Warning to Christians: Totally Refuse COVID Vaccines
- Thread starter Nehemiah6
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Presumptuous assumptions. So let me set you straight. I have a Master of Science degree in Dairy Science from a leading university in the USA. And my thesis was in the field of food microbiology. Then I was the manager of Quality Control for a cheese manufacturing company for 10 years, and running a lab with several technicians testing for bacteria and viruses daily. I even developed a rapid test for the detection of Staph in food samples!
But the real issue which you have to deal with is your vicious and unfounded attacks on those who are exposing the COVID Conspiracy and the vaccine hoax (a Satanic agenda). When a Christian calls truth propaganda and propaganda truth, then there is a very serious spiritual issue.
But the real issue which you have to deal with is your vicious and unfounded attacks on those who are exposing the COVID Conspiracy and the vaccine hoax (a Satanic agenda). When a Christian calls truth propaganda and propaganda truth, then there is a very serious spiritual issue.
-
2
-
1
-
1
- Show all
People don't need anything man-made if they follow God's recipe.
All we need is a good properly working immune system - which is what God intended.
The only "medicine" God intended for us is that which is in a [truly] 'natural' form.
There are 'natural' antibiotics.
All of the things we (humans) have gotten vaccinations for happened because we (humans) "went against" the "proper way" that God intended for us.
I am not for [just] letting people die; however, I am for utilizing the 'natural' remedies that God provided for us to use - that which is based on good health - not that which is unnatural and "quick-fix" for only relieving symptoms while causing other problems instead of providing "real healing" by natural means.
These so-called "vaccines" do not utilize the proper 'natural' mechanisms that God provided in our immune system - but rather - do harm to it.
All we need is a good properly working immune system - which is what God intended.
The only "medicine" God intended for us is that which is in a [truly] 'natural' form.
There are 'natural' antibiotics.
All of the things we (humans) have gotten vaccinations for happened because we (humans) "went against" the "proper way" that God intended for us.
I am not for [just] letting people die; however, I am for utilizing the 'natural' remedies that God provided for us to use - that which is based on good health - not that which is unnatural and "quick-fix" for only relieving symptoms while causing other problems instead of providing "real healing" by natural means.
These so-called "vaccines" do not utilize the proper 'natural' mechanisms that God provided in our immune system - but rather - do harm to it.
-
1
- Show all
COVID: The Wrecking Ball To Scientific Integrity
Most Americans have at least until now maintained faith in the integrity of our scientific establishment. But COVID-19 and the scientific malfeasance it has spawned may be the wrecking ball that tears down even that pillar of faith.
The litany of scientific sins committed in the name of COVID-19 fear-mongering includes but is not limited to the publishing of false data in a leading medical journal, the publication of intentionally misleading articles masking the laboratory origins of the SARS-2 coronavirus and the subsequent deliberate withholding of evidence to the contrary, the smearing of lauded scientists who have questioned the severity of COVID-19 and/or the treatability of the disease, and the arrogance of medical authorities such as Robert Fauci that now-validated criticism of him and the official COVID-19 narrative is “anti-science”.
The end result of all this is not merely academic, for hundreds of thousands of lives may have been lost and children not been born due to the scientific malfeasance.
One of the most egregious scientific acts was the article in Lancet in May of 2020—just when COVID-19 was ramping up—that argued that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, sold as Plaquenil) was both ineffective and dangerous in treating COVID-19 symptoms.[1]
This contradicted the fact that HCQ had been sold safely for decades to millions of people over-the-counter in many nations for anti-malarial and other purposes and that leading virologists were already using it effectively to treat early COVID-19 symptoms. By the time the bogus study was retracted, its results had already been trumpeted by the mainstream media and by leading health officials in their attacks on HCQ. Despite later meta-analyses indicating some treatment efficacy in the early stages of COVID,[2] the damage had already been inflicted. HCQ was pulled off the market in many nations and is still banned for treating COIVD-19 in many, such as Australia.
Equally damaging were the outrageous predictions of over 500,000 dead Britons and two million Americans due to COVID-19 by epidemiologist Neil Ferguson of Imperial College in London, who back-pedaled his predictions after his conclusion led to the draconian lockdowns that have so greatly damaged Western society.[3]
By contrast, an important study disputing the official COVID-19 narrative, such as Briand’s epidemiological one in the Johns Hopkins News-Letter that questioned the lethality and accuracy of COVID-19 statistics[4], was retracted by the university in an unprecedented act of scientific censorship.
