No, that would be OSNGUI am glad you can add some humor to the clogged latrine!
No, that would be OSNGUI am glad you can add some humor to the clogged latrine!
OK, it appears you have trouble connecting some dots.So you have no answer about Mr. Templeton?
Where do you get the notion that it is one's assurance that keeps one saved? Is that what you think? That's my take on what you have posted.Impossible for him to have had assurance of salvation at any time because he might change his beliefs and actions sometime and thus he could never have been a believer at all?????
<sigh> No, it isn't.Very confusing??!!:
This clearly suggests that there will be no serious discussion here. I wish you were kidding. You started by using the sheep to goat theory. I merely borrowed the words instead of "saved" and "unsaved".You use John 5:24 an John 10:28 as your Scriptures: and those are some powerful verses and promises to believers! PTL! But then you go back to your sheep and goat statement again - and none of your verses even have the word "sheep" or "goat" in them at all!
Well, thanks for your generosity! However, I prefer to state what the Word of God says. Such as John 5:24 and 10:28 when discussing eternal security.But you may believe and state anything you want - that is your prerogative!
Well, thanks for a very sore tummy. Oh, and jaw as well.So we have OSNG and now PTL.
I am afraid to ask any more.
I fell foul of such of the above.
My daughter text me to say that she got straight A+ in her A, level exams and as a result got a place in a top university.
I replied with WTF.
Apparently WTF doesn't mean "Well thats fantastic" which I thought it did.
Well, they would be wrong. The verses say nothing about "before losing faith".In the above post I was referring to one interpretation of the "sin unto death" (I John 5:16,17) which says that it = that God will take the life of a true believer (that is = kill him) before he loses faith. (This is what some OSAS people teach.)
I just showed you verses where believers were removed for their sin.To be honest I respect OSAS people that take the above view because at least they are consistent with their beliefs. But I really don't like to think I serve a God that would kill me if I choose not to keep following Him!
Except one side would have clear Scripture and the other side wouldn't.You are right, it's another topic.
I believe the opposite of what you do.
But then again the conversation and beliefs would be no different from this thread.
Same argument for and against.
FreeGrace2 said:
Silly man. That's what I did. I started from Scripture. But maybe you haven't been following very closely.
In John 5:24 Jesus said those who believe (in the present tense) have (as in POSSESS) eternal life. Also in the present tense.
So, WHEN one believes, they ARE a believer, and they HAVE/POSSESS eternal life. Got it so far?
Then, in John 10:28 Jesus stated in very clear words that recipients of eternal life (check Jn 5:24 for who that is) SHALL NEVER PERISH.
There is no "man-made doctrine" in my statements, unless you just want to emphasize Jesus' humanity. Then it's correct.
But, unless you can show from Scripture some mention of:
a sheep becoming a goat,
or a saved person becoming unsaved,
or a justified person becoming unjustified,
or a regenerate person becoming unregenerate,
or a born again person becoming unborn,
you ain't got a point.
Therefore, OSNG is true.
But, humor me a bit. Thanks.
<sigh> No, it isn't.
This clearly suggests that there will be no serious discussion here. I wish you were kidding. You started by using the sheep to goat theory. I merely borrowed the words instead of "saved" and "unsaved".
In fact, John 5:24 and 10:28 prove beyond any doubt that salvation is permanent, and that from the MOMENT of saving faith in Christ.
But, as I said, humor me by proving that I am wrong by executing both verses to show how far from the truth of those verses.
Well, thanks for your generosity! However, I prefer to state what the Word of God says. Such as John 5:24 and 10:28 when discussing eternal security.
However, there's plenty more verses/passages that also teach it.
Well, that is quite an admission of such lack of discernment then.Well, I love what John 5:24 and 10:28 say: They are some of the most beautiful promises in the Word to those who are believing.
But they do not even remotely teach OSAS, nor does any other verse in the entire Bible.
Why would you wish (hope) for a latrine to be eternally secure but not believe that God keeps His word about His own children?Good bye and God bless - I am probably done on CC till at least Friday: hopefully we can keep the unclogged latrine eternally secure!![]()
Silly man. That's what I did. I started from Scripture. But maybe you haven't been following very closely.
In John 5:24 Jesus said those who believe (in the present tense) have (as in POSSESS) eternal life. Also in the present tense.
So, WHEN one believes, they ARE a believer, and they HAVE/POSSESS eternal life. Got it so far?
Then, in John 10:28 Jesus stated in very clear words that recipients of eternal life (check Jn 5:24 for who that is) SHALL NEVER PERISH.
There is no "man-made doctrine" in my statements, unless you just want to emphasize Jesus' humanity. Then it's correct.
