You keep raising up this straw man of two returns of Christ when it has already been explained that there is only one Second Coming of Christ to earth. You can call it a "return" if you wish. But Christ does NOT return to earth at the Resurrection/Rapture. He does come for His saints, whether you wish to believe that or not.You also added to Scripture which is forbidden including you stating there are two(2) Returns of the Lord.
II Thessalonians 1 shows that Jesus returns and gives the church rest while at the same time executing vengence on them that know not God.
Typically, pre-trib is assumed and other scriptures are explained around it.
Thanks, that's really good reply. If you don't mind me asking; what denomination are you, or were you raised with, because it sounds very similar to what i heard in Anglican church and school ? Although there are some differences (i think) eg. i seem to remember being taught about the Ascension of the Saints meaning us believers, and that different parts of the Bible (although all the teachings are valuable) is written for different people in different times, such as Revelation being written with a more OT mindset more for Jews and not something we need to worry about too much. That's why in an earlier post i said i think i may have been taught some kind of "pre-trib" although it wasn't called that. I don't want to get too bogged down in all this, just trying to figure out if what i was taught (or my understanding of what i was taught) is scriptural or not but, as you kind of implied, reading right through the NT again is probably the best way to go about it.
^ At the moment "our Rapture" takes place, ALL believers are "CAUGHT UP / SNATCHED"... and there remains ONLY the "unsaved" on the earth. ZERO "believers" will be left behind! NONE.
But FOLLOWING "our Rapture" many people will be coming to faith (NOT ALL will--Paul, in 2Th1&2 tells of the TWO contrasting "beliefs" people WILL BE coming to FOLLOWING "our Rapture / Departure," when they find themselves IN the Trib).
Some of those "of Israel" will be among the first to realize the Truth, will come to Christ in faith, and it is THEY who go on to DO the "INVITING TO" the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom age (doing the "INVITING" in and during the Trib years, FOLLOWING "our Rapture"--Matt24:14/26:13, for example, as well as Matt22:9-14, for another example...).
God's wrath comes when the trib is over not during it. It's Satan's wrath during that time when he is overcoming the saints and killing them. Also, God can pour his wrath out and not accidentally hit the good guys. Howver, when it's time for God's wrath, his people will be raptured and immortal and in the clouds.
^ Again, many people will be coming to faith FOLLOWING "our Rapture" (Jesus never promised to "harpazo" THEM out of [ek] the world--The "RAPTURE / SNATCH / CAUGHT UP / harpazo [G726]" pertains SOLELY TO "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" [Eph1:20-23 WHEN (as to its existence)] who ALONE was promised this!!--See again the IDENTITY of the "A CHASTE VIRGIN [SINGULAR]" whom Paul said he is tasked to "PRESENT" [after having been "betrothed"] to ONE HUSBAND, as stated in 2Cor11:2<--how so??)
[whereas "the 12" were told they will "sit on twelve thrones, judgING the twelve tribes of Israel" --Matt19:28 (see M25:31-34 for its TIMING) / Lk22:30 (etc)]
Here is a simple graphical example of the beliefs.
![]()
It is not Christ honoring if we attack and belittle each other when we study The Word together. That is not how The Spirit works.
"Then the kings of the earth, the princes, the generals, the rich, the mighty, and everyone else, both slave and free, hid in caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They called to the mountains and the rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can withstand it?” - Revelation 6:15-17
Clearly, the wrath of God is early on, right there in Revelation 6. This is not "Satan's wrath."
The Seal Judgements are followed by the Trumpet Judgements which are followed by the Bowl Judgements. This during the 7 years of tribulation. God's word is truth.
![]()
LOL, satan persecutes his church? or are you thinking there is no person(s) saved after those in the rapture are gone? FYI we are hated already today. Just as Noah was and the Jews Yet God saved them did HE not?
You keep raising up this straw man of two returns of Christ when it has already been explained that there is only one Second Coming of Christ to earth. You can call it a "return" if you wish. But Christ does NOT return to earth at the Resurrection/Rapture. He does come for His saints, whether you wish to believe that or not.
Though not expressed in the same exact way that we cover the subject today, there are at least a couple of sources I've posted about in past posts, who at least DISTINGUISHED the time of our Rapture to that of Christ's Second Coming to the earth:
John Gill (1748 Commentary) said:
"....here Christ will stop and will be visible to all, and as easily discerned by all, good and bad, as the body of the sun at noon-day; as yet He will not descend on earth, because it is not fit to receive Him; but when that and its works are burnt up, and it is purged and purified by fire, and become a new earth, He'll descend upon it, and dwell with his saints in it: and this suggests another reason why He'll stay in the air, and His saints shall meet Him there, and whom He'll take up with Him into the third heaven, till the general conflagration and burning of the world is over, and to preserve them from it...."
Morgan Edwards (in 1744... and then published it again in 1788):
"II. The distance between the first and second resurrection will be somewhat more than a thousand years.
"I say, somewhat more-, because the dead saints will be raised, and the living changed at Christ's "appearing in the air" (Thess. 4:17); and this will be about three years and a half before the millennium, as we shall see hereafter: but will he and they abide in the air all that time? No: they will ascend to paradise, or to some one of those many "mansions in the father's house" (John 14:2), and disappear during the fore said period of time. The design of this retreat and disappearing will be to judge the risen and changed saints; for "now the time is come that judgment must begin," and that will be "at the house of God" (IPet. iv. 17) . . . (p. 7; The spelling of all Edwards quotes have been modernized.)"