Lancet later figured in another important repugnant scientific action—the publication of a letter signed by over two dozen scientists condemning speculation that the Wuhan version of the SARS coronavirus might have been created in a laboratory.[5] It was surreptitiously written by Peter Daszak, the very scientist conducting dangerous gain-of-function viral research that was banned in the United States and who was attempting to create synthetically souped-up versions of the coronavirus—in Wuhan itself...
Contrary to what much of the Western public believes, a large number of top medical professionals have questioned the severity of COVID-19, the advisability of lockdowns and masks, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines, and restrictions on drugs such as HCQ and Ivermectin as treatments. Almost 60,000 medical practitioners and researchers have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, which rejects lockdowns and masks in favor tried-and-true herd immunity.[8]...
These prominent scientists and many others have been subjected to a litany of slanders and smears including monikers such as “witch-doctors” and “pseudoscientists”, removal from YouTube and other social media, misleading “fact-checking”, and attacks on Wikipedia sites in some cases. Some scientists have come to their defense,[9] but even some of those who rallied in public defense of these individuals have been smeared.
While most of the slander in the media has come from nonscientists in the media, academic colleagues and medical associations have occasionally joined in, as in the case of Yale faculty condemnation of Risch for his HCQ stand.[10]
But what is most disturbing is the larger scientific community’s deafening silence in defense of the scientists who opposed the official COVID-19 narrative.
Even more insidious is the notion that anyone who disagrees with the official COVID-19 narrative and policies is somehow “anti-science”. This arrogant view has been promulgated by Anthony Fauci on several occasions,[11] yet the great founders of modern science including Galileo, Descartes, and Newton emphasized the need for skepticism and humility in scientific thought.
Genuine scientists recognize that scientific orthodoxy is constantly being revised, that theories can never be proven, and scientific debate should never be silenced.
Most of the renowned scientists being denigrated are not being done so because of faulty data—after all, who can deny the low-lethality of COVID-19 when only one sailor of ~6000 on the USS Roosevelt presumably exposed to the coronavirus died or that only 14 of over 3700 mostly elderly passengers and crew members on the Diamond Princess line died, in both cases in confined spaces with minimal treatments available. These two examples represent to date the only controlled evidence of COVID-19 lethality, but there is additional solid evidence that Ioannides and others have marshalled to support the low mortality threat of COVID-19...
What explains the failure of scientists to stand up to the scientific bullying and quackery? Part of it may be timidity—after all, who dares question the grand poobahs at NIH like Dr. Fauci when to do so would almost certainly mean losing one’s scientific funding? Part of it may be the herd mentality, with our present graduate and postgraduate training with their long mentorships failing to develop truly rebellious and revolutionary scientific thinkers.
Part of it is the effect of big money spent on science research —over $500 billion in the U.S. alone, mostly from industry with strings attached. And part of it may be that way too many scientists nowadays are simply dishonest, self-promoting, and agenda-driven—far beyond the few percent that are officially accused of fraud...
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-the-wrecking-ball-to-scientific-integrity/
Most Americans have at least until now maintained faith in the integrity of our scientific establishment. But COVID-19 and the scientific malfeasance it has spawned may be the wrecking ball that tears down even that pillar of faith.
The litany of scientific sins committed in the name of COVID-19 fear-mongering includes but is not limited to the publishing of false data in a leading medical journal, the publication of intentionally misleading articles masking the laboratory origins of the SARS-2 coronavirus and the subsequent deliberate withholding of evidence to the contrary, the smearing of lauded scientists who have questioned the severity of COVID-19 and/or the treatability of the disease, and the arrogance of medical authorities such as Robert Fauci that now-validated criticism of him and the official COVID-19 narrative is “anti-science”.
The end result of all this is not merely academic, for hundreds of thousands of lives may have been lost and children not been born due to the scientific malfeasance.