But, unless you can show from Scripture some mention of:
a sheep becoming a goat,
or a saved person becoming unsaved,
or a justified person becoming unjustified,
or a regenerate person becoming unregenerate,
or a born again person becoming unborn,
you ain't got a point.
Therefore, OSNG is true.
But, humor me a bit. Thanks.
You're certainly free to believe in the false contrivance of men called conditional works based faith.If one takes what you say about OSAS then one cannot have assurance of salvation.
Why? Because if you quit doing good deeds and start doing some bad deeds, then OSAS people will look at you and say you were never born again to start with. Thus you need to keep doing enough good deeds so people are convinced you are saved. I tell you living that way will not give you much assurance of salvation!
If you are going to believe in OSAS then believe in it all the way and accept what it means. It means simply that once a person has been truly born again, then nothing they do or don't do can ever make them lose their salvation. That means that if a truly born again person sins like Hitler he will still go to heaven. Even if he curses and swears and tells God he doesn't want to go to heaven, he will still go to heaven.
If you are going to believe in OSAS, but don't want to believe the previous paragraph you have two basic options:
(1) Teach that the believer no longer has a free will (or a moral capability to deny God) and thus cannot/will not choose to not believe
(2) Teach that God will chasten and discipline the believer who is faltering, but if necessary will kill him (the sin unto death) before he becomes an unbeliever
Man made doctrine of eternal irrevocable salvation?Now there you got something exactly right: "the Bible clearly teaches the eternal security of the believer".
Just do not add any of man's ideas to that - - - such as an unbeliever has eternal security if he has at some previous time been born again . . .or don't turn eternal security into the manmade doctrine of OSAS
That would be because of your preconceived bias then. It is as clear as the day. Jesus made the point that recipients of eternal life shall never perish.I don’t see John 10:28 as a proof text for OSAS.
No, it's NOT important, and I'll tell you why. v.27 has NO wording that would suggest listening and obeying are requirements for receiving eternal life.I think it is important to look at the preceding verses in John 10:26-27 to see how the Lord holds us accountable in our relationship with Him.
Once His sheep, always His sheep.I understand that some who believe in OSAS state that if a sheep is no longer following Christ, that means they believe they were never a true sheep to begin with.
Nope. John 10:14 isn't a requirement for salvation. Hearing His voice is how one believes; hearing the gospel per Rom 10.26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. (So the sheep of Christ believe in Him)
27 MY SHEEP hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: (the sheep also hear His voice and follow Him)
28 And I give unto them (who is this “them”? It is the same sheep who believe in Jesus, hear His voice and follow Him) eternal life (1st promise); and they shall never perish (2nd promise), neither shall any man pluckthem out of my hand (3rd promise).
29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father’s hand.These three promises are given, as clearly shown, to the sheep who:
believe in Him
know Him (John 10:14)
hear His voice
follow Him
That is correct, because "no one" means "no person". So, if you are a "person" even you cannot undo what God has done for you.So, the OSAS doctrine is that God is greater than all and "no man" can pluck us out of his hand. According to this doctrine "No man" would include us and our own will.
This is heretical. Salvation is permanent from the moment of belief in Christ for salvation.As Christians, we have to know Him, hear His voice, and follow Him as our salvation is conditional.
Not by one who has already believed and been given that gift. See the 5 things that God does for every believer and try to prove that any of them can be undone.It is a free gift that can be rejected.
What do you mean by "fall out of the Spirit of God". God's Holy Spirit is IN us. How does one "fall out" of the Spirit? Scripture, please.I believe it possible for a born again Christian to fall out of the Spirit of God, and then continue on rejecting the Lord unto death.
Calvinists who believe any of this are just very confused. Choosing against God's will doesn't mean that the person "prevails over God's will" as if more powerful than God. That is just silly.Calvinists/Reformed perhaps don't see the possibility of God laying down two alternatives, pointing out the eternal and unchangeable consequences of each, and giving a person the choice, especially when God's will favors one alternative and abhors the other.
Calvinists argue that if a person can possibly choose the alternative that God does not wish, then that person's will can prevail over God's will, so the will of that person is the sovereign will, and God's will is subject to that person's own will.
Certainly you are free to believe whatever you want. But you're going to have to prove your belief from Scripture. The single condition for salvation is believing in Christ for it. Acts 16:31.I see why you mention John 5:24. The natural question that follows is, “what does it mean to believe in Jesus?” To me, salvation is conditional. I think the believer must continue to repent when he/she falls from grace, as I do not think God's grace is irresistible.