Thomas Ice further explains:
"Edwards clearly separates the rapture from the second coming by three and a half years. He uses modern pretrib rapture verses (1 Thess. 4:17 and John 14:2) to describe the rapture."
Darby being the first?? I don't believe the people purporting such a thing.
Consider the scope of this verse:
Revelation 1:
7 Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.
Just/Only Israel?
Kinda doubt it...
As the bulk of it IS describing the "future, specific, LIMITED time-period" [i.e. the "7 yrs"] leading UP TO His Second Coming to the earth [andFOLLOWS "our Rapture" (Rapture of the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY)], many people will be coming to faith IN / DURING / WITHIN that time period (none of "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" will be existing on the earth during those 7 years)
Though not expressed in the same exact way that we cover the subject today, there are at least a couple of sources I've posted about in past posts, who at least DISTINGUISHED the time of our Rapture to that of Christ's Second Coming to the earth:
John Gill (1748 Commentary) said:
"....here Christ will stop and will be visible to all, and as easily discerned by all, good and bad, as the body of the sun at noon-day; as yet He will not descend on earth, because it is not fit to receive Him; but when that and its works are burnt up, and it is purged and purified by fire, and become a new earth, He'll descend upon it, and dwell with his saints in it: and this suggests another reason why He'll stay in the air, and His saints shall meet Him there, and whom He'll take up with Him into the third heaven, till the general conflagration and burning of the world is over, and to preserve them from it...."
Morgan Edwards (in 1744... and then published it again in 1788):
"II. The distance between the first and second resurrection will be somewhat more than a thousand years.
"I say, somewhat more-, because the dead saints will be raised, and the living changed at Christ's "appearing in the air" (Thess. 4:17); and this will be about three years and a half before the millennium, as we shall see hereafter: but will he and they abide in the air all that time? No: they will ascend to paradise, or to some one of those many "mansions in the father's house" (John 14:2), and disappear during the fore said period of time. The design of this retreat and disappearing will be to judge the risen and changed saints; for "now the time is come that judgment must begin," and that will be "at the house of God" (IPet. iv. 17) . . . (p. 7; The spelling of all Edwards quotes have been modernized.)"
Thomas Ice further explains:
"Edwards clearly separates the rapture from the second coming by three and a half years. He uses modern pretrib rapture verses (1 Thess. 4:17 and John 14:2) to describe the rapture."
Darby being the first?? I don't believe the people purporting such a thing.
A pre millennial rapture was the clear teaching of the first century and the first few hundred years and it revived again after dark ages.
The timing of the rapture itself related to the tribulation might not have been written about but it is not so surprising that it would be explored more thoroughly after the reformation and insights gleaned since that entire subject material is clouded in mystery and no one knows for sure about all those finer details.
To suggest that the pre millennial view of the rapture is new is to not have read Church history documents. Once we concede that pre millennial rapture was understood by many early church writers then we are not so shocked that they did not have the timing of the tribulation well documented, nor did they teach much about it once other issues took center stage such as the deity of Christ.
They may have seen a pre trib rapture in the scriptures but just did not write about it or such writings did not survive. They did write about a pre millennial rapture and literal 1000 year reign before a final new earth and this should not be left out of the discussion as to what they understood the first 300 -500 years of the church.
We do not know what all the early bible teachers of the first several hundred years taught about everything. We only know what some, who's writings have survived taught. This is not exhaustive and people should remember this. I am sure that much more writings did not survive than did. MUCH MUCH MORE. Who knows what teachings about the book of Revelation were popular but were lost. Centuries of popular teachings could have risen and been lost and risen again and lost again. Generations died and their writings were lost and then the dark ages buried them in obscurity. The bible gets back in circulation and old truths get rediscovered.
It is no more incredible for Darby and others with him, (there were quite a few who contributed to the research) to have rediscovered a possible interpreation in scriptures that was once known by select groups of ancient Christians as it was for Luther, and other like him to rediscover other theology that was once known by ancient bible readers but had been buried in obscurity by the long reign of catholic ecclesiastics and their control over who was a scholar and who was not.
Saying that the pre tribulation interpretation was birthed out of a motivation to make money does not make any sense and is just another conspiracy theory that has no basis if fact. There is a market for prophetic books but the validity of an interpretation relies on hermeneutics not on book sales. The popularity of the pre tribulation interpretation can be traced to the superior hermeneutics of those who do a good job of presenting their case. As long as they continue to do so the interpretation will continue to have a high degree of acceptance among intellectually honest bible students.
Those who wish to present a different interpretation will need to present a superior hermeneutic and if they do that view will also have a high degree of acceptance. Thus the post trib pre millennial view is also a popular view. These two pre millennial views are the most accepted because they are the most sound hermeneutic. They are probably both imperfect and therefore will not be clarified until the Lord comes again and we no longer see in part.
To reveal any errors in the pretrib view one must exegete the verses involved not point out what year they became popular. Any post trib view that starts their hermeneutic presentation by discussing what century pre trib became popular is wasting his platform because that is not one of the rules of hermeneutics. You cannot interpret scripture text by applying a rule of when it became popular in the church. Luther rediscovered things in the scriptures that they wanted to kill him over. We don't discount possible interpretation of mysterious end time prophecy scriptures because they were not discussed much before in the past.
It is not surprising that the pentecostal movement swept the world in the early 20th century having not been discussed much by the reformers after the dark ages either. We humans take centuries to come out of our traditions of ignorance and we often read the scriptures with blinders of these traditions of bad interpretations.
We have a habit of burning at the stack those that discover truths in the scripture. What's next?
Where is the scripture that expressly states the church will go through the Great Tribulation?