One of the most egregious scientific acts was the article in Lancet in May of 2020—just when COVID-19 was ramping up—that argued that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, sold as Plaquenil) was both ineffective and dangerous in treating COVID-19 symptoms.[1]
This contradicted the fact that HCQ had been sold safely for decades to millions of people over-the-counter in many nations for anti-malarial and other purposes and that leading virologists were already using it effectively to treat early COVID-19 symptoms. By the time the bogus study was retracted, its results had already been trumpeted by the mainstream media and by leading health officials in their attacks on HCQ. Despite later meta-analyses indicating some treatment efficacy in the early stages of COVID,[2] the damage had already been inflicted. HCQ was pulled off the market in many nations and is still banned for treating COIVD-19 in many, such as Australia.
Equally damaging were the outrageous predictions of over 500,000 dead Britons and two million Americans due to COVID-19 by epidemiologist Neil Ferguson of Imperial College in London, who back-pedaled his predictions after his conclusion led to the draconian lockdowns that have so greatly damaged Western society.[3]
By contrast, an important study disputing the official COVID-19 narrative, such as Briand’s epidemiological one in the Johns Hopkins News-Letter that questioned the lethality and accuracy of COVID-19 statistics[4], was retracted by the university in an unprecedented act of scientific censorship.
Lancet later figured in another important repugnant scientific action—the publication of a letter signed by over two dozen scientists condemning speculation that the Wuhan version of the SARS coronavirus might have been created in a laboratory.[5] It was surreptitiously written by Peter Daszak, the very scientist conducting dangerous gain-of-function viral research that was banned in the United States and who was attempting to create synthetically souped-up versions of the coronavirus—in Wuhan itself...
Contrary to what much of the Western public believes, a large number of top medical professionals have questioned the severity of COVID-19, the advisability of lockdowns and masks, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines, and restrictions on drugs such as HCQ and Ivermectin as treatments. Almost 60,000 medical practitioners and researchers have signed the Great Barrington Declaration, which rejects lockdowns and masks in favor tried-and-true herd immunity.[8]...
These prominent scientists and many others have been subjected to a litany of slanders and smears including monikers such as “witch-doctors” and “pseudoscientists”, removal from YouTube and other social media, misleading “fact-checking”, and attacks on Wikipedia sites in some cases. Some scientists have come to their defense,[9] but even some of those who rallied in public defense of these individuals have been smeared.
While most of the slander in the media has come from nonscientists in the media, academic colleagues and medical associations have occasionally joined in, as in the case of Yale faculty condemnation of Risch for his HCQ stand.[10]
But what is most disturbing is the larger scientific community’s deafening silence in defense of the scientists who opposed the official COVID-19 narrative.
Even more insidious is the notion that anyone who disagrees with the official COVID-19 narrative and policies is somehow “anti-science”. This arrogant view has been promulgated by Anthony Fauci on several occasions,[11] yet the great founders of modern science including Galileo, Descartes, and Newton emphasized the need for skepticism and humility in scientific thought.
Genuine scientists recognize that scientific orthodoxy is constantly being revised, that theories can never be proven, and scientific debate should never be silenced.
Most of the renowned scientists being denigrated are not being done so because of faulty data—after all, who can deny the low-lethality of COVID-19 when only one sailor of ~6000 on the USS Roosevelt presumably exposed to the coronavirus died or that only 14 of over 3700 mostly elderly passengers and crew members on the Diamond Princess line died, in both cases in confined spaces with minimal treatments available. These two examples represent to date the only controlled evidence of COVID-19 lethality, but there is additional solid evidence that Ioannides and others have marshalled to support the low mortality threat of COVID-19...
What explains the failure of scientists to stand up to the scientific bullying and quackery? Part of it may be timidity—after all, who dares question the grand poobahs at NIH like Dr. Fauci when to do so would almost certainly mean losing one’s scientific funding? Part of it may be the herd mentality, with our present graduate and postgraduate training with their long mentorships failing to develop truly rebellious and revolutionary scientific thinkers.
Part of it is the effect of big money spent on science research —over $500 billion in the U.S. alone, mostly from industry with strings attached. And part of it may be that way too many scientists nowadays are simply dishonest, self-promoting, and agenda-driven—far beyond the few percent that are officially accused of fraud...
https://principia-scientific.com/covid-the-wrecking-ball-to-scientific-integrity/
-
2
- Show all
I work since over 30 years in hospital. And I can tell you they dont know. Ask a surgeon about diabetic matters.
