bible translations agree.
This disproves such a notion:
Rev 5:5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.
One of the literal 24 elders came to speak to John.
Rev 7:13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they?
Rev 7:14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Here again only one of 24 speaks to and he speaks about the great multitude of people who came out of great tribulation which further disproves Pretribs idea idea of saved people not being here for great tribulation.
Rev 11:16 And the four and twenty elders, which sat before God on their seats, fell upon their faces, and worshipped God,
These literal 24 elders also have seats they sit on. This isn't symbolic of a large number of people. The church is not composed of all elders. Elders are higher authority within the church.
Rev 19:1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
Rev 19:2 For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
Rev 19:3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
Rev 19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
Here we see the 24 elders separated from another group of "much people" which further shows 24 elders are not a l;arger group of people but actually 24 elders as it says.
I am all in on "the departure". I preach it everywhere I go.....We are not having that same fruitless discussion again. ((How many times!!? ))
Most pretrib believers don't even agree with those conclusions. It's a completely unorthodox view.
Rev 7:13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they?
Rev 7:14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Here again only one of 24 speaks to and he speaks about the great multitude of people who came out of great tribulation which further disproves Pretribs idea idea of saved people not being here for great tribulation.
it is perfectly reasonable to accept that these "24" are at least "representative" of a vast crowd [BODY] of people (i.e. the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" made up of both Jew and Gentile, but considered neither in our standing before God "IN Christ"--that is, ALL those having come to faith in Christ "in this present age [singular]"--Eph1:20-23 WHEN [as to its existence]
The concept and fact of "tribulation saints" is very clearly laid out in Scripture. It's beyond dispute is far as I am concerned.This disproves such a notion:
Rev 5:5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.
One of the literal 24 elders came to speak to John.
Rev 7:13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they?
Rev 7:14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Here again only one of 24 speaks to and he speaks about the great multitude of people who came out of great tribulation which further disproves Pretribs idea idea of saved people not being here for great tribulation.
Rev 11:16 And the four and twenty elders, which sat before God on their seats, fell upon their faces, and worshipped God,
These literal 24 elders also have seats they sit on. This isn't symbolic of a large number of people. The church is not composed of all elders. Elders are higher authority within the church.
Rev 19:1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:
Rev 19:2 For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.
Rev 19:3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.
Rev 19:4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.
Here we see the 24 elders separated from another group of "much people" which further shows 24 elders are not a l;arger group of people but actually 24 elders as it says.
Again, 2 Pet ch 2 & 3 carries the sentiment that the day of Gods judgment will affect scoffers, false teachers, and apostates who will perish. There is nothing to indicate that the righteous will suffer this same wrath.It is not correct to say that the "pre-trib" viewpoint is that there are no saved people existing on the earth during the great tribulation (or even during the entire 7-year tribulation, as it is commonly called... except perhaps the first few seconds of it [immediately FOLLOWING "our Rapture"]);
I've repeatedly stated that MANY MORE ppl will be coming to faith in Christ FOLLOWING "our Rapture" (THAT is ALSO the viewpoint "pre-trib" has--tho those folks are not "RAPTURED [IN THE AIR]")... Some of them will DIE during the Trib years; Some will make it alive clear through to the end of the Trib years and there are about 8-10 "BLESSED" passages that speak in particular about THOSE very ones: still-living / still-alive saints at the END of the Trib, who will ENTER the EARTHLY MK age in their mortal bodies (capable of reproducing / bearing children)... whereas the ones who DIE in the Trib will be "resurrected [definition: 'to stand again [on the earth]']" FOR the MK (Rev20:4b, for example--referring to the ones who will have DIED during those yrs).
I just made a post yesterday, over in a different thread, addressing some of these points:
Post #35 - https://christianchat.com/threads/t...nd-the-first-resurrection.201520/post-4657300
[notice Peter's talking about "the Day of the Lord" (which is NOT merely "a singular 24-hr day," but a VERY LONG spans of time)... and one of the OT verses he draws from, as you may recall my pointing out, is a verse FROM the CONTEXT of both CHPTS of Isaiah 34-35 (covering a PERIOD OF TIME, not merely "a singular 24-hr day"--tho ppl reading 2Pet3:10-12 insist that's what he saying, INCORRECTLY so, however)... See if you can detect a verse in the context of, say, even just chpt 34 of Isaiah, which provides indication that children / offspring WILL INDEED be being born DURING the MK age following Christ's Second Coming to the earth (Rev19)--Peter is referencing a TIME PERIOD which commences WELL-BEFORE that point (i.e. 7-yr Trib) and extends WELL-BEYOND that point in time (i.e. the promised and prophesied EARTHLY MK age)--not merely a singular point in time, nor merely "a singular 24-hr day" kind of "day"... in his "IN WHICH" phrasing (2Pet3:10-12), etc...]
Rev 3 Jesus promises heaven, thrones, white robes and crowns to the overcomers.
Rev 4:4 the 24 Elders ARE in heaven (following the Lamb whithersoever he goeth) clothed in white robes with crowns sitting on thrones.
Rev 5:9 the Elders describe themselves as being redeemed by the blood of the Lamb out of every kindred tongue people and nation (this eliminates the patriarchs and Apostles theory.....all of whom were exclusively Israelites).
Yet people are confused as to the identity of this representative group? Well I for one am not the least bit confused. Debunking the 12+12 theory had clarified this issue even that much more.
The LORD said: by no means will your error of pre-trib take place, for the Dead in Christ RISE FIRST
The LORD said:
Then I saw the thrones, and those seated on them had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or its image, and had not received its mark on their foreheads or hands. And they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were complete.
This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection! The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and will reign with Him for a thousand years.
The LORD said no rapture until AFTER the Resurrection at His COMING.
You need repentance as you are divise and speak and teach error.
Pre-tribbers do not disgree that "the dead IN Christ" will be resurrected from the dead / out of their graves BEFORE the "rapture / SNATCH" occurs (for ALL members of "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY"--Eph1:20-23 WHEN [as to its existence])
No He did not say that.
You are not perceiving the phrase "the resurrection the first [adjective]" correctly.
YOU are the one making it say [/mean] "this is the first time saints will have been resurrected". It doesn't say [or mean] that.
The saints being resurrected in 20:4b are simply the last saints to have DIED [/been martyred--they are killed in the SECOND HALF] before the earthly MK commences upon Christ's "RETURN" to the earth Rev19. They are said to be "having A PART IN the resurrection the first [adjective]"... they are NOT said to be the first to have been resurrected!
The "2W" will have been resurrected from the dead (and ascend up to Heaven) at the "6th Trumpet / 2nd Woe" at a time-slot DISTINCT from when other saints will be resurrected. Your misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the adjective ('first') in 20:5&6 is blinding you to this fact... and renders your viewpoint unable to explain this blaring discrepancy.
Carefully examine your own viewpoint... as some of us can readily detect its flaws, and that are oft-repeated in many books and youtube videos out there, but that are not biblically accurate.
[you're tracked, see...... believe that.
]