Yes, that is true. Jesus said that about the second soil in Luke 8:13. So what? Charles Templeton mentored a young Billy Graham. CT left the faith over a misunderstanding of something in the OT. He was still a child of God.I do think that a Christian can stop believing in Jesus at anytime throughout the course of their life.
This passage is parallel to 2 others; 1 Cor 6 and Eph 5. This says nothing about losing salvation. In fact, "inheriting the kingdom of God" refers to having reward in the kingdom.19Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, cdivisions, 21envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
No, he never believed. You are only supposing or presuming.There is of course the case of Judas, a born again follower losing his salvation.
This doesn't prove anything, and certainly not salvation. Are you not aware that the false prophet in the Tribulation will perform miracles? An unsaved person can cast out demons. Satan can simply order such a demon out when a false teacher/prophet makes the command. What better way to convince a crowd that a false teacher is legit than by performing miracles.He was given the power to cast out devils in the sixth chapter of Mark. 7 And He (Jesus) called unto him the twelve (which obviously include Judas), and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them POWER over unclean spirits (so Judas Iscariot was given power over unclean Spirits);
I love this one. luke uses the exact same words to describe the crowd who responded to Philip's preaching as Simon.There is also the case of Simon the Sorcerer.
Are you not aware that there are NO verses in the Bible that mention anyone losing salvation?Some Arminians point out this example to demonstrate the possibility of salvation being lost. Although there is no mention of Simon losing his salvation,
Correct.Acts 8:12 But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.13 Then SIMON HIMSELF BELIEVED ALSO: and when he was BAPTIZED, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done.
The information above, which Luke writes down for us in Acts, is that Simon believed and was baptized. That will absolutely make the reader understand Simon was saved. Or else Luke would have totally confused us with his information about Simon.
No it doesn't mean that at all. Do you really believe that every believer's heart is "only right" all the time? Every time a believer sins, their heart is NOT right.Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Peter tells Simon that he is on the way to perdition and that he needs to repent so that God can forgive him for his wicked acts. Peter tells Simon that his heart is not right, and of course that means he couldn’t have been “saved” (spiritually alive) during this particular time.
No one is saved by repentance. Peter was telling Simon to get right with the Lord. This is an issue of fellowship, not relationship.Acts 8:20 But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money.21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.24 Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me.
Calvinists/reformed are confused. Man IS totally depraved. But that doesn't mean he can't respond to the gospel. That's where the Calvinists go off the rail.I reject all of TULIP but understand why many of my fellow Christians accept those doctrines. It is my view that man is depraved, not totally depraved. Total depravity is of course the foundational doctrine upon which the other five points of Calvinism stand.
That's exactly what I am saying to you it is against all scripture to believe the church is saved by works or deeds, we are saved by grace. Therefore these who do gain an inheritance because of deeds cannot be the church.Hi Evmur,
I understand dispensationalism, and the two views that are now widely held. Some still hold to the old classical view although not many now.
But I am pointing out your error in your understanding of a parable. That the sheep are saved by their deeds therefore their own merit. This goes against scriptural teaching.
Salvation has always been by grace through faith.. And it doesn't mater what your eschatology is. You can be A, Pre or post millennial is doesn't matter.
That is trueAmen
The sheep were not saved by their deeds. They were saved by the Deed of Christ.
That's exactly what I am saying to you it is against all scripture to believe the church is saved by works or deeds, we are saved by grace. Therefore these who do gain an inheritance because of deeds cannot be the church.
Evangelicals have dodged this question for too long.
I thought you was Charismatic. I am Pentecostal. The reason why Spurgeon is important to me is because he has the theology and doctrines that Pentecostals and Charismatics need so badly. Revelation has moved on since Spurgeon's day but God never changes, if the Charismatics ever got a firm grip on the old theology and applied those doctrine to what God is doing today it would cut out all the nonsense and bad practises that have brought shame on the movement.
yepThat is true
Never-the-less we must hear the word of God on the matter.
Come o blessed of My Father inherit the kingdom prepare for you from the foundation of the world for...
... FOR I was hungry and you gave Me food, I was thirsty and you gave Me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed Me, I was naked and you clothed Me, I was sick and you visited Me, I was in prison and you visited Me.
Good morning,Could the words It's Impossible be Interpreted as If It were possible because this sounds like only a Christian could fall away and the bible says that the the seed Is Incorruptible so then If a born again person that has all those things listed In Hebrews could fall away wouldn't that mean that the Incorruptible seed could become corrupted?
Lol…Calvinists redefine “works” to suit their doctrine.Keep ignoring the clear teaching of the New Testament at your own peril. My hands are clean—I've sounded the warning.