Sometimes you have 3 doctors with 4 meanings.
I would not trust to much in a doctors meaning.
Taking vaccine is always a risk. Driving a car is also a risk.
If you can safe life, you would risk something or not.
No vaccine in germany comes without proofing to the market.
In matter of an virus, where nobody knows how dangerous it will be, you cant make long time Again, where have you the numbers from? Till today much more people dies because of Covidinfection then from the vaccine.
And where i said it is safe? Biontec is 65% effectiv to the delta Mutation. But thats better then 0%.
In germany must everybody informed about the risks, before he can get the vaccine.
In your case you maby right. But there are millions of people who have an much higher risk to Die ore have serious health problems trough Covid then you.
Is your thinking not a little bit selfish?
Btw, maby you have without knowing an desease or an Disposition in you which makes the risk much higher then you imagine?
Sometimes you have 3 doctors with 4 meanings.
I would not trust to much in a doctors meaning.
Taking vaccine is always a risk. Driving a car is also a risk.
If you can safe life, you would risk something or not.
No vaccine in germany comes without proofing to the market.
In matter of an virus, where nobody knows how dangerous it will be, you cant make long time Again, where have you the numbers from? Till today much more people dies because of Covidinfection then from the vaccine.
And where i said it is safe? Biontec is 65% effectiv to the delta Mutation. But thats better then 0%.
In germany must everybody informed about the risks, before he can get the vaccine.
In your case you maby right. But there are millions of people who have an much higher risk to Die ore have serious health problems trough Covid then you.
Is your thinking not a little bit selfish?
Btw, maby you have without knowing an desease or an Disposition in you which makes the risk much higher then you imagine?
Then you have no idea about vaccines.
And as I said, the most people in this world have simply not the money for to get the natural resources.
Will you go 200 years back and let the people die. If they are not strong enough, it is their fault.
Is it not also our heavenly father who gives the knowledge to produce medicine, antibiotics, vaccines?
And as I said, the most people in this world have simply not the money for to get the natural resources.
Will you go 200 years back and let the people die. If they are not strong enough, it is their fault.
Is it not also our heavenly father who gives the knowledge to produce medicine, antibiotics, vaccines?
How is my thinking selfish?
I have two doctors advising me not to take the vaccine... Yet u would still rather vax me without knowing anything about my health...
I call your thinking Satanic...
Only Satan's agents would accept vaccine murder and push them onto people as safe and effective
I have two doctors advising me not to take the vaccine... Yet u would still rather vax me without knowing anything about my health...
I call your thinking Satanic...
Only Satan's agents would accept vaccine murder and push them onto people as safe and effective
-
1
- Show all
Here is proof from just one Dr. He explains very well what the spike protein is doing in your body as we speak. Maybe this will convince you and others not to take any more of these toxins in "boosters". Listen to what he says, and THEN form an opinion. This guy, and countless other Drs warning about the vaccine gain NOTHING by saying this. In fact, they face danger for stating this information:
https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2021/07/13/horrifying-news-8-minutes/
https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2021/07/13/horrifying-news-8-minutes/
-
3
- Show all
Actually...the oral polio vaccine can cause and spread polio:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnew...-cases-now-caused-vaccine-wild-virus-67287290
Also, look up the Cutter Incident.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnew...-cases-now-caused-vaccine-wild-virus-67287290
Also, look up the Cutter Incident.
-
2
- Show all
Maby you should read my post again. I have never said it is safe and effective. It is a risk like everything. And even 65% protection is better then 0%.
Selfish is if somemone thinks i will not get it to 99,8%, what cares me the others.
What you call me thinkind satanic ?
Btw, again my question where you have the numbers 20000 death in europe because of vaccine?
Selfish is if somemone thinks i will not get it to 99,8%, what cares me the others.
What you call me thinkind satanic ?
Btw, again my question where you have the numbers 20000 death in europe because of vaccine?
The point I made was that it is being promoted as safe and effective... A lie by the government's and media... We should be told of the risks and we shouldn't be forced to take such a risk
Your calling me selfish but you know nothing about my medical history...
The vaccine is a choice for me and my doctors. Not for you or the media or the government
Because u support vaccines being forced on people like me whose physicians have advised not to take.
God gave us the right to choose what goes into our bodies...
The evil one works to take away that God given right...
I don't think u answered any of my questions either. Besides, it won't change your rigid attitude...
In a way I can actually understand your bias because you are connected to the industry. But your acceptance of vaccine murderes and support of forcing an experimental syringe onto everyone still disgusts me...
Medication is a decision for my doctors and I... No one else... Any one who wants to intrude is abetting evil
Your calling me selfish but you know nothing about my medical history...
The vaccine is a choice for me and my doctors. Not for you or the media or the government
Because u support vaccines being forced on people like me whose physicians have advised not to take.
God gave us the right to choose what goes into our bodies...
The evil one works to take away that God given right...
I don't think u answered any of my questions either. Besides, it won't change your rigid attitude...
In a way I can actually understand your bias because you are connected to the industry. But your acceptance of vaccine murderes and support of forcing an experimental syringe onto everyone still disgusts me...
Medication is a decision for my doctors and I... No one else... Any one who wants to intrude is abetting evil
In Australia
Under 1,000 people died WITH covid including people in car accidents, suicides and other deaths...
The average age of deaths is over 85yo exceeding life expectancy.
According to the Therapeutic Goods Australia (TGA), there have been over 10 millions doses of the experimental syringe administrated....
There have been over 41,000 reports of adverse reactions after taking the needle and 400 deaths...
The TGA only links 6 deaths to the syringe which is total rubbish...
Same protocol should be used as with covid... They died after the vax, end of story.
Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) is one of the most common side effects...
Right now there are 25 people in hospital and 6 in ICU with TTS after receiving the experimental needle...
Thats more hospitalizations than covid at the moment...
Only a small percentage are being reported.
You can safely multiply by 10 and add another zero to those numbers
The experimental needle is clearly doing more damage here than covid... And with another 40 million doses required to vax the nation, its going to get worse... Much much worse
Link to the TGA
Under 1,000 people died WITH covid including people in car accidents, suicides and other deaths...
The average age of deaths is over 85yo exceeding life expectancy.
According to the Therapeutic Goods Australia (TGA), there have been over 10 millions doses of the experimental syringe administrated....
There have been over 41,000 reports of adverse reactions after taking the needle and 400 deaths...
The TGA only links 6 deaths to the syringe which is total rubbish...
Same protocol should be used as with covid... They died after the vax, end of story.
Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) is one of the most common side effects...
Right now there are 25 people in hospital and 6 in ICU with TTS after receiving the experimental needle...
Thats more hospitalizations than covid at the moment...
Only a small percentage are being reported.
You can safely multiply by 10 and add another zero to those numbers
The experimental needle is clearly doing more damage here than covid... And with another 40 million doses required to vax the nation, its going to get worse... Much much worse
Link to the TGA
Maby you should read my post again. I have never said it is safe and effective. It is a risk like everything. And even 65% protection is better then 0%.
Selfish is if somemone thinks i will not get it to 99,8%, what cares me the others.
What you call me thinkind satanic ?
Btw, again my question where you have the numbers 20000 death in europe because of vaccine?
Selfish is if somemone thinks i will not get it to 99,8%, what cares me the others.
What you call me thinkind satanic ?
Btw, again my question where you have the numbers 20000 death in europe because of vaccine?
Hannity eviscerates Fauci over new mask mandate considerations: 'So now we're supposed to ignore the science?'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-fauci-new-mask-mandate
"Two months ago, it was Joe Biden who proudly declared a policy of ‘vax or mask,’ the "Hannity" host said. "Well, now the CDC is considering a revised new, new, new policy of vaccination and a mask. How many more mixed messages will the American people be given? One mask, two masks, no mask, some mass, mask indoors and mask outdoors and maybe mask in perpetuity and now it is never mind what we said before?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-fauci-new-mask-mandate
"Two months ago, it was Joe Biden who proudly declared a policy of ‘vax or mask,’ the "Hannity" host said. "Well, now the CDC is considering a revised new, new, new policy of vaccination and a mask. How many more mixed messages will the American people be given? One mask, two masks, no mask, some mass, mask indoors and mask outdoors and maybe mask in perpetuity and now it is never mind what we said before?
-
1
- Show all
